faberryman
Subscriber
Yes, all the photos are of messy car interiors. The photographer stayed on task. Faint praise.I see thematic consistency in the photos.
Yes, all the photos are of messy car interiors. The photographer stayed on task. Faint praise.I see thematic consistency in the photos.
I see thematic consistency in the photos.
Yes, all the photos are of messy car interiors. The photographer stayed on task. Faint praise.
Clear and concise - this is the essence of what the reviewer tried to say.
Thanks.
The reviewer failed to be "clear and concise." He doesn't deserve help. Don't let him graduate. .
Why does anybody believe these photos have anything to do with vets? Do they pity vets? Do they hate vets? Do they even know any vets? Pathetic.
"Jumping to conclusions" apparently means feeling free to comment on the ridiculous, overblown writing and to express doubt about the legitimacy of the work.
Kind of reminds of this Negativland album I heard about on This American Life.
"Compiled by band member Richard Lyons, the book comprises photos of smashed-up cars in a junkyard; next to each crumpled car is reprinted the text of a note or letter or list found in the car."
American Interiors
American Interiors depicts the psychological repercussions of war and military service through images of the interiors of cars owned by veterans in the USA.
...
uh huh, to each their own...
To each his own.
Since jnanian believes the photographer intended the claimed concept, he will surely ask him to post his rebuttal here.
But it doesn't do that and cannot do that. There's no doubt that war and combat messes people's minds up, but the photographer is pretending to be an amateur psychologist and drawing parallels and conclusions that are not valid. He is imposing his own judgements and conclusions in his written statement.
Those cars were likely owned by older white men - it would've been equally invalid to conclude these interiors express the psychological ramifications of being an older white male.
It would've been better to let the photos stand on their own, which is how I initially viewed them.
Kind of reminds of this Negativland album I heard about on This American Life.
"Compiled by band member Richard Lyons, the book comprises photos of smashed-up cars in a junkyard; next to each crumpled car is reprinted the text of a note or letter or list found in the car."
So now messy car interiors arise from PTSD? If only life were so simple.there are plenty of older ( and younger ) white .. and older black (wo)men, and olive skinned men &c who have been ruined by PTSD.
So now messy car interiors arise from PTSD? If only life were so simple.
...
maybe? there are plenty of older ( and younger ) white .. and older black (wo)men, and olive skinned men &c who have been ruined by PTSD....
I agree with you. What I was hoping to demonstrate is that my conclusion, that old white males have messy car interiors, would be just as invalid as saying war vets have messy car interiors.
I liked some of the photos and I'm really not trying to piss on the guy's work -- I just think cause and effect are being overstated.
psychological repercussions of war and military service is in the artist statement no one in this thread is saying anything shameful disrespectful &c about vets.It's shameful to drag this discussion into pious claims about the psychology of war vets.
You are correct. Absolute crap.Seriously? Does anyone think this is good work?
For those who consider the photos dis-respectful, I'd suggest a visit to the photographer's website. Included there amongst the disturbingly chaotic front seats are examples of front seats that are as neat and clean and rigidly pristine as could ever be possible.
you made it a point earlier that people were being disrespectful ( and the project was ) about veterans .. andI don't think the photos are disrespectful (they're just vacuous),
there have been no theories .. just statements that sometimes vets have PTSD. and as seen though the photos that some have "messy" cars ...It's shameful to drag this discussion into pious claims about the psychology of war vets.
Based off the statement from Matthews website, I still say Brad (Articles Author) is jumping to conclusions and pulling to much from his own sentiment rather than what the work actually says. The statement given on the web page to purchase the book does give substantially more information but I don't think it was written by the photographer.or maybe ... it i s part of the reason the person with the camera made the photographs ... and in his statement ?
Post hoc ergo propter hoc. If I hung out at a Walmart parking lot and took pictures of messy car interiors what would you conclude?
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |