didn't he say the negative was the score and the print was the performance? he probably spent 2 days printing it because
1/ photo papers probably weren't 1/2 as good as they are today and
B/ he was trying to figure out how he wanted to print the negative.
a friend's wife is a classically trained pianist and whenever i hear her
play it blows my mind. and i don't really enjoy classical music but i can appreciate how she plays and somehow
is able to do what she does. i can barely play the first part of chopsticks...
Is there any photographer that the "general public" likes, but is roundly disliked by photo enthusiasts - especially internet photo enthusiasts?
For example, go on the Sax on the Web forum and say you like Kenny G. I double-dog dare you.
I don't think the general public knows the name of any photographer, other than perhaps Ansel Adams.Is there any photographer that the "general public" likes, but is roundly disliked by photo enthusiasts - especially internet photo enthusiasts?
i have, and people agree he's one of the finest sax players who has ever lived. you know he invented circular breathing, right?For example, go on the Sax on the Web forum and say you like Kenny G. I double-dog dare you.
no clue why he isn't liked. he's a great photographer and business man and a year or 2 ago he actually soldPeter Lik is the first name that pops into my mind.
I don't think the general public knows the name of any photographer, other than perhaps Ansel Adams.
I am fearful that they know the name of Anne Geddes.I don't think the general public knows the name of any photographer, other than perhaps Ansel Adams.
it is with some humility that I thank all of you who responded to my "question". It seems, in many cases that others have had the same question. I have been looking at "photographs' seriously for many years and continue to do so. There are well known photographer's work that I admire and some by the same photographers that I find uninteresting no matter how long I look at the work. Because of your comments I will continue to use the terms "like" when I see some work and "dislike" when I see others and continue to trust my own opinion. I invite all of you to do the same. You are not "forced" to "like anyone's work because others do or because the photographs bring big dollars, pounds, euros, etc......Again, thank you so much for your comments......Regards!I have been looking at photographs "critically" for 69 years. Over the years I have seen many that I liked and many that I didn't like. Some of those that I did not like were praised by others. I can usually tell whether I like it or not in the first few moments that I see the picture. I am only talking about Black and White and I can usually tell you why I like or don't like it. What is your reaction when viewing a picture for the first time?
It most definitely really matters what you think., especially to you. Anyone who stops what they are doing to listen to a solo-violin piece, as you say, played with feeling and emotion, does most certainly "like" classical music played by an artist and his/her opinions are important......Regards!I know, I put that in there just on spite.
Then it's a performance (in lack of a better word, since I am not a native English-speaker).
I was physically and emotionally stopped in my tracks one time, while doing some test-shots in a church, to prepare for the actual performance.
As I had the auditorium part of the church covered and planned and was heading my way down, a young lady picked up her violin and played a (classical) solo-piece.
I came only half-way down those stairs, because I HAD to stop and listen to her.
I don't "like" classical music generally, but I can like all genres if it is played with feeling and emotion, rather than read-and-play or "for the thousandth time" autopilot.
I know I am stepping on toes by saying Adams and the "pioneer of street-photography" HCB himself, are "Meh", then again, I'm a casual nobody, so it doesn't really matter what I think
Is there any photographer that the "general public" likes, but is roundly disliked by photo enthusiasts - especially internet photo enthusiasts?
For example, go on the Sax on the Web forum and say you like Kenny G. I double-dog dare you.
Over here it would be David Bailey. Like Stirling Moss the racing driver, or Stanley Matthews the footballer, David Bailey became a kind of iconic brand that lives on beyond a professional career. The way Babe Ruth might be for Americans. I seriously doubt the man on the Clapham Omnibus will have heard of any art photographer, including Ansel Adams. A TV programme posted on You Tube recently asked young Londoners to pinpoint major British cities on a map. The results would be laughable if they weren't such an indictment of the current educational system.Maybe on this side of the Pond.... On the other side, I doubt...
Could I add Beaton, Snowden, Litchfield and ,of course, David Hemmings for UK public recognition ?.Over here it would be David Bailey. Like Stirling Moss the racing driver, or Stanley Matthews the footballer, David Bailey became a kind of iconic brand that lives on beyond a professional career. The way Babe Ruth might be for Americans. I seriously doubt the man on the Clapham Omnibus will have heard of any art photographer, including Ansel Adams. A TV programme posted on You Tube recently asked young Londoners to pinpoint major British cities on a map. The results would be laughable if they weren't such an indictment of the current educational system.
Back to the original question, "likes" are not a transferable asset. With the exception of a few who've been commissioned based on their personal online work (Daniel Arnold's work for Vogue comes to mind), a like has no monetary value. You'll earn more working in a camera shop or teaching an evening class than trying to convertinto cash.
Would Jane Bown make it into that group?Could I add Beaton, Snowden, Litchfield and ,of course, David Hemmings for UK public recognition ?.
Not sure, unassuming might not do it, I really like her work but is she show-biz enough to gain public recognition? Years ago I stumbled across a photo by James Ravilious of a Devon farmer protecting himself from a downpour by holding a feed sack over his head.It just spoke to me and his is the work that draws me back again and again. Dan Pavel said it better than I can, it affects me as I immerse myself in his world. His father ,Eric, is better known as an artist.Would Jane Bown make it into that group?
I only know of her work because she was one of the few professional photographers that used an Olympus camera, mostly with an 85mm f/2 as I remember.Would Jane Bown make it into that group?
Consider the fate of William Mortensen. He was far more imaginative (but sometimes controversial) photographer than his arch-enemy Ansel Adams. The grand scenic photos of Adams appealed to more people, so Mortensen lost in their feuds in the photo magazines of their time...
Reading Mary Alinder's take on it, Mortensen actually skillfully won the battle of words, but lost the war...his type of soft-porn went out of fashion.
But you probably didn't read the Observer when she was working.I only know of her work because she was one of the few professional photographers that used an Olympus camera, mostly with an 85mm f/2 as I remember.
Consider the fate of William Mortensen. He was far more imaginative (but sometimes controversial) photographer than his arch-enemy Ansel Adams. The grand scenic photos of Adams appealed to more people, so Mortensen lost in their feuds in the photo magazines of their time. The authority of someone like Adams is necessary for some photographers to decide on what they like. I admire each for their mastery of disparate views.
It depends on which audience you are referring to. To the readers of Camera Craft magazine, Adams and his aesthetic was the victor.It's likely that Ansel Adams' "authority" had little to do with the fate of Mortensen's reputation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?