Anyone recommend a good bag for Hasselblad (and Bronica)?

Katie · Nov 8, 2010

I think I have decided on the Domke F-2 in the waxwear finish with inserts.

It's cute - even for it's size.
It's rugged - like me (not).
It's in a great price range.
It's got great feedback so far.

Thanks so much for your input everyone!

AgentX · Nov 8, 2010

Wow, that's the first time I think a Domke has been called "cute..."

Sirius Glass · Nov 8, 2010

Katie said:
I think I have decided on the Domke F-2 in the waxwear finish with inserts.

It's cute - even for it's size.
It's rugged - like me (not).
It's in a great price range.
It's got great feedback so far.

Thanks so much for your input everyone!

Now that the OP has made a decision and acted on it, there will be a flood of postings with advice about what she should have gotten.

Its the APUG way.

germanotero · Nov 8, 2010

I have a rolleiflex sl66 gripped with several lenses (5) + lightmeter + filters bay VI + cookin p set. all in a Lowepro vertex 200, I know is not the best to walk arround in the city. and it's a system a bit heavy for a girl, but, what can I tell you, to me (I'm used to take landscape photo) is the best.. it has all weather cover, it can hold my Manfrotto, and everithing..
Also I used to have a crumpler 6 or 7 million dolar it was for my digital gear (canon with some lenses and flashes), and i found out that the messenger type of pack is not the best for heavy cameras. My back told me that once..
I recomends you to buy some medium-small backpack. Lowepro has very good solutions, and Crumpler too, but crumpler is expensive.

mooseontheloose · Nov 8, 2010

Katie said:
I think I have decided on the Domke F-2 in the waxwear finish with inserts.

It's cute - even for it's size.
It's rugged - like me (not).
It's in a great price range.
It's got great feedback so far.

Thanks so much for your input everyone!

Katie,

I'm a little late to the party but you might also consider jill-e bags -- very good quality, durable camera bags that are attractive and geared towards women. I have this bag (small size) which fits my Bronica SQ set up (body, three lenses, three backs, plus film) -- there are larger sizes if you want it to hold two systems. They also seem to be coming up with new designs and bags all the time.

The one downside is that they are a bit expensive (but shop around for prices).

David William White · Nov 8, 2010

Sirius Glass said:
Now that the OP has made a decision and acted on it, there will be a flood of postings with advice about what she should have gotten.

Glad makes some nice bags in different sizes. Waterproof & cheap.

benjiboy · Nov 9, 2010

A Domke f2 Rugged wear IMO is a very good choice Katie, because it's lightweight for it's size, it's "shooters bag" that's easy to access your gear even on the run, the finish of the bag will improve with age until it looks beat up and like it doesn't contain anything of value, and they seem to swallow up as much as you can put in them.

Katie · Nov 9, 2010

HAHA! Thanks guys. I checked out JillE, Billingham, Epiphanie, Kelly Moore, Crumpler, and the Etsy handmade one's. While STYLE was clearly on the top of the list for THESE, I found that the Domke had the look I like (ie: non lunch box or backpack, but more of a bag that doesn't look camera bag-ish) AND had the inserts that I wanted, as well as easy access to equipment. It also is waterproof and has a weathered "vintage" feel to it, which is also very "me". I want the bag to match the cameras. I would think a Hasselblad 500C would feel more at home in a weathered Domke than a shiny new leather JillE. (kinda like me, too).

Cute is surely subjective, right? I *DO* think they are very stylish!

olleorama · Nov 9, 2010

www.pompidoo.com If I weren't a guy, I'd buy it.

Mainecoonmaniac · Nov 9, 2010

So versitile

olleorama said:
www.pompidoo.com If I weren't a guy, I'd buy it.

So versatile that you could keep your chihuahua and your Leica. I'm sure if Paris Hilton was an analog photographer she'd get one to carry them both

olleorama · Nov 9, 2010

Mainecoonmaniac said:
So versatile that you could keep your chihuahua and your Leica. I'm sure if Paris Hilton was an analog photographer she'd get one to carry them both

Seriously, I think it looks great for being a camera bag. I would love to have a leather camera bag, although I would have it somewhat more masculin, like an old school briefcase. Or like an old doctors bag, that kind of opening could probably be made to be great for opening while the bag is worn.

GKR1 · Nov 11, 2010

I see f2 has been recommended over and over, however, I do not know how the 4 dividers that do not change in size can be helpful. Also can the padded dividers hold the 500 series body with 80mm lens attached? Are you guys buying separate dividers?
Any pics of how you have your laid out?

Thanks

Katie · Nov 11, 2010

Hmmm, that would be nice. Does anyone have the F2 that they could post pics of the inside WITH GEAR. I have the distagon 50 for the Hasselblad, which is considerably longer than my old 80C.

Mainecoonmaniac · Nov 12, 2010

Here it is. The bag is my old beat up friend. It's over 20 years old and still holding up. http://gallery.me.com/iphone/mainecoonmaniac/100082#0

Q.G. · Nov 12, 2010

The gallery link doesn't work when embedded.

Mainecoonmaniac · Nov 12, 2010

Thanks for the heads up

Q.G. said:
The gallery link doesn't work when embedded.

I'm using my iPhone and can't fix it until Monday

rpsawin · Nov 12, 2010

Another vote for the Domke F2.

Best regards,

Bob

Mainecoonmaniac · Nov 12, 2010

iPhones argh!

Q.G. said:
The gallery link doesn't work when embedded.

I hope this link to Flickr will show my old friend.

http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/mainecoonmaniac/5169993414/sizes/m/

Q.G. · Nov 12, 2010

Mainecoonmaniac said:
I hope this link to Flickr will show my old friend.

http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/mainecoonmaniac/5169993414/sizes/m/

Sorry to have to report that nothing is showing in my browser.
But i think the Dead Link Removed to the mac gallery will work as a Dead Link Removed.

P.S.

Tried it, and though slow, it does.

Back on topic: i don't like Domkes. Well made bags. Absolutely.
But they made them the wrong bags.
But to each his/her own!

GKR1 · Nov 12, 2010

I see canon gear in the linked photo.

How the does the 500 seies body with 80mm attached fit in the f2 bag? Any pics?

Thanks

mbsmith · Nov 12, 2010

GKR1 said:
I see canon gear in the linked photo.

How the does the 500 seies body with 80mm attached fit in the f2 bag? Any pics?

Thanks

Sorry, no pics...
I don't know about the 500 series, but I can fit my Bronica SQ-A with 80mm in my f2 with the same insert as in the photo (4 compartment) by laying it down or by standing the camera on its end. This is with the WLF and not the prism finder, and I have to take the speed grip off.

Mainecoonmaniac · Nov 12, 2010

I have a Canon 85mm f/1.8 and when it's attached to an F1n or FTB it fits into the big compartment. When I was young and foolish, a carried 2 Canon bodies and 5 prime FD lenses in that bag. Back then, I was told that zoom lenses were'nt as good. I'm not a pro anymore, but now I just carry 1 body and 2 lenses max. The Domke is sometimes too big so I switched over to a Crumpler 4 Million Dollar home. It's a great bag. I'm tired of back aches.

benjiboy · Nov 20, 2010

If you are going to buy a Domke bag be careful there are a lot of fakes about made in the Far East many of them on E bay, if you buy one get one from a reputable dealer, and if they are genuine they should have YKK zips fitted.

Anyone recommend a good bag for Hasselblad (and Bronica)?

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency