Apparent Confusion about Artistic Expression

Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 0
  • 0
  • 9
Summer Lady

A
Summer Lady

  • 0
  • 0
  • 9
DINO Acting Up !

A
DINO Acting Up !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 8
What Have They Seen?

A
What Have They Seen?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 13
Lady With Attitude !

A
Lady With Attitude !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 13

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,755
Messages
2,780,468
Members
99,698
Latest member
Fedia
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,230
Format
Large Format
Ray Heath said:
hang on Donald
it may be you who doesn't want to discuss these issues

as i wrote above, your images do not mean the same to me as they do to you, that is not a failing in me or in you, it is because of our differences in culture/experience/history/background/beliefs/values and a 'failing' in any art

don't tell me, and others, i don't understand sybolism, you don't know me, nor do you know what i respond to

as an aside, i was previously interested in why a talented photographer would not show his final/best work, what is the sybolism in that? you wouldn't discuss that issue either

Well Ray,

Considering what you have said in this last statement, let me extend to you the courtesy of beginning this discussion. You may begin at any place that you choose. If you would be so kind, please begin with a discussion of your experience of how creativity enters into your photography. What your photography is conveying to you, and what you hope to find out through your personal photography. Please share with us the things, forms, shapes, patterns and textures that intrigue you. What understanding you have come to in your preferences and how they apply to you. Please share with us how you use various means to arrive at compositions that speak to you and what those means are for you.

You should feel favored to begin this discussion and I am sure that others will chime in with their questions for you and by sharing their own experiences and thoughts on the matter. I assure you that I will enter the discussion...but I don't want to be interperted as being holier then thou by preaching to the choir.

Whenever you are ready, you may begin...and thank you for sharing with us.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
2,360
Location
East Kent, U
Format
Medium Format
Andy K said:
For those of us who have never had any kind of schooling in art, and are simply enjoying making photographs that please us to look at, perhaps someone could post the rules as to what is artistic impression.

<edit> I'm not being sarcastic, I genuinely want to know.
Andy, we have been here before, and on occasion we have not seen eye to eye, and if there's one rule in art today, it's the rule that says there are no rules, BUT ...

... if you want to hear my personal definition of artistic expression, formulated for my own benefit, it is this:

Art for me has the quality of exploration, of wanting to experience things in a new way, of asking questions, of not necessarily providing answers, of engaging the viewer in a dialog and encouraging/stimulating interpretation and active participation in the artistic experience by the viewer.

On the other hand, there is another approach, where the main interest is in process, in the mechanism of making objects and the technicalities of this, and in a desire above all to achieve high skill levels in these areas. Followers of this approach may say that they do "what they like," but this is likely to be close iterations of what they and others have done before. I have no right and no desire to criticize these people in any way, but I do believe that what they practise is craft - and not art.

Regards,

David
 

John McCallum

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
2,407
Location
New Zealand
Format
Multi Format
Donald Miller said:
(snip) If you fail to grasp it then you fail to grasp it. Others do grasp it and that is as it should be.
Donald, I think there are quite a few who "fail to grasp it". Can you enlighten us with real examples from your portfolio, with sufficient explanation but you know, dumbed down a bit. Thanks.

David makes a good point regarding craft vs art. Picking up on that point, there has been an analogy drawn in performance music.

When a musician is practicing scales they are a craftsperson. When they perform in concert they are an artist.


I like this analogy. It allows exploration of whatever technique the photographer desires to achieve their personal expression in their images. Of course there are some who have Van Gogh's ear for music, no matter how hard they practice :smile:.

mhv said:
...There's been too much Stieglitz and not enough Picasso in photography, if you want my opinion.
Nice statement.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tony Egan

Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Messages
1,295
Location
Sydney, Australia
Format
Multi Format
Good technique liberates creativity. I don't think anyone would disagree with this? The problem is the liberation part. It's scary. How many of us really take risks with our lives not to mention our photography? At my most self-critical moments I look at my photos and say, "yeah, that's the kind of photo a f@#%ing accountant would take!!". Let's face it, I am unlikey to ever be a renowned artist but I love and am drawn to this medium as part of my search for truth and beauty in the world. Yet I play it too safe. I am unliberated. This will inevitably come through in my photos. I don't think you can learn or describe creativity. You ARE creative by virtue of the way you live and conduct yourself. i.e... if I could explain in words what I felt I wouldn't have taken the photo...
I recently read a Cartier-Bresson biography and was interested to find out about his great family wealth and his apparent disdain for it. And also about his year after leaving school in Africa wandering through the jungle at night shooting things (with a gun) and almost dying from a tropical disease. And his time in a concentration camp, escapes and work for the reisistance. These unconventional "liberating" experiences undoubtedly drove the creative process in his photography.
Maybe we should drag out Barthes' Camera Lucida and delve into the "studium" and "punctum"? Reading this thread I sense people can see the studium in Donald's work but there is no punctum for them. That's OK, after all it is about the individual's response to the image. The pointy bit can be different for different people in any single image based on their education, culture and experiences. But, I've always found French philosophy a bit dense. I prefer something attributed to Max Dupain, a famous Australian photographer: "I think we should be more concerned with depth of feeling than depth of field".
 
OP
OP

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,230
Format
Large Format
O.K. it seems that Ray would prefer to attack rather then share his thoughts and experiences and the Bill and several others prefer the same. Regardless I do think that this is a vitally important subject for those who aspire to create and it is a vitally important subject for those of us who desire to gain a better understanding of ourselves and our place in life. So let me begin, if I may...

I will begin at what was for me the beginning.

Like many photographers, I think, I was impressed with the photography of Ansel Adams, Howard Bond, and others. I sought to emulate them and so I attended workshops and I made photographs much the same as those they made.

If you look at my website at the Landscape and Nature images, you will observe that many of those images are indicative of that genre. Lincoln Falls, Crystal River Morning Rain were both made in the late 1980s. These are pretty images. What I would consider today to be "calender art".

At about that same time, I was involved in beginning stages of recovery from alcoholism and beginning to incorporate a relationship to a higher power, or God if you will, into my daily life and my life considerations. That process had began in 1984 and continues today.

Also in the late 1980's because of that process, I began to make images that are to me, today, more meaningful because they were not seeking to emulate the pure landscape style of Adams, Burnbaum, or Bond. This is the time period that those images in my Transitions portfolio were made. I began to photograph totally different subject matter along with the landscape images. The Doorways and Doorway and Curtain image are both from that same period and of the different type. Doorways, Windows, Bridges, Paths, Light, are all things that can be defined as having dual meaning...They can be literal and they can be symbolic. They can be both or either depending on the individual.

The images in my Transition portfolio are photographs that speak to me symbollicaly and this is because of what was going on in my life at the time. This is the beginning of my belief that the camera does indeed point both ways, as Gordon described so very effectively in his response.

I believe that it is the nature of man to seek to define himself throughout his/her lifetime. It is in the act of photographing that we are afforded one means by which we accomplish this ongoing process. But how does this work?

Well returning to the "Granite Pool -Reflections" image in "Transitions" c.1989 What I saw much later is that the image conveyed a deeper understanding then what I recognized at the time of the exposure. The image today speaks to me symbolically in this way...The pool is symbolic of "mind". In examining the image, we can observe that there are stones below the surface of the water and a reflecton of a tree on the surface of the water. These two come very near but not completely touching each other. The reflection of the tree, being on the surface, represents conscious mind and the stones beneath the surface of the water represent the unconscious mind. The tension point created by there extreme proximity to each other is indicative of the tension within us at the juncture of conscious and unconscious mind. Examining the image still further, the lower right hand portion of the stone enclosure the shape is quite similar to a human leg and thigh. So the location of the pool could be observed and attributed as the place of birth because of the similarity of the female human form. Thus this image translates symbolically to "Mind is the place of birth"...which quite literally it is. Without human thought or creative motivation nothing of consequence occurs.

Other of my images carry symbolic meanins for me as well. They quite honestly may not carry the same meaning to someone else...but then again they may. Nor have all of my images been symbolic in meaning...or did I immediately cease making photographs of rocks, streams, or "known objects" because my understanding of how photographs reveal the photographer to himself/herself was incremental in development.

I think it is the nature of man to seek to make order from chaos. That is part of the creative process and it is the impetus behind some of our photographic efforts.

I have much more to discuss about this. I hope that others will now join this discussion without negativity, rancor, and personal attack. I think that we all have something to gain from exploring this. Thank you for allowing me to expound.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
2,360
Location
East Kent, U
Format
Medium Format
Art or craft? Since you ask, I'd have to say craft - a quite startling level of craft skill in a highly impractical medium - how on earth you make a sand painting permanent, I can't begin to imagine! The level of artistic expression for me - and I can only speak for myself - is at greetings card level, but the woman is obviously talented and I would like to have an opportunity to see more of her work in other media (if she has any) which has perhaps been produced in a slower and more considered way.
 
OP
OP

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,230
Format
Large Format
gr82bart said:
Oh you guys are too cynical! :wink:

Art.

Yes, it seems that when some don't understand or have anything positive to contribute that it is their nature to express negativity through personal attacks. Unfortunately these people do not understand that this speaks more of them then it does of me.
 

Ed Sukach

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
4,517
Location
Ipswich, Mas
Format
Medium Format
Sparky said:
I'm disappointed to see the way many people here are reacting to Donald's challenge...
...I fully agree with Donald I think - maybe there's a website/forum where those of us who DO want to talk about such things can go...? I dunno. If anyone has any ideas...
THIS should be the website where we CAN, and DO talk about those ideas!!
 

Ed Sukach

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
4,517
Location
Ipswich, Mas
Format
Medium Format
Donald Miller said:
Yes, it seems that when some don't understand or have anything positive to contribute that it is their nature to express negativity through personal attacks. Unfortunately these people do not understand that this speaks more of them then it does of me.
I agree! Damned straight!
 

gr82bart

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
5,591
Location
Los Angeles and Toronto
Format
Multi Format
David H. Bebbington said:
Art or craft? Since you ask, I'd have to say craft - a quite startling level of craft skill in a highly impractical medium - how on earth you make a sand painting permanent, I can't begin to imagine! The level of artistic expression for me - and I can only speak for myself - is at greetings card level, but the woman is obviously talented and I would like to have an opportunity to see more of her work in other media (if she has any) which has perhaps been produced in a slower and more considered way.
It's a craft if she does it, but if Tibetan monks do it as Mandala Sand Paintings, does it now become art?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/buddhism/features/mandala/

I too am curious as to when 'it' becomes 'art'. I'd like to know where the line in the sand is (pun intended but not to be sarcastic).

I'm a simple guy. I like what I like - art, craft, or hobby. Which really leads to the heart of the matter - is art about expression or is art about interpretation or both?

Regards, Art.
BTW I have several greeting cards with everything from Dali to Warhol to Adams on them! Eeek...
 

Ed Sukach

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
4,517
Location
Ipswich, Mas
Format
Medium Format
Donald Miller said:
Bill,
... Or do you jump to conclusions so rapidly in each and every matter in your life? Do you have the ability or the knowledge to intelligently discuss this matter apart from trying to subtley diminish it? Do you have knowledge of symbolic meaning? If so I welcome your presence...I welcome all positive input.
I can't see ANY indication of a "conclusion jump" here. His input - and I take it as positive, is: "Don't `overthink' anything when you photograph". Agree or not, it IS a valid choice for some.

We seem to revert back to freedom. If I accept freedom of artistic expression for myself, I also MUST accept the fact that everyone else has the same freedom.
 

Ray Heath

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
1,204
Location
Eastern, Aus
Format
Multi Format
HANG ON DONALD
I have shared my thoughts

YOU ARE NOT LISTENING to anything but your own drivel

i don't have to explain my reasons or feelings or any that other crap about my work

my work stands, or falls, as presented

don't patronise or belittle me, and don't dismiss this as another attack or an example of being defensive
 

Ray Heath

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
1,204
Location
Eastern, Aus
Format
Multi Format
yeh right Donald, that's a mature and thoughtful way to conduct a debate

i'm not aggressive, your just a little pissant with too much time on your hands

you don't want a discussion you want a soap box
 

Ed Sukach

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
4,517
Location
Ipswich, Mas
Format
Medium Format
Ray Heath said:
g'day Donald
i've also looked at your "Transitions" portfolio
great images, well presented

but as for deeper and symbolic meanings that are important to you, i don't get them, you haven't expressed them in a way i can comprehend

so if these symbolic meanings are the important thing, for you, then i must conclude that these images are failures
Why MUST you conclude that they are "failures"? Is there some written commandment that states, "All thine images must meet my requirements for 'symbolic connection" (n.b., "my") or they fail."

I propose that NO photograph -- or any other work of art - has EVER "reached" EVERYONE... universally, with the same effect ... or will they - ever.

Come to think of it ... why MUST you do anything?
 

Ray Heath

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
1,204
Location
Eastern, Aus
Format
Multi Format
so Donny
how does this ignore thing work?

can i still post here? but you don't see it?

or am i locked out?

you're the final authority on everything, so please explain
 

DBP

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2006
Messages
1,905
Location
Alexandria,
Format
Multi Format
Ed Sukach said:
I propose that NO photograph -- or any other work of art - has EVER "reached" EVERYONE... universally, with the same effect ... or will they - ever.

Heartily concur. For example (and I can see the upset responses coming already), the work of Ansel Adams does nothing for me emotionally, though I admire the technique.
 

Ray Heath

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
1,204
Location
Eastern, Aus
Format
Multi Format
Ed,

i agree entirely

but consider this - if Donald's symbolic message is so very important to him, but i don't get it, then at the level he intends, they are failures

by his reckoning, not mine

i didn't say they must meet my requirements, but it seems, in my case, they didn't meet his
 

bill schwab

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
3,751
Location
Meeshagin
Format
Multi Format
Ray Heath said:
...you don't want a discussion you want a soap box
I have to agree with this statement as well Donald. It seems that those that agree with your comments are welcome to "discuss". Those with a dissenting view or that think you are the one spreading BS are considered pariahs, malcontents and viewed as attackers. It should occur to you that there are those that may come to the conclusion that it is you who are the sensitive and defensive one.

Bill
 

Ed Sukach

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
4,517
Location
Ipswich, Mas
Format
Medium Format
Tony Egan said:
Good technique liberates creativity. I don't think anyone would disagree with this?
This was going to produce a knee-jerk reaction of, "Me! I disagree!", but on further thought ... I haven't been able to pin down with any sort of certainty what is meant by "creativity". I also realize that I really do not know what is meant by "good technique", either.

With all that... I really think the time line in, "Good technique liberates creativity", is reversed. With me, the "flash", the inspiration, comes first, then the necessity of "the technique". Example: I realize what - I want to make an image of an apple. With that, I must now decide HOW, a.k.a., "select the technique", or acquire the technique, as is appropriate.

A wonderful artist, Helen Van Wyk, once said it: The DOING is really not hard. We can all learn that. The What-to-do is the hard part.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom