Gene,
I did not list this film as "short dated". The whole page at my website listed 35mm slide film as "outdate" on every film.
"Short dated" has never been into my language to describe films. In my business of selling films, I usually list film as "fresh", "dated xx/200x", or if I am not sure about the date of the film, either give a date range like 2002-2004, or just say "Outdate" without a date. I don't like the term of "short dated film" because some dealers used it for both "close dated" film that is fresh, or "outdated film". For close dated film, I usually say it is still fresh, for example, dated 3/2007. Straightforward.
You told me you ordered 36 exp. films not 24 exp. I decided "The Customer is Always Right" and just send you the second package of 36 exp films to resolve the issue. In communications I have told you I am sending you the second package of 36 exp. films without paper boxes, and "in my best knowledge that is dated around 2002-2004, like the one you ordered". "If you can use I can send you 20 rolls of those. If the film is no good you can return at any time. Otherwise I will just refund to you to make sure you are not getting anything you don't use." And I clearly stated in my email:""I checked again the shipping record. There was one package sent out to you. If it is lost so be it. If not please turn it to me. That should contain 24 exposure films instead of 36."
Your email response to me is, "PLEASE SEND WHAT YOU HAVE. I DON'T CARE IF IT IS IN BOXES. AS LONG AS IT IS IN THE PLASTIC SNAP-CANNISTERS. IF I GET THE "PREVIOUS" SHIPMENT, I WILL PAY YOU FOR IT." So outdated film is not a total monster to you. And you knew and are ready to accept that second batch of film has an unknown but outdate date of a few years. You knew there is an previous package with 24 exp. film inside and you can return it but you opt to keep it and pay for it. I don't understand why you forgot what you have expressed in both phone conversation and emails. According to the time stamp your email was "Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:31 AM".
Also in today's APUG post you did not mention I have told you I am sending you the second package, and did not mention you have received USPS delivery confirmation number for the second package. (The package was given to USPS two days ago).
I have all five copies of your recent emails in my archive. From your email I can see you used all UPPER CASEs and never used lower cases in our private email communication. In APUG you seems know to use lower cases. Being in the Internet since Bitnet and Usenet time, I can see what kind of net user you are. Some net users abuse the Internet with strange split personality. I don't know if you are one of them but it is truly a pleasure to hear that you are not buying from me. I don't like dealing with rude and dishonest buyers.