- Joined
- Sep 8, 2011
- Messages
- 71
- Format
- Large Format
A Mamiya C series camera is ideal for this, with its straight film path.Before I had Ken Ruth convert my Medalist II to 120 I would run the film through a 120 camera first, so I only had to manually spool it one way. I used my Rolleiflex, which lets you crank the film through without stopping if don't put it under the roller, but any camera would do.
My bathroom doesn't have a window so is ideal for respooling. Although toilet seats are made to be sat on, not so the lids. Learned that the hard way. So now I sit on the side of the bath.
I don't really understand this 120 to 620 custom 3D spool? I checked the link out and didn't see that. I like the spool adapters they have for other formats to 120 film, but saw nothing for 620 and cannot see how it would be possible to even make any kind of adapter for 120 to 620 since the spool sizes are so close.I purchased 120 to 620 Custom 3D Printed Spools from www.holgamods.com and chose from an array of colours (my preference was black), and never looked back at re spooling 120 film
to 620 spools.
They also offer different size adapters for different film formats...
You can find them on the bay as well!
I don't really understand this 120 to 620 custom 3D spool? I checked the link out and didn't see that. I like the spool adapters they have for other formats to 120 film, but saw nothing for 620 and cannot see how it would be possible to even make any kind of adapter for 120 to 620 since the spool sizes are so close.I purchased 120 to 620 Custom 3D Printed Spools from www.holgamods.com and chose from an array of colours (my preference was black), and never looked back at re spooling 120 film
to 620 spools.
They also offer different size adapters for different film formats...
You can find them on the bay as well!
Yes, I tried the trim method and gave up on that real fast. The tolerances on the Medalist are so tight you just spend far to much time trying to get that 120 spool down to 620 size for the Medalist. The first time I tried it it was so tight that I got two or three frames then my counter went wonky cause the toothed roller was stripping the film. I then went to re-spooling, but not without beginners error. The first two or three spools went fine and the results were fine also. Then disaster hit! My son was playing Rocket Football and it was team picture day. Well, I thought I'd bring my Medalist along and get some shots of the team also. I re-spooled some Fuji Velvia onto 620 spools and headed for the practice field. I thought I got some great shots until I got the film back from processing. Most of the shots were fantastic, but there were two that showed my re-spooling error. One was the team photo and all the player were fine except the two on the end. That's where the film hump/bulged was. Their face had the right perspective, but their shoulders were about 50" wide. They looked like boys heads on pro-football players bodies. One of the boys was a friend of mine down the road. When I showed him those transparency's he said he absolutely had to have a print made of that one shot. He loved it and said he was going to put one on the wall of his office at work. I just cut the frame and gave it to him since I didn't even want to mess with it. That was around 25+ years ago or so and I've learned much since then. When I got my first Madalist I could still buy plenty of 620 Kodak in both B&W (Verichrome was my favorite) and color. I now re-spool using the re-tape method and have never once had a problem since. I have hundreds of cameras (yes, my wife tells me I'm a camera hoarding idiot), but the Kodak Medalist II is my No.1 favorite of all of them. Of course the Kodak Monitor 620 isn't bad either.fwir, trimming down 120 won't fit in a Medalist. Even the new plastic 620 spools can jam.
I can't see how 120>120>620 can avoid the hump. The larger diameter of the 120 spool means that the non taped end of the film is going to be in a slightly different place than if 620 was the intermediate spool. If you've got an extra 620 spool, why bother with 120>120?
I understand that if you have extra 620 rolls it is easier to roll the film onto a 620 roll and then back onto another 620 roll. it helps keep the taped end aligned. (120 to 620 to 620) instead of unrolling a 120 and then winding it on a 620.
I have not done it yet, but I read about it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?