Anyone Try Eco-Pro chemicals?

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,963
Location
UK
Format
35mm
What stuf. There does not appear to be anything shown
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,954
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
I use the citric acid stop, and the Neutral fix. Love them both especially the fixer.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,474
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
It's interesting that the description says that "Xtol is an exceptional film developer originally formulated by Kodak to meet the highest environmental and photographic standards. Full film speed, a long tonal range and exceptionally fine grain make this the best ascorbic acid film developer ever created." It seems as though they might find it difficult to improve on that.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,760
Format
35mm
KidA said:
As in the difference between powder and liquid concentrates?
Click to expand...

As in, Kodak has liquid without water in it. The LegacyPro has liquid but it contains water. I've heard this gives it a shorter shelf life.
 

Neal

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
2,020
Location
Chicago, West Suburbs
Format
Multi Format
Dear KidA,

I have used the paper developer and fixer. Both appear to work without issue. This is probably just seeing what I want to see but higher concentrations of the paper developer appear to look a bit colder.

Good luck,

Neal Wydra
 

bsdunek

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
1,611
Location
Michigan
Format
Multi Format
The first time I tried LegecyPro paper developer, it turned brown and wouldn't work. I contacted Freestyle and they had it replaced quickly. The replacement worked fine. I haven't bought any more LegecyPro developers - a little gun shy I guess. I am using their stop and it if fine.
Interestingly, LegecyPro chemicals are made, or at least come from, very near me in Dexter, Michigan. It's the old Unicolor facility that made photo supplies in the 70's and 80's.
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,675
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
I have used the developer that is supposed to be similar to Xtol. I found that my Xtol times were the same as the Legacy pro development times, however it seemed to me that the Legacy pro stock solution died more quickly.
 
OP
OP

KidA

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
217
Format
Multi Format
dpurdy said:
I have used the developer that is supposed to be similar to Xtol. I found that my Xtol times were the same as the Legacy pro development times, however it seemed to me that the Legacy pro stock solution died more quickly.
Click to expand...
How much sooner we talking? Also, how were results compared to Xtol?
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,675
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
KidA said:
How much sooner we talking? Also, how were results compared to Xtol?
Click to expand...
It would be really difficult to see any difference between the two. Mixed fresh I use it (I still have a couple of bags) exactly as I do Xtol. I don't dump the developer when I am done, I either replenish with fresh solution as I go or I use the extended time system. My experience with Xtol in a 5 liter tank with a tight fitting floating lid is that it lasts some months, definitely to the end of the limit of extended time. When I tried that with Legacy Pro and went a month without using it, I found it had turned yellowish and it underdeveloped some sheet film so I dumped it.
Sorry my observations aren't very scientific.
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,430
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
I have used the L110 (HC110 replacement) film developer and found the results exactly the same as HC110. However, shelf life isn't nearly as long as HC110.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Alan9940 said:
I have used the L110 (HC110 replacement) film developer and found the results exactly the same as HC110. However, shelf life isn't nearly as long as HC110.
Click to expand...

It's because of the water in the Legacy product. Water is necessary for oxidation; no water no oxidation. Hence the proverbial long life of HC-110.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Alan9940 said:
I have used the L110 (HC110 replacement) film developer and found the results exactly the same as HC110. However, shelf life isn't nearly as long as HC110.
Click to expand...

If you compare the MSDS for the two developers you will see that their formulas are very different.
Cholentpot said:
Thanks for straightening that out for me.
Click to expand...

There is some useful information tucked away in MSDS forms. Although sometimes a bit of digging is required. All in all a valuable resource for any APUGer.
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,430
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
Gerald C Koch said:
If you compare the MSDS for the two developers you will see that their formulas are very different.
Click to expand...

Yes, I know they are very different. I meant only that, for me, development time was the same (for Tri-X which is my main film with this developer) and results were the same.
 
OP
OP

KidA

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
217
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for all the responses everyone.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,252
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The products appear to work well for people, and they seem to serve as reasonable substitutes for many of the products they emulate. They do not, however, give exactly the same results.

I've been told that the educational markets like them because of low toxicity, including no metol. I've also been told that the paper developers don't give the same deep blacks as some of the metol laden alternatives. As you may have noted, observations like that have a subjective component to them.

If they are being made in North America, that ads an option that is a plus for me, because sourcing almost all chemicals from Germany (Kodak and Ilford) leaves one vulnerable to a whole bunch of factors entirely outside my control.

One minor complaint though - what is it with the thread title?

I use thread titles to help me decide on my APUG reading choices. It really helps if the titles give me a hint about the subject of the thread - something like "Anyone Try LegacyPro EcoPro Chemicals?"

I'll ask the moderators to update the title.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Thanks, Matt. Title updated.

Please use a descriptive title folks!
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,273
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Only from memory but I think they are made by the same people that made Unicolor chemistry and they are ex Eastman Kodak possibly photo-chemists which is why they know what they are doing.

I rember PE (Ron Mowray) commenting about some chemistry from a UK company stating they couldn't be using the right chemicals in a colour developer, but they were as 2 directors involved in making the chemistry were ex Kodak (Harrow) employees.

Ian
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…