• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Anyone using a Monopod?

Tompkins Square Park

A
Tompkins Square Park

  • 2
  • 0
  • 35
Siesta Time

A
Siesta Time

  • 1
  • 0
  • 30

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,858
Messages
2,846,658
Members
101,572
Latest member
apltd
Recent bookmarks
0

hoffy

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
3,073
Location
Adelaide, Au
Format
Multi Format
OK, so the S2A that I am using is like a twin barrel shot gun when it goes off. There is plenty of recoil in the mechanism that there has to be a bit of camera shake.

BUT, when going to public events, using a tripod is pretty much out of the question. People get annoyed when you try and set up (& rightly so) and its a PITA to carry around. So, I have been thinking of a nice monopod instead. While its not enough to do long exposures, I figure that it should be enough to deal with camera shake @ 1/60th (or even 1/30th) and over.

Anyone here regularly use a monopod when out and about with their Medium format gear? Do you think it helps? Or do you think that there is not much difference?

Cheers
 
Rarely, but my hiking stick is also a mono pod and I have put the Rolleiflex on it a couple of times...and jamming it into the ground, between rocks or into the snow I have been able to do longer exposures. Tricky, though. But in general, it has been helpful, but it is hard to beat a tripod when you need one.
 
I use one with both my Mamiya C330 and my Mamiya RB67. In both cases, with a waist level finder. It definitely helps, but I cannot say that I have evaluated exactly what exposure speed options it permits.

If possible, you will want one with an adjustable head, so as to permit using it and your two legs together as a "tripod".
 
Almost always when not using tripod. For both TLR and MF SLR.
 
I don't use a head when shooting square format. No value. But always a quick release.
 
I'm never sure how much better monopod allows slow shutter speed but there is always advantage against jitter.
 
OK, thanks. I can get my hands on a Manfrotto 3 section with a basic tilt head on it. I am going to go out this arvo to a Rod show, so I will see if I can use it today.

When I was shooting 35mm exclusively I used this monopod. I would put a foot on one side and my knee on the other side of the pod and it would beome very stable with a little leverage. Kinda like some kind of a three point stance.
 
When I was shooting 35mm exclusively I used this monopod. I would put a foot on one side and my knee on the other side of the pod and it would beome very stable with a little leverage. Kinda like some kind of a three point stance.

Good technique Bruce. Sounds quite stable.
 
OK, so the S2A that I am using is like a twin barrel shot gun when it goes off. There is plenty of recoil in the mechanism that there has to be a bit of camera shake.

BUT, when going to public events, using a tripod is pretty much out of the question. People get annoyed when you try and set up (& rightly so) and its a PITA to carry around. So, I have been thinking of a nice monopod instead. While its not enough to do long exposures, I figure that it should be enough to deal with camera shake @ 1/60th (or even 1/30th) and over.

Anyone here regularly use a monopod when out and about with their Medium format gear? Do you think it helps? Or do you think that there is not much difference?

Cheers

I use a monopod all the time;it's easy to carry and makes a world of difference.I have often been told that I cannot use a tripod in some places but nobody has ever complained about my monopod.:smile:
 
I'm never sure how much better monopod allows slow shutter speed but there is always advantage against jitter.

Like Vaughan my hiking stick is also a monopod. I've noticed a real improvement in sharpness when using it, often it's impossible to use speeds faster than 1/60 or so in dense woods. Better support always equals improved sharpness.
 
I use a Manfrotto monopod and Monfrotto trigger type ball head, the latter being defective from the start.

I added the tripod foot too. That all is heavy, but gives countless ways to use the combo.
 
Monopods do two things. They support the weight of the camera which can be a good thing with larger kit over a long day, and they reduce the range of motion when holding the camera. How much exposure extension you can get from reducing camera shake from three axes to just two axes is going to vary from individual to individual. Maybe a stop, possibly two.

As I look at it, any support is better than none, and the monopod portability makes it much less of a trial to carry and use. I have to use a tripod with the 5x4 and pinhole cameras. For the rest the monopod gets a lot of use.
 
I used to use one very often with my Mamiya 645 when I was using that a lot on all day adventures. I loved it at the time and somehow forgot about it as time has gone on. I'll have to pull is back out!
 
I don't use one too often however, whenever there is less chance of being able to brace the camera against something, like a tree, fence, car, it becomes more valuable. I have a couple of them ranging from light to heavy duty, and consider them a tool worth keeping. However, while not as portable, I do have a well built ultra lite tripod that would be, in some cases, the tool of choice.
 
My wife cannot hold a camera really steady these days. Even modern image stabilization is not a cure. I managed to persuade her to try using a monopod, and she was really pleased by the improvement. Any support is better than none. At least most film cameras are designed to be held against part of the body or stressed on a strap, and not held at arms' length as a matter or course.

Where you compromise between portability and stability is up to you.
 
Besides being usefull for steadying your camera they make great weapons, three teenage punks tried to mug me and steal my cameras in broad daylight in the city centre four years ago, I put two of them in hospital and the third one beat a hasty retreat.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I use an old Linhof monopod (5 sections, 286g) with Triopo ball head for my FUJI GA645 and GA645Wi.
It's small, handy and fits my Domke F-6 bag.


For my Bronica ETRSi I prefer a Linhof tripod.
 
I saw a pro video photographer yesterday, using a ponomod with a 3-legged stand at the foot.
 
I saw a pro video photographer yesterday, using a ponomod with a 3-legged stand at the foot.

A tripod for the monopod.
 
OK, so the S2A that I am using is like a twin barrel shot gun when it goes off. There is plenty of recoil in the mechanism that there has to be a bit of camera shake.

BUT, when going to public events, using a tripod is pretty much out of the question. People get annoyed when you try and set up (& rightly so) and its a PITA to carry around. So, I have been thinking of a nice monopod instead. While its not enough to do long exposures, I figure that it should be enough to deal with camera shake @ 1/60th (or even 1/30th) and over.

Anyone here regularly use a monopod when out and about with their Medium format gear? Do you think it helps? Or do you think that there is not much difference?

Cheers
I use a manfrotto monopod with my Hasselblad all the time and it makes a huge difference;not as good as a tripod but much better then leaning against a post or tree;1/30s any time of the day;even 1/8 is worth a try
 
I use a monopod with my RB67 all the time (unless I know I'm looking for long-exposures). I mainly use it to support the weight while I'm composing. It's not a tripod, but it's a real life-saver when I'm already walking a lot.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom