Arches Platine & VDB - why hasn't anyone done this before?

Roses

A
Roses

  • 2
  • 0
  • 72
Rebel

A
Rebel

  • 4
  • 2
  • 92
Watch That First Step

A
Watch That First Step

  • 1
  • 0
  • 65
Barn Curves

A
Barn Curves

  • 2
  • 1
  • 59
Columbus Architectural Detail

A
Columbus Architectural Detail

  • 4
  • 2
  • 64

Forum statistics

Threads
197,488
Messages
2,759,844
Members
99,515
Latest member
falc
Recent bookmarks
1
Joined
Sep 15, 2005
Messages
515
Location
Salt Lake Ci
Format
Multi Format
Hehe.

I am preparing to make some 7x17 prints tonight with some Arches Platine I've had stashed away for some time now. Thought I'd make some quck 4x5 tests, and they're very very nice. I have tried a LOT of other papers, but the Platine is the best so far.

What I want to know is why hasn't anyone ever mentioned how GOOD it is?

Is it your 'dirty little secret'? Does one have to 'climb the mountain' before finding out about it? It blows away anything I've used before, so I'm starting to wonder why I even bothered starting with anything else.

In any case, it's all tongue-in-cheek, but I wanted to shout it from the rooftops now that I've actually used some of mine.

Watch out...here come the 7x17's. :D
 

Shinnya

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
583
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
Hi,

I think Platine is rather standard paper people use for Pt/Pd printing and other iron-based processes such as Kallitype and Vandyke. If you look the archive, one gets an impression that almost anyone who prints Pt/Pd uses this paper. The other option is COT320.

The only thing is the cost. There are more economical papers which print nicely too. I would certainly suggest Platine to someone who is rather new to these processes. It simply works great.

Happy printing,
tsuyoshi
 

gbock

Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2004
Messages
88
Location
Davis, CA
Format
Multi Format
Michael,

Platine is my standard paper for platinum/palladium. As Tsuyoshi pointed out, it's not the cheapest paper, but it's very, very nice. Some people have reported problems with black spots, but I've never had a problem. Knock on wood.

Gerhard
 

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
Michael Slade said:
Hehe.

I am preparing to make some 7x17 prints tonight with some Arches Platine I've had stashed away for some time now. Thought I'd make some quck 4x5 tests, and they're very very nice. I have tried a LOT of other papers, but the Platine is the best so far.

What I want to know is why hasn't anyone ever mentioned how GOOD it is?

Is it your 'dirty little secret'? Does one have to 'climb the mountain' before finding out about it? It blows away anything I've used before, so I'm starting to wonder why I even bothered starting with anything else.

In any case, it's all tongue-in-cheek, but I wanted to shout it from the rooftops now that I've actually used some of mine.

Watch out...here come the 7x17's. :D

FYI,

It's been done, that is Platine used for other processes. Trying making some cyanotypes with it. Luckily I've never gotten a bad batch of Platine as some have reported. I've never tried gum or gum overs with it but it is a good paper for many processes.

For alt. processes usually the first consideration is paper. Often there are good papers for a process that cost less than Platine, so more expensive doesn't always mean better. I personally prefer Platine over Cot320 as it is a little smoother to my eye and I think a little less expensive, though I keep both in stock.

Also having a variety of papers that you are familiar with provides some versatility with how a process will look and perform. After a while you will have your favorites.

Don Bryant
 

photomc

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Messages
3,575
Location
Texas
Format
Multi Format
sssssshhh!! Michael...don't tell everything you know. Platine, COT320, Platinotype (aka Cranes Cover Stock), all nice papers...Have also found that I like Rising Stonehenge (a lot) for VDB. As the others have mentioned, it comes down to using a "good" paper...a lesson I learned from Jorge and Mateo early on, since my first venture into alt process was Ziatypes on Cranes Kid Finish...nice paper, but just a bit thin and not good for a novice to start on.

There does seem to be some difference between Arches Platine and COT320, but not sure I could tell you what they are. Have fun....and try to keep the our secrets...
 
OP
OP
Kimberly Anderson
Joined
Sep 15, 2005
Messages
515
Location
Salt Lake Ci
Format
Multi Format
What side are you guys printing on? I've printed all of my tests on the 'rough' side, i.e. the side that if you read the watermark, it reads backwards.

The 'smooth' side, the side you can read the watermark normally, looks like it has the fine screen imprint on it.

Traditionally I have not printed on the screen side, but on the other side.

Thoughts?

I'll delete this thread just as soon as I milk you guys dry. :wink:

BTW, these 7x17's are part of THIS PROJECT.
 

Jeremy

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
2,761
Location
Denton, TX
Format
Multi Format
Michael, I also print on the "rough" side of Arches Platine, so you're not alone :smile:
 

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
Michael Slade said:
What side are you guys printing on? I've printed all of my tests on the 'rough' side, i.e. the side that if you read the watermark, it reads backwards.

The 'smooth' side, the side you can read the watermark normally, looks like it has the fine screen imprint on it.

Traditionally I have not printed on the screen side, but on the other side.

Thoughts?

I'll delete this thread just as soon as I milk you guys dry. :wink:

BTW, these 7x17's are part of THIS PROJECT.

The "right" reading side for the water mark is the "good side". Try printing on that side if you want a smoother surface after the print dries.

Not all papers have water marks, which means you need to look at the paper grain to determine the good side. For example Cranes Cover natural white 90 has a good side but isn't immediately obvious. Inspect the paper with a loupe and mark the paper with a small check mark or 'x' in two corners diagonal to each other with a soft lead pencil (never use and ink pen to mark the paper or make notes with). Then wet the paper throughly and let it dry. You should be able to determine the smooth side easily after it dries. You can then check to see which side you marked and determine if you picked the good side correctly.

When I cut parent sized sheets into smaller pieces I always mark the "felt" side as I've described above. That way when you are ready to work with the paper you don't have to worry about determining the good or smooth side of the paper.

Mucking around with paper can be a time consuming chore but you will save time in the long run. I store all of my cut paper in clear bags of one kind or another with labels on the bags indicating what kind the paper is, what batch it came from and where and when I bought it. I also note if a paper has been pre-shrunk or had an acid pre-treatment or if it has had an additional gelatin sizing. These are then all stored safely in flat file cabinets.

As I said all of this paper organization takes work but it pays off in the end.

Don Bryant
 
OP
OP
Kimberly Anderson
Joined
Sep 15, 2005
Messages
515
Location
Salt Lake Ci
Format
Multi Format
Made two prints...one is slightly light, the other is slightly dark. We'll see how I feel about them in the morning.

Interesting thing though, I noticed some bronzing on the print that I force dried the original coating, and hardly any at all on the print that I let air dry after coating.

Hmmm....
 

roy

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
1,324
Location
West Sussex
Format
Medium Format
Michael Slade said:
BTW, these 7x17's are part of THIS PROJECT

But the images you show are not all VDB's are they ?
 

photomc

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Messages
3,575
Location
Texas
Format
Multi Format
Good tips here Don....some new, some that just need to be reminded of.

Thanks,
 

Shinnya

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
583
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
Wow,

That sounds very ambitious...

After I got into pt/pd and gum over, I realized that I need more time before I can take up on Carbon printing. I will give myself a year or two to these processes.

Happy printing,
Tsuyoshi


Michael Slade said:
They'll be printed all VDB, Carbon, Pt/Pl or Polymergravure when the project is ready to be hung.
 

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
Michael Slade said:
Roy,

No, not yet. They'll be printed all VDB, Carbon, Pt/Pl or Polymergravure when the project is ready to be hung.

You may change your mind once you get to carbon and polymergravure. :smile:

Don Bryant
 
OP
OP
Kimberly Anderson
Joined
Sep 15, 2005
Messages
515
Location
Salt Lake Ci
Format
Multi Format
I've done many carbons in the past. They are my favorite of all printing processes. But, you are right, I might change my mind! :wink:
 
OP
OP
Kimberly Anderson
Joined
Sep 15, 2005
Messages
515
Location
Salt Lake Ci
Format
Multi Format
Printing today on the 'smooth' side of the Platine. First print out and it looks very nice. Perhaps slightly more resolution on the smooth side rather than the textured.

Also noticed less bronzing. Two reasons for this maybe. Today I'm using 3.5 ml of solution, yesterday was 4 ml. Today I'm allowing them to air dry w/no heat...yesterday's were force dried. Single coating on both yesterday and today.

I think I'll play with double coating tomorrow...
 

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
Michael Slade said:
Printing today on the 'smooth' side of the Platine. First print out and it looks very nice. Perhaps slightly more resolution on the smooth side rather than the textured.

Also noticed less bronzing. Two reasons for this maybe. Today I'm using 3.5 ml of solution, yesterday was 4 ml. Today I'm allowing them to air dry w/no heat...yesterday's were force dried. Single coating on both yesterday and today.

I think I'll play with double coating tomorrow...

Double coat always with VDB. Let the first coat dry before applying the second. I'm not sure of your negative size but for 7x17 3,5 ml sounds okay. Too much solution and over exposure can cause bronzing. Are you printing a step wedge too?

Don Bryant
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom