• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

An APUG.org Oath/Certification?

Claire Senft said:
Carol the question is already answered but I would add that asking a question to get information is far from being nuts. What is nuts is the tendency of us males when having gotten lost and refusing to ask for diections.
Click to expand...

What!!!!! "We don't need not stinking directions!!!!" it then becomes and adventrue, your never lost! at least thats what my wife likes to call it!

LOL

Dave
 
Andy K, my good man, are you saying that every spelling but the original English spelling is incorrect? Do you maintain that English spelling and usage is still stuck back in the English of Chaucer or is otherwise incorrect? Please further enlighten us poor ignorant colonials.
 
I have also found it interesting here in the states, we seem to have:

Montanian English
Texas English
Californian English
Louisiana English
etc.
etc.

And now we have Spanglish....have not quite figured that one out yet,

And after spending a few days with Les Mclean and his friend, I heard another couple of types of english, one they said was Northern English and the other said his was correct and said it was Southern english!

LOL

Dave
 
Claire Senft said:
Andy K, my good man, are you saying that every spelling but the original English spelling is incorrect?
Click to expand...

Yes I am. Unless the spelling was updated by the English, in England, and not by a foreigner.
 
Isn't spelling just a TAD off topic?

What about the idea of a "Certificate of Authenticity" or some such - under the aegis - or ? - of APUG?

God idea? - Bad? - Or plain ?
 
From earlier in the thread...


Andy K said:
Good idea, but stickers/stamps would be worthless if Sean/APUG have not actually seen the print.
Click to expand...
 
I don't think that linking our work with APUG and its principles, and dedication to traditional photography would necessarily infer some sort of approval by Sean or any of the members here. I certainly could use the PPA logo on my work if I chose to... and I have never considered submitting my work to them for approval or anything else.

The integrity of the information would depend solely on the bent and values of the photographer. At the same time, anyone violation the principles could be booted form APUG (no change from the present) and would forfeit his/her legal claim to the Logo's usage.

What about it, Sean/ anyone else... good idea or what?
 
mrcallow said:
Murry these are great! Could I use them for the conference?
Click to expand...

You bet. Feel free to massage them as you see fit...as noted earlier the "British Enlgish" bit is a tad weird, but as it was a quote I couldn't change it.

Murray
 

Claire. Thank you so much for this bit of advice. I tried my 50mm 2.8 lens out on my latest roll of 35mm. It made a big difference to the amount of detail I could see. Much appreciated.
 
if you were to identify the process on the back of the matt, rather than use some phrase that NO ONE outside this forum understands (Analog or Analoge), why not just use the description that most curators in museums around the world use. Gelatin Silver Print. They have done the work for us no point in re-inventing the wheel.

lee\c
 
Last edited by a moderator:

In the end, Lee's probably right. For now I'm going to write on the back of my prints and mounts; Gelatin Sliver Print - Hand Made By Artist - !00% Non-Digital.

That about sums up everything that's important to me.

Murray
 
MurrayMinchin said:
In the end, Lee's probably right. For now I'm going to write on the back of my prints and mounts; Gelatin Sliver Print - Hand Made By Artist - !00% Non-Digital.

That about sums up everything that's important to me.

Murray
Click to expand...
Murray,
The problem with that, as I see it, is it sounds defensive. There's no need to mention what it is not.

By the way, I take the extra step of drymounting a label on the back of each of my prints, explaining that it is an archivally processed silver gelatin print, handmade by me. I also provide a certificate of print authenticity for each purchaser, listing the date the image was made, as well as the date the print was made.
 
Stick this on your camera.
 
Arigram, that is fantastic! I want one! Can you do it in a fabric patch model, so I can sew it on a soft case? The cover of my Rangefinder is old and worn...

 
Bruce, you are free to do whatever you want with it, but I don't want Intel to be suing my ass!
I needed to make a small correction as when I made it I wasn't paying that much attention during the two minutes it took me...
 

Attachments

  • FilmInside.jpg
    47.9 KB · Views: 117
I totally agree, Lee. Most people understand Gelatin Silver Print.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register