Any news on Lodima Fine Art/Azo? [assorted speculation]

User Removed

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Messages
1,296
Format
Plastic Cameras
jgjbowen said:
well gang, I see Dagor 77 has just posted 2 500 sheet boxes of grade 4 Azo....
Click to expand...


...and we were thinking that the 11x14 sold for a high price, wait till you see these. I must say... I might have to take part in the bidding war for a box.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
And does grade 4 have the keeping properties of the softer grades?
 

User Removed

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Messages
1,296
Format
Plastic Cameras
David A. Goldfarb said:
And does grade 4 have the keeping properties of the softer grades?
Click to expand...

I don't believe as well. I've used some G4 in the past and it matched G3 nearly perfect. I still have about 15 sheets of it left. I also have some G1 that is of the same age, and that seems to still be about what G1 azo would look like.
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format
Well, in spite of the fact that everyone is now out of the business of making silver chloride papers there is still an apparent high level of interest in the product, as evidenced by the demand for existing AZO stock and the willinginess of many to plop down a lot of money in the hope that Lodima will be a suitable substitute.

That being the case, I wonder why one of the few remaining players, Ilford for example, don't step up to the plate to satisfy the market with a high quality silver chloride paper? If anyone out there could make a good product it is Ilford.

Sandy King
 

michael9793

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
2,018
Location
Fort Myers,
Format
ULarge Format
If michael and Paula had a life supplly do you think they would go to the expense and time to make lodima paper? No! I have a 1000 sheets of 8x10 Gr2 and the same in gr3. I have 500 sheets of 20x24 Gr2 for my 8x20. but my negatives are not contrasty enought to use the grade two. So Like most of you I have been trying different papers. Yes I just got to like forte and guess what ? maybe I should stop liking papers since the last three I liked are now no longer being made.
 

pelerin

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
343
Format
Multi Format

Perhaps a poll (like the ULF interest on) showing what sizes, grades, and quantities folks were interested in would help. Obviously Simon was aware of the other poll and the group was able to influence the offering (e.g., w/ regard to 4x10). However, they are already making film and it is simply a custom cutting operation, engineering and manufacturing a new paper would seem to be a problem of much greater scope. I wonder if there really is market of sufficient size to make it economically sensible.
Celac.
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format

I wonder if the coating issues are not related to the relatively thin stock that Michael and Paula like for their own work. I understand from PE that using stock this thin introduces some coating problems that would not exist with a thicker paper. I don't personally know why Michael and Paula prefer the single weight paper, but I personally would be much happier with a double weight paper.

Sandy
 

jgjbowen

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
879
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Large Format
I think I read on the Azo Forum where Michael stated Grade 4 and grade 5 didn't have the same long shelf life as grade 2 and 3....then again it could have been here on APUG and PE who made that statement....I hate getting old!
 

Alex Hawley

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2003
Messages
2,892
Location
Kansas, USA
Format
Large Format

I found that once I started using single weight that I liked it quite well. Going back to double weight seemed a bit cumbersome. But its not that big a deal to me. According to PE, the double weight is easier to run on the machines-far less scrap; and it can be run at much faster speeds.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
The issues include the thin support, the tint of the support and the bad results that M&P have getten so far when they scaled it up. It apparently did not scale well in their chosen facility.

PE
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Scott;

It really depends a lot on paper quality, coating speed, applied 'wet' material, machine drying capacity. I just can't say for them how bad or good it might be.

I've said it before... It is like a high speed web of wet tissue paper running through a machine. (not that bad really, but not good)

Anyhow, tearoffs and other problems rise as thickness of the paper goes down, and thickness of the wet emulsion goes up.

PE
 

jgjbowen

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
879
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Large Format
It's getting a little expensive to stock up on Azo. The same person just purchased 2 500 sheet boxes of old grade 4 Azo. The first box went for $1,725 and the second went for $1,135.

That seems like a lot of $$ for what will probably prove to be grade 3 Azo.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

User Removed

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Messages
1,296
Format
Plastic Cameras

Wow. That is all I can say.

After testing some of the same age G4 myself, and others I know who have tested it as well...we all found it to be nearly EXACT to G3.

I hope Michael and Paula do not see this and think they can get away with selling the new Lodima for this much!
 

jgjbowen

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
879
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Large Format
Keep in mind this is the "spot" price, and while there is someone who is willing to pay this much, you obviously wouldn't be able to sell a thousand 500 sheet boxes for this much...

Maybe Michael and Paula will see this and auction some of their grade 3 stash to help pay for Lodima...
 

Alex Hawley

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2003
Messages
2,892
Location
Kansas, USA
Format
Large Format
I just finished print-testing several papers. Haven't toned nor dried them yet, but I can say without hesitation there are good alternatives available to the Azo/Amidol routine, in both developers and papers. I'll provide an in-depth thread in several days on what I think.

Folks, take a look at the Slavich paper, available from Freestyle. I think its very promising. Comes in single weight as well as double weight, grades 2, 3, and 4. I've just been playing with grade 3. More to follow in a few days.

If the Lodima paper comes to be, I'm sure it will be good. Until then, I'm not waiting nor wishing for the promised magic bullet, nor crying for the good ol' days of Azo. Azo is gone, and once these secret (and now very expensive) stashes are gone, there will be no more ever again. I've a mind to sell off the few sheets of Grade 3 I have. Any takers? (PS-I plan to profit on it.)
 

jgjbowen

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
879
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Large Format
Does anyone know who Bluelester is on Ebay? I see this photographer is located in San Francisco. So far in February alone this photographer has spent $4,373 plus shipping to acquire 1,900 sheets of 8x10 Azo.

I guess Bluelester isn't waiting for Lodima.
 

Alex Hawley

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2003
Messages
2,892
Location
Kansas, USA
Format
Large Format
No idea who Bluelester is. Everyone should spend their money as the see fit. If my prints were selling at $500 to $1000 each, and I were selling fifty to a hundred per year, I'd be buying as much Azo as I could right now. But, as it stands ------.
 

Curt

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
4,618
Location
Pacific Nort
Format
Multi Format
How much is two unopened 500 sheet boxes of grade 3 worth? I may just put them up for sale on the bay to help finance my sons college.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Three older threads speculating about Lodima merged. This thread is separate from the thread with official reports from Michael A. Smith and member responses to those reports and impressions of the paper itself--

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…