• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Any suggestions for a paper developer with good longevity?


I'm looking for longevity of the working strength developer since I have limited time for printing and would prefer to spend that time printing rather than mixing chemistry. I usually buy the developer in the 500ml bottles so I'm less worried about the concentrate going off.
 
I tend to get good results with Kodak Polymax T, both in print quality and in shelf life. I don't print that often and when I do it's usually only a few sheets through the developer per session.
When I mix a small batch of working solution (usually 500-750ml), I can use it in trays (my sessions are usually about 3-4 hours) and then store it in a full, tightly capped PET bottle afterwards for at least two months and still get good results when reusing it in the next session(s).
I keep track of the number of prints I've put through it and I easily get the 32 sheets 8x10" per liter of working solution with very good print quality, even after two months.

Unfortunately, Polymax T doesn't seem to be available anywhere in the EU currently, so I'm looking at alternatives too.
In the past I've used Adotol Konstant, which works and keeps quite well too but takes up a lot of space in my small chemicals-cupboard since I'd need to mix 5 liters at once and then store all of it for a longer period of time.
So a liquid concentrate would probably be more convenient.

Adox Neutol NE seems to go off fairy quickly and I haven't been able to store the working solution even for a few days, although I've only tested this developer twice with a couple of small 100ml concentrate bottles to see if it would work for me.

The mentioned Moersch ECO4812 seems like a good candidate, the keeping properties (8 months for working solution, 2-4 years for the concentrate) are simply brilliant!
What confuses me is that it's stated to be a neutral tone developer but in the description on mr Moersch's website it's also mentioned to probably be the best warmtone developer in the world.
As a somewhat darkroom rookie I'm not sure what to expect when used with neutral tone papers
I mainly use Ilford MGIV RC and MGV RC, Fomabrom FB & Fomaspeed RC Variant papers and I'm not sure how the prints would turn out on such neutral tone papers, compared to any other neutral tone developer? Would they be just neutral toned or will they turn out much warmer?

Another developer that has my interest but can't find a lot of information on, is Ilford Japan Silverchrome BW paper developer. Does anyone have any experience with it?
Reading the MSDS as a rookie with no proper chemistry knowledge, it seems to be at least somewhat similar to Kodak Polymax T so it could have similar keeping properties, or am I completely wrong here?
 

Wow! That is really uneconomic! The larger quantity you buy the cheaper it becomes. Apart from the one time I have mentioned when I kept the solution overnight I always only use it for one session. I don't know how much a half litre bottle costs, but buying 1 litre and decanting half of it into a half litre bottle you will already start to make a saving. Apart from the problem that part used developer also 'goes off' more quickly you almost certainly get reduced activity and less quality with a print.

I know a 1 litre bottle in UK is £15 (about 20$) I can buy 5 litres for £31 (38$) Split a 5 litre bottle into 10 1/2 litre bottles the unused developer will keep for at least 2 years! I know this as a fact. Ilford are very conservative in the life of unused but correctly stored developers. Fresh mixed ID11 film developer in a glass bottle will keep for AT LEAST the same time.

When you consider the cost of film and paper compared to the price of new developer it really doesn't add up.
 
One more vote for developer 130, which is sold as 1L to 8L kits of stock solution by Photographer's Formulary.

I've never had it go bad on me, and time seems to have no effect on it! I keep the stock solution for months in HDPE bottles.

I use it 1+1 and monitor usage according to the recommendations of PF. A very well-used solution will work more slowly, but it will still work. By that point, I dump and mix again.
 

It is certainly much cheaper to buy the 5L bottle than 500ml bottles - the difference is about 2x here in the US. But I shied away from buying the larger quantities since I was under the impression that it would go bad long before I was able to use it. But it sounds like Ilford is very conservative when stating the longevity of its concentrated chemicals.
 

If you are filling the developer back into a plastic bottle, holding that volume or just a little more and the bottle is tightly capped, You can use the developer over several printing sessions. This is true for D72(Dektol) and many others.
 
I mix ID-62 myself. Just a few raw chemicals and measuring spoons. I have two liters of working solution that is going on day four in the darkroom (albeit, not a whole lot of prints each day). I store the developer in a two-liter bottle between sessions.

There is the initial investment in chemicals, but the developer itself is only pennies per liter. Even if it didn't last a fairly long time, it would be economical.

Doremus
 
RalphLambrecht said:
If you are filling the developer back into a plastic bottle, holding that volume or just a little more and the bottle is tightly capped, You can use the developer over several printing sessions. This is true for D72(Dektol) and many others.
Click to expand...

I saved the developer (1L) from my last printing session in a tightly capped 1L Jobo bottle . I'll reuse it for my next printing session and see how it goes.
 
My favourite print developers are 130 and LPD.... but for day-to-day printing and small work prints i use Ilford. Multigrade. Like BMbikerider .....i find it very economical and i always buy developers in the largest quantity possible. I never decant Multigrade from the 5 litre container and it works fine even after the colour changes.
 

I've used Bromophen for years. I prepare the 5L of stock solution. Next I divide up the stock into 19 very full 250ml PET bottles. When I want to print I take a 250ml bottle, dilute to 1 L. I use it then store it in a 1 L Jobo bottle. I don't store the working solution much more than a week.
I never leave solutions sitting in open trays. Keeps chemistry fresh and trays nice and clean.

Bromophen and LPD (and similar products) are known for good keeping and zero metol.
 

Just to emphasise I use screw top glass bottles with plastic inserts and not just any old bottles. Just to reiterate when I break into a 1/2 litre bottle I further decant it into 100cc glass bottles with the same type of screw top that way you only have one small bottle open at once so this stops or retards any degradation before the 1/2 litre bottle can be used.

However the original 1 litre or 1/2 litre plastic bottles may be almost as good. The plastic is probably thick enough to stop oxygen permeating through.
 
Last edited:

Buy the bulk chemicals (from Artcraft if you're in the US, they're consistently the cheapest) and mix your own D-72.

Just take care to observe good lab practices - protect your eyes, hands, and breathing with a appropriate coverings and mix according to instructions. Make sure you're working in good ventilation.

The beauty of this is that you an make enough stock for the foreseeable future and it will run out before it goes bad. Just be sure to store in brown glass bottles with polycone style caps and the stock will be fine on the shelf for some months. (unless made specifically for the task, plastic bottles are permeable to air which will cause the developer to oxidize prematurely.) The raw chemicals - if stored in a clean, dry place, should be good for a very long time.
 
BMbikerider said:
Just to emphasise I use screw top glass bottles with plastic inserts and not just any old bottles.
Click to expand...

I store my film developing chemicals in amber glass bottles with plastic inserts. I'll probably order some for my printing chemicals as well. At the moment I'm using Jobo brown plastic bottles for my printing chemistry that are supposed to be ok for chemical storage, but maybe not as good as glass.
 

When I read about a good warm tone paper developer, I look up the MSDS to see if there's any information that might help me in my DIY mixing. I notice that in the Moersch 4812 there is "1,4 dihydroxybenzene potassium salt"

1,4 dihydroxybenzene is hydroquinone, but I've never come across a potassium salt of it. Could this be the secret to its long life?
 
RalphLambrecht said:
If you are filling the developer back into a plastic bottle, holding that volume or just a little more and the bottle is tightly capped, You can use the developer over several printing sessions. This is true for D72(Dektol) and many others.
Click to expand...

I routinely keep my working strength LPD in bottles after a printing session. It lasts...well I haven't found a limit. I once glanced at the label on the bottle (I put a piece of masking tape on it and write what's in it, dilution, and the date I mixed/diluted it) and thought, "two months old, I'll give it a try..." and it worked fine. Only when pouring it back into the bottle did I notice it was an old bottle that got pushed to the back and forgotten and was dated the previous YEAR, so it was fourteen months old. Full plastic bottle with air squeezed out. Again this is working strength dilution.
 

I'll second the Ansco 130.

I've had that s developer in use in a year plus usage and it keeps on giving.

If you mix it from components, use all the Glycin to mix up a larger batch, jug the excess liquid and when you're ready, use it, with about 5% of the old dark developer, to season it, it'll still be good to go.

Only Amidol will give blacker blacks, on fb papers, IMO.
 
Thanks for all of the recommendations. I just ordered some liquid LPD and am looking forward to giving it a try.
 
I use brown glass 1 ltr bottles to store my LPD. Works great. Check with a beer/brewery supply shop or Amazon...
 

Attempting to answer my own question. Looking up the CAS number from the Moersch web site for this compound, it is not simply hydroquinone plus K+ but something else. Probably not easily available for hobbyists. Not often we come across a new developing agent.
 

Attachments

  • Hydroquinonesulfonic acid potassium salt.jpg
    12.9 KB · Views: 96
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register