Ansel Adams Zone System - skin in shadow

Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 16
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 1
  • 0
  • 17
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 1
  • 2
  • 31
Tōrō

H
Tōrō

  • 4
  • 0
  • 39

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,825
Messages
2,781,473
Members
99,718
Latest member
nesunoio
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Sep 20, 2020
Messages
11
Location
LA
Format
Digital
Hey everyone! I have a pretty straight forward new person to exposure question. I’ve been learning a lot about exposure through using Ansel Adams zone system. (I mostly expose/color video). But lately I’ve been questioning something and I can’t seem to find the answer anywhere:

I understand there are certain zones for “lit skin”, for example I know that on a sunny day an average caucasian skin tone will hit around the 6 mark in sunlight. But what about when someone is in the shade? For example if my subject has half of their face lit by the sunset but they are turned almost profile so that almost all of their face towards camera is in shadow, what zone would that unlit cheek fall under? Or for that matter if their whole face was in shade where would it fall? I’ve been testing a lot of images (photographs and stills from movies) and definitely seeing that the skin falls in a darker place when in shade. But where should it fall? Is there anywhere written out what zone each type of skin should fall under in shade?

thanks so much!
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,977
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
The point of the zone system is to place subject areas on whatever zone you want. And it all depends on the effect you're after... drama, or natural rendition. How are you metring? Light metre? In camera metre?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,935
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The problem with your question is the word "should".
The Zone where the shadowed skin is either placed or will fall depends entirely on how you want it to appear in the print.
Do you want the shadowed skin to appear bright and luminous, with the brightly lit skin up into the highlight shoulder? Then place the shadowed skin in Zone VI.
Do you want the shadowed skin to appear dark and foreboding, with just a hint of mysterious detail, with the brightly lit skin appearing as a normal midtone, then place the brightly lit skin in Zone VI, and let the shadowed skin fall in Zone II or Zone III.
 

juan

Member
Joined
May 7, 2003
Messages
2,706
Location
St. Simons I
Format
Multi Format
Assuming the sun lit skin is VI and standard development, open shade skin would be about IV 1/2 to V. Deeper shade about IV or even a little darker. That’s been my experience in the kind of light I expose in.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,526
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
He said, caucasian skin...
That was merely a data point of prior knowledge. If one is going to wonder about the difference between sunlit and shade, one should also be aware that skin is not skin is not skin… even within the Caucasian race.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Joined
Sep 20, 2020
Messages
11
Location
LA
Format
Digital
Assuming the sun lit skin is VI and standard development, open shade skin would be about IV 1/2 to V. Deeper shade about IV or even a little darker. That’s been my experience in the kind of light I expose in.

that makes sense. So what if the entire Caucasian subject was in shade? Would IV 1/2 to V be a possible choice for landing for the whole face?
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,526
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Not zone system, but have you considered incident light metering?
 
OP
OP
Joined
Sep 20, 2020
Messages
11
Location
LA
Format
Digital
The problem with your question is the word "should".
The Zone where the shadowed skin is either placed or will fall depends entirely on how you want it to appear in the print.
Do you want the shadowed skin to appear bright and luminous, with the brightly lit skin up into the highlight shoulder? Then place the shadowed skin in Zone VI.
Do you want the shadowed skin to appear dark and foreboding, with just a hint of mysterious detail, with the brightly lit skin appearing as a normal midtone, then place the brightly lit skin in Zone VI, and let the shadowed skin fall in Zone II or Zone III.

This is VERY helpful. So if my Caucasian subject was entirely in shade and I wanted to go for a nice natural under a tree shade look where would that land in your opinion?
 
OP
OP
Joined
Sep 20, 2020
Messages
11
Location
LA
Format
Digital
That was merely a data point of prior knowledge. If one is going to wonder about the difference between sunlit and shade, one should also be aware that skin is not skin is not skin… even within the Caucasian race.

good to know and keep a lookout for! Thanks!
 
OP
OP
Joined
Sep 20, 2020
Messages
11
Location
LA
Format
Digital
Then you get into interpretation as others have discussed above. It would be a possible choice. There would also be others.

okay! So if I’m understanding right… shade has a lot more room for interpretation and artistic style… whereas fully sunlit faces have a little more of a straightforward place to land (at least following Ansel Adam’s system)?
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,977
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
That was merely a data point of prior knowledge. If one is going to wonder about the difference between sunlit and shade, one should also be aware that skin is not skin is not skin… even within the Caucasian race.

Yes. There are variations of course. It would be a judgement call on the photographer.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,526
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Jon, I hesitate to write this in public and hope you don't misinterpret that I'm hoping to help and definitely not intending to be condescending in any way... but my experience over the years is that when someone is asking about metering/exposure using the zone system with no/limited experience with "standard" general-coverage or incident metering they are quite often working against their goal. If not "against", certainly making life more difficult than necessary for the PRACTICAL application of photography.

I'm suggesting that a study/practicum in the "standard" metering techniques would set you up much better for figuring out zone system than starting with zone system. Honestly, over many years of photography I've found that these standard techniques are quite adequate more-often-than-not. In your example, I don't think zone system is the best approach from a practical perspective. Plus, it gives the basic knowledge from which one can exercise "judgement calls" based on photographer experience/knowledge.

If the Zone System enquiry is an educational endeavor... I completely understand... it's a fascinating approach. :smile:

BTW, from which "LA" do you hail: Louisiana, Los Angeles, or Lower Alabama?
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,589
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
Jon,

First, just to clarify, the Zone System with its 9 (or 10) Zones for "normal" was created for black-and-white film and darkroom printing. If you're exposing color, making videos, etc., then your medium is going to have a different potential dynamic range and the standard lists of what luminance subjects "should" be rendered in what Zones won't apply.

Next, the Zone System for b&w is based on "placing" a shadow value where you want it (this means basing your exposure on a shadow value to have it be rendered the tonality you want it in the final print) and then seeing where all the other values "fall." If you don't like where they fall, you can adjust development so they print more easily or rethink your image.

However, many portrait photographers "place" the lit skin tone and let the shadows, etc. "fall" where they may. In this case, the shaded skin value depends on the ratio of lighting between the lit area and the shaded area. In this case, then, you meter the lit skin, place it in Zone VI and then meter the shaded skin to see where it falls. Now if it falls where you don't want it to fall (e.g., in bright sunlight, shaded skin can be really dark), the usual remedy is to light the shadows somehow, either with fill flash or reflector, or filter the main light with, say a diffusing cloth, etc. (or wait for a cloudy day :smile: ). In studio settings, the lighting ratio is almost always the determining factor and lighting is adjusted to get shadows and lit areas to balance. In the field, you may be able, with black-and-white materials that is, to work out a scheme of exposure, development and print contrast manipulations to get an overly-contrasty ratio between lit and shaded skin under control to your liking. Still, carrying around that reflector is a really good and simple thing...

Deciding where you want that shaded skin to fall, i.e., how light or dark you want it to be in the final print, is something that the standard lists of what falls in what Zone can only give you guidelines for. Look at portraits, etc. and see what you like. You have to make a decision based on what you want in the final image. Want really luminous shadows? Shoot for Zone V or just a bit less. Want a dark, brooding look? Maybe Zone III or IV. Want that dramatic "Phantom of the Opera" effect? Get those shadows down to Zone I or II.

Best,

Doremus
 
OP
OP
Joined
Sep 20, 2020
Messages
11
Location
LA
Format
Digital
Jon, I hesitate to write this in public and hope you don't misinterpret that I'm hoping to help and definitely not intending to be condescending in any way... but my experience over the years is that when someone is asking about metering/exposure using the zone system with no/limited experience with "standard" general-coverage or incident metering they are quite often working against their goal. If not "against", certainly making life more difficult than necessary for the PRACTICAL application of photography.

I'm suggesting that a study/practicum in the "standard" metering techniques would set you up much better for figuring out zone system than starting with zone system. Honestly, over many years of photography I've found that these standard techniques are quite adequate more-often-than-not. In your example, I don't think zone system is the best approach from a practical perspective. Plus, it gives the basic knowledge from which one can exercise "judgement calls" based on photographer experience/knowledge.

If the Zone System enquiry is an educational endeavor... I completely understand... it's a fascinating approach. :smile:

BTW, from which "LA" do you hail: Louisiana, Los Angeles, or Lower Alabama?

Thanks so much for your honesty. I don’t feel like you are condescending at all! I definitely know my knowledge is limited. Ive learned color grading from Matti Haapaja (you may have seen his videos) and a course he did and he was using Ansel Adams which got me started on that. I need to learn more about incident metering it sounds like. I’ve gotten the impression that incident metering is more what you do when actually TAKING the photos. I’m an editor and mostly work on projects recorded and taken by others… does this skill set still apply to me? Thanks! Oh and I’m in Los Angeles!
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,935
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I’m an editor and mostly work on projects recorded and taken by others… does this skill set still apply to me?
Probably not - unless you feel you need to know about it in order to communicate with the cinematographer.
All of the Zone System techniques we have been discussing are related to what the "taking" photographer is seeking to do.
So as an example, if the cinemaphotographer was seeking to shoot a scene where the human subject was intended to be essentially silhouetted against the sun, the cinemaphotographer may have intentionally placed the shadowed side of the face into near darkness (Zone II) and you as an editor might want to know that, in order to make editing decisions that support the cinemaphotographer's intention.
Essentially, you are doing as an editor some of what I used to do when I was colour printing for others. In those circumstances, if the negative was accompanied by detailed instructions from the photographer, a note indicating that the shadowed side of the face was intended to be in Zone II, I would have a decent idea what I should do as a printer.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I agree with Brian.

Jon, I hesitate to write this in public and hope you don't misinterpret that I'm hoping to help and definitely not intending to be condescending in any way... but my experience over the years is that when someone is asking about metering/exposure using the zone system with no/limited experience with "standard" general-coverage or incident metering they are quite often working against their goal. If not "against", certainly making life more difficult than necessary for the PRACTICAL application of photography.

I'm suggesting that a study/practicum in the "standard" metering techniques would set you up much better for figuring out zone system than starting with zone system. Honestly, over many years of photography I've found that these standard techniques are quite adequate more-often-than-not. In your example, I don't think zone system is the best approach from a practical perspective. Plus, it gives the basic knowledge from which one can exercise "judgement calls" based on photographer experience/knowledge.

If the Zone System enquiry is an educational endeavor... I completely understand... it's a fascinating approach. :smile:

BTW, from which "LA" do you hail: Louisiana, Los Angeles, or Lower Alabama?

As always Doremus states what my thoughts on the Zone System are much better than I can.

Jon,

First, just to clarify, the Zone System with its 9 (or 10) Zones for "normal" was created for black-and-white film and darkroom printing. If you're exposing color, making videos, etc., then your medium is going to have a different potential dynamic range and the standard lists of what luminance subjects "should" be rendered in what Zones won't apply.

Next, the Zone System for b&w is based on "placing" a shadow value where you want it (this means basing your exposure on a shadow value to have it be rendered the tonality you want it in the final print) and then seeing where all the other values "fall." If you don't like where they fall, you can adjust development so they print more easily or rethink your image.

However, many portrait photographers "place" the lit skin tone and let the shadows, etc. "fall" where they may. In this case, the shaded skin value depends on the ratio of lighting between the lit area and the shaded area. In this case, then, you meter the lit skin, place it in Zone VI and then meter the shaded skin to see where it falls. Now if it falls where you don't want it to fall (e.g., in bright sunlight, shaded skin can be really dark), the usual remedy is to light the shadows somehow, either with fill flash or reflector, or filter the main light with, say a diffusing cloth, etc. (or wait for a cloudy day :smile: ). In studio settings, the lighting ratio is almost always the determining factor and lighting is adjusted to get shadows and lit areas to balance. In the field, you may be able, with black-and-white materials that is, to work out a scheme of exposure, development and print contrast manipulations to get an overly-contrasty ratio between lit and shaded skin under control to your liking. Still, carrying around that reflector is a really good and simple thing...

Deciding where you want that shaded skin to fall, i.e., how light or dark you want it to be in the final print, is something that the standard lists of what falls in what Zone can only give you guidelines for. Look at portraits, etc. and see what you like. You have to make a decision based on what you want in the final image. Want really luminous shadows? Shoot for Zone V or just a bit less. Want a dark, brooding look? Maybe Zone III or IV. Want that dramatic "Phantom of the Opera" effect? Get those shadows down to Zone I or II.

Best,

Doremus

Also in Los Angeles.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,685
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
As you are editing the value of the Zone System is a standard ruler when discussing with your photographers where you and they think the skin tone or for that matter any object in a given scene should fall, should that house be in zone 7 or 8? I am assuming that you editing digital files and not film.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom