Anyone tried JandC Classic Ortho in 35mm?

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
I'd like to try an ortho film eventually, but I can't invest in 100ft roll of JandC ortho, and don't have easy access to a 4x5. Has anyone ever used it?

I've tried Efke R25/50, which is so far the closest I've been to ortho films. If someone has it in 35mm cartridge, I'd be willing to pay film+shipping on a few ones.
 

Jeremy

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
2,761
Location
Denton, TX
Format
Multi Format
Try giving John at J&C a call. He might be willing to spool up a couple of rolls for you.
 

jandc

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2004
Messages
601

The rolls are not 100 feet long. They are 10 meters (6 rolls worth) or just shy of 33 feet. We had them cut to this length for the very reason stated above. We assumed that most people are not going to use a 100 foot roll of ortho film in a reasonable time.

The film is identical to Maco Ort 25. For the cost of about 2 36 exp rolls of this film you get the equivalent of 6 rolls.
 
OP
OP

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format

Oops! My imperial/metric systems superpowers are indeed weak. Thing is, my bulk loader is already full with a fresh reel of Tri-X, but I'd be willing to pay a tad more to have it spooled on cheap cartridges.
 

titrisol

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
2,072
Location
UIO/ RDU / RTM/ POZ / GRU
Format
Multi Format
Ortho film is not sensitive to red, so using an anti-red filter on your camera should do the trick??
anti-red = cyan

 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,332
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
For that matter, since the film is red-blind, if you have a red darkroom safelight you can hand spool the film under safelight. No need to disturb the Tri-X resting in the bulk loader...
 
OP
OP

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Donald Qualls said:
For that matter, since the film is red-blind, if you have a red darkroom safelight you can hand spool the film under safelight. No need to disturb the Tri-X resting in the bulk loader...

Quite right, indeed. I don't have my own darkroom but I use one at a local arts center. I would just have to cut some 5' lengths of film and spool them by hand so I get an approximate 36exp. Thank you!
 

fschifano

Member
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
Be careful there. I'd venture a guess and say that the safelights in your public darkroom may not be red, but rather the equivalent of the Kodak "OC" safelights. These are safe for papers but may not be for ortho films. I occassionally use some Ilford Ortho Plus and the specs recommend a dark red safelight and against anything else. My safelights are set up with the Kodak 1A filters which are much brighter than the dark red and they will fog the Ilford Ortho Plus. Better test a small piece before you open the whole thing should you choose to use it. Anyway, it's not to hard to do this in the dark. If you can load a SS reel in the dark, you should have no problem reloading a 35mm cassette. A little practice with a scrap roll and a length reference is all you need to get the job done.
 

titrisol

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
2,072
Location
UIO/ RDU / RTM/ POZ / GRU
Format
Multi Format
If I was you I'd load 20 exposures/roll.
I've found it's easier to work and gives you a tad more flexibility due to smaller length.
 
OP
OP

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format

Their safelights are red, but maybe using my reliable closet would be even safer. I could just cut the roll in suitable length, then tape the end of a strip to a spool, put in the cassette, and then throw the cassette in my 35mm body to rewind the film into the cassette.
 
OP
OP

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Well, quite a few weeks later, I have got my hands on some extra bulk loaders, so my Tri-X is sleeping quietly in its nest, and I have a nice roll of ORT 25 sitting in another one, so I'm ready to try it out!

I'm not sure yet what kind of developer I could rely on for pictorial applications. I'm not intending to use to film for copy work (yet), so I'd use a rather normal contrast. Would paper developers (I have Agfa multicontrast) be a good choice? Or would good ol' Rodinal be enough?
 

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,413
Format
Multi Format
If my memory goes far enough back to high school, we used to dev this in the Kodak "A" and "B" devs. I'm not sure I'm right here and I'm not sure that Kodak even makes this stuff, but we used to get a pure black & white image out of the stuff.

Perhaps a recipe is given in the "Darkroom Cookbook: for a dev.
 

jandc

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2004
Messages
601


D-76 - 7 min
Rodinal 1:100 11-12 min
 
OP
OP

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
jandc said:
D-76 - 7 min
Rodinal 1:100 11-12 min

Thanks again JandC for an excellent product!

I posted an image in the technical gallery : (there was a url link here which no longer exists) for those interested. Dev'd in Rodinal.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…