Arad - Romania

Near my home (2)

D
Near my home (2)

  • 1
  • 3
  • 33
Not Texas

H
Not Texas

  • 3
  • 0
  • 38
Floating

D
Floating

  • 3
  • 0
  • 18

Forum statistics

Threads
198,524
Messages
2,776,610
Members
99,638
Latest member
Jux9pr
Recent bookmarks
0

perkeleellinen

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
2,904
Location
Warwickshire
Format
35mm
It's 40C (104F) in Arad at the moment, hope it's a bit cooler when we go in early September. We're travelling by train (London, Paris, Munich, Budapest, Arad) and taking only two backpacks. I'm almost convinced that I'll just take a small P&S and a few rolls of film. I've been before and didn't think it was that nice of a place to photograph, sure, it has some nice civic buildings but I don't want to photograph them.

This is really just to ask, has anyone else been to Arad? Did you find it photogenic? Should I consider a 'better' camera that will take up space and weigh more?

Thanks,
Steve.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
Photogenic is in the eye of the beholder - perhaps the thing to do is not photograph the buildings or scenery at all, but instead concentrate on the people. Then taking a "better" camera would make more sense. Besides, you'll have a lot of places before Arad that are highly "photogenic" to burn some film in, so why build the journey around the destination?
 

railwayman3

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
2,816
Format
35mm
And, if weight is a consideration, and your P&S is of good enough technical quality to give results which you are happy with, why bother to take a whole lot of "better" gear.

It's sometimes refreshing to work within the constraints of a small, simple. camera with a standard lens, particularly if time is limited and photography is not the main purpose of a holiday. The photographer and his/her "artistic eye" are much more important to a successful picture than a whole lot of heavy gear.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,695
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
A simpler camera is a good idea.

But if you choose one that relies on batteries, I would suggest one that takes AA batteries.
 
OP
OP

perkeleellinen

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
2,904
Location
Warwickshire
Format
35mm
My P&S is a Nikon Lite Touch. My other option would be either a FM2 or a Fuji 645.

Our train journey, the bit I'm really looking forward to, has stop overs in those cities for only a few hours. We won't have time to explore. I remember Erich Hartmann used an XA for his 'Train Journey Through France' - travelling light and being inconspicuous.

This is really a family trip - we're taking our two year old to see his Romanian family for the first time - there will be lots of chatting & eating and group photos, maybe some nice candid shots. I thought the Nikon Lite Touch with the 28mm lens would be good for that and also the cramped interior of a train.
 

P C Headland

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
822
Location
New Zealand
Format
Multi Format
Given the options you've listed, my first choice would be the big point and shoot - the Fuji. Not too big, but great quality when you want it.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom