An Accidental Entry Into LF

High st

A
High st

  • 4
  • 0
  • 36
Flap

D
Flap

  • 0
  • 0
  • 18
Chiaro o scuro?

D
Chiaro o scuro?

  • 2
  • 0
  • 229

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,215
Messages
2,787,959
Members
99,837
Latest member
eeffock
Recent bookmarks
0

summicron1

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
2,920
Location
Ogden, Utah
Format
Multi Format
Turns out the film holder I have is for film packs -- evidently not what I needed...

you can safely put that into the metal recycling bin. No film packs made any more.

film holders such as have been discussed are readily available. don't get confused by differences between "graflex" and "graphic" backs -- all 4 by 5 film holders sold today are for your camera unless someone specifically says they are for a "graflex" camera, but those are all more collectibles.

ct
 

smieglitz

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
1,950
Location
Climax, Michigan
Format
Large Format
you can safely put that into the metal recycling bin. No film packs made any more.

Nooooo. Trade that thing to me for a film holder. The FPAs make great wetplate holders. And I use the metal from any old film packs to adjust the focal plane for the glass plates.

BTW, the 1234 film pack adapter is for 4x5 so if it fits your camera back, you have a 4x5 camera.
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,110
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
Surely not.
I think the ground glass on a 4x5 would be around the size the OP quoted.
My Graphic Super is about that size.

Agreed. The image area on a film is smaller than the actual film size. Actually, the film itself is smaller than it claims to be as it's specified in the size a glass plate would be but as originally film was put into metal holders (septums) to allow it to fit in glass plate holders, the film will be slightly smaller.

The measured size of 4.75 x 3.75 sounds just right for 5x4.


Steve.
 
OP
OP

tryals15

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
34
Location
New Orleans
Format
Multi Format
Agreed. The image area on a film is smaller than the actual film size. Actually, the film itself is smaller than it claims to be as it's specified in the size a glass plate would be but as originally film was put into metal holders (septums) to allow it to fit in glass plate holders, the film will be slightly smaller.

The measured size of 4.75 x 3.75 sounds just right for 5x4.


Steve.

I like this conclusion better... :D
 
OP
OP

tryals15

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
34
Location
New Orleans
Format
Multi Format
Nooooo. Trade that thing to me for a film holder. The FPAs make great wetplate holders. And I use the metal from any old film packs to adjust the focal plane for the glass plates.

BTW, the 1234 film pack adapter is for 4x5 so if it fits your camera back, you have a 4x5 camera.

We might be able to work something out... I have been reading about wet plate lately and, while I don't think I'll ever take the leap, I think it looks like a fascinating process!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mark

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Messages
5,703
That will turn out to be the most expensive 3 dollar purchase you ever made. This crap is addictive, and bigger drugs and processes are just around the corner. Pretty soon you will be whoring yourself to support a 20x24 10 sheet a day habit. Quit now.:D
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
That will turn out to be the most expensive 3 dollar purchase you ever made. This crap is addictive, and bigger drugs and processes are just around the corner. Pretty soon you will be whoring yourself to support a 20x24 10 sheet a day habit. Quit now.:D

True the first part (most expensive three dollars..) not necessarily true the rest. I'm still pretty happy with 4x5, mainly because I have two 4x5 enlargers and don't want to limit myself to contact prints. Now if I ever stumble on a deal close enough to take advantage of on an 8x10 enlarger... but I could resist buying that and the camera and the lenses and the film holders, really I could, I could quit any time I wanted...
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
That will turn out to be the most expensive 3 dollar purchase you ever made. This crap is addictive, and bigger drugs and processes are just around the corner. Pretty soon you will be whoring yourself to support a 20x24 10 sheet a day habit. Quit now.:D

What the OP needs to do is acquire a very expensive drug addiction. Then, he gets off the drugs and uses the camera gear he will be able to buy (with the money he's not spending on South American toads) as therapy. Everyone's happy.:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP

tryals15

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
34
Location
New Orleans
Format
Multi Format
I feel as though we may have wandered into the weeds here... :smile:

Back to the subject at hand.

It seems that both back braces for the rails of one of these cameras are broken. I've looked here and online, and unless I missed it I can't seem to find any information on possible replacements (Except to say replacement parts are scarce...). I also am curious how to get around the baffles to unscrew the mounting screws... Ideas?
 

tessar

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
355
Location
Calgary, AB,
Format
Multi Format
Hi tryals15, just FYI: Your Speed is pre-1955 (side rangefinder); the Crown is post-1955 (top rangefinder). I was mystified by the 3 types of Graflex and Graphic backs till I found this good explanation, complete with illustrations:
http://lommen9.home.xs4all.nl/holders/index.html
Your Crown definitely has the Graflok back which looks to be in good complete shape, so I assume it's the Speed that has the broken rail braces. You didn't include a picture of the back on the Speed, so I can't tell if it has the Graphic, or spring, back (pre-1951) or the Graflok back (post-1951). Probably the Graflok back, since the spring back doesn't have what I'd call rail braces.
I've been using Graphic press and Graflex SLR cameras for years and really like them. The people on the Graflex site were happy to help me out when I started. I recommend a visit:
http://www.graflex.org/
One member, 45pss, is a technical expert and has contributed more than 1000 posts. I'm sure he could give you some advice re those broken braces.
 
OP
OP

tryals15

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
34
Location
New Orleans
Format
Multi Format
Hi tryals15, just FYI: Your Speed is pre-1955 (side rangefinder); the Crown is post-1955 (top rangefinder). I was mystified by the 3 types of Graflex and Graphic backs till I found this good explanation, complete with illustrations:
http://lommen9.home.xs4all.nl/holders/index.html
Your Crown definitely has the Graflok back which looks to be in good complete shape, so I assume it's the Speed that has the broken rail braces. You didn't include a picture of the back on the Speed, so I can't tell if it has the Graphic, or spring, back (pre-1951) or the Graflok back (post-1951). Probably the Graflok back, since the spring back doesn't have what I'd call rail braces.
I've been using Graphic press and Graflex SLR cameras for years and really like them. The people on the Graflex site were happy to help me out when I started. I recommend a visit:
http://www.graflex.org/
One member, 45pss, is a technical expert and has contributed more than 1000 posts. I'm sure he could give you some advice re those broken braces.

Wow, that first site is great. I definitely have the Graflok back (same on both). The rails I was talking about are the bellow rails. There is about a 2 inch section of rail all the way in the back that has a metal guide holding it down, the braces are in good shape on one camera, but they are all busted up on the other. Does that make sense? I didn't realize there was a forum on graflex.org; I'm headed there now.
 

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
Not quite true about LFPI. I've been spanked a couple of times there... deservedly, I'll add.:tongue: And... APUG members complaining about opinionated folks? Huh?:wink:
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
If you think this place is bad, go visit LFPF. They're a bunch of opinionated eclectic eccentric characters, some threads go on for pages while off topic. I think the mods have given up.:wink:

It, and this, are two of the most on-topic forums I visit of several, almost stultifying so to me at times. A matter of taste I guess.

And yes, THIS part of this post and the next sentence are OT.

One of my favorite private pilot forums is a place where thread creep, more like thread warp drive, is all but encouraged as an art form. I find it frankly liberating.

Back to topic: LFPF is mostly pretty on topic and a really good place for those interested in LF.
 

k_jupiter

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
2,569
Location
san jose, ca
Format
Multi Format
Amazed at the misinformed advice you got here.

It is of course a Pacemaker 4x5 Speed. The back is a Grafloc, makes little difference unless you get a roll film holder or Graphmatic multiple film back.

Get some nice plastic film holders, Fidelity, whatever. They are all pretty much the same. Check the darkslides for cracks, edges for light leaks. Clean them well, blow them out well. Pull the back off, clean the focus screen, don't get the fresnel lens put back in wrong.
Clean the lens carefully, do a time test on the shutter. Keep your eyes peeled for a reasonable 150mm modern lens, but don't get rid of the original lens/shutter setup.

Have fun, spend money.

tim in san jose
 

k_jupiter

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
2,569
Location
san jose, ca
Format
Multi Format
Amazed at some of the misinformed advice you got here.

It is of course a Pacemaker 4x5 Speed. The if the back is the same as the Crown, it is a Grafloc, makes little difference unless you get a roll film holder or Graphmatic multiple film back. The Crown looks nice also.

Get some nice plastic film holders, Fidelity, whatever. They are all pretty much the same. Check the darkslides for cracks, edges for light leaks. Clean them well, blow them out well. Pull the back off, clean the focus screen, don't get the fresnel lens put back in wrong.
Clean the lens carefully, do a time test on the shutter. Keep your eyes peeled for a reasonable 150mm modern lens, but don't get rid of the original lens/shutter setup. Get a good loupe, focus on the groundglass.

Have fun, spend money.

tim in san jose
 
OP
OP

tryals15

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
34
Location
New Orleans
Format
Multi Format
I'm not with the camera right now, but using pictures already up here... It's the 1.5-2" brace that holds the back rail down (on both sides). The little lip that actually does the holding down has been sheared off.
 

Attachments

  • FB-9156-2.jpg
    FB-9156-2.jpg
    634 KB · Views: 76

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,273
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
You mean these bits :D

rail01.jpg


rail02.jpg


I bought two spares from an online seller and repaired mine, there a couple of people in the US who strip down Pacemaker Graphics for sp[are parts which they post on their own webites or Ebay. One was Canyonland Graphics (lakesgraphic on ebay) and the other just has a website but I can't think of his name off-hand.

Luckily I didn't need to many parts to rebuild two totally written off Speed Graphics but they are getting much more expensive now, so good luck :D

Ian
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom