Altering dev times for contrast...any point?

OP
OP

Robert Canis

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2020
Messages
80
Location
UK
Format
Medium Format

For myself, I use Rodinal 1:50 but the time and agitation I employ for N development enables me to obtain in excess of the usual 5 stops. Indeed, I would say I get closer to 7 resulting in a negative exhibiting good contrast and minimal grain. The scene has to be pushing beyond this for me to do N-1.



shoot HP5 at box speed
 

138S

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2019
Messages
1,776
Location
Pyrenees
Format
Large Format
enables me to obtain in excess of the usual 5 stops. Indeed, I would say I get closer to 7 resulting in a negative exhibiting good contrast and minimal grain.

I depends on film processing, but we can easily get well beyond 7 stops...

Negative film usually offers way more than 5 stops latitude, with POTA developer one may cature up to 20 stops, being 18 quite easy. Another thing is being able to print that dynamic range on paper, or showing it in a monitor. See this color negative film exposure test made under regular development, the girl's face (and hands) has detail at -6 but also at +6, probably at labeled "correct exposure" face was at some +2.5 locally so in the -6 shot the face would be at some -3.5 locally, at +6 image still has good detail so for sure Portra sports more than 12 stops range, before we no pull.

(https://carmencitafilmlab.com/how-exposure-affects-film/)








This is the Kodak Vision 500T graph, contrary to still fim, this stock film datasheet shows latitude in stops:

 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,945
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format


Done correctly, 'Normal' processing should deliver 7 stops of information on the film's straight line at about the right average gradient to print well on grade 2 paper, relative to your enlarger light source etc. Something worth noting about Rodinal and FP4+/ HP5+ is that it tends not to shoulder/ roll off highlight density (likely because of the low solvency not releasing restraining byproducts - iodide etc - from the emulsions), thus meaning that densities beyond those 7 stops will continue to record fairly linearly - this may or may not be useful to you. You may also find that there's a bit less useful shadow speed difference between FP4+ and HP5+ in Rodinal, rather than the 1 2/3 stops the box speeds suggest.
 
Last edited:
  • 138S
  • Deleted

138S

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2019
Messages
1,776
Location
Pyrenees
Format
Large Format
LOL !!! more iodide/bromide in the emulsion ?= more density. "Again it's someone trying to 'prove' that they're cleverer than the emulsion development photoengineers who designed the film to demonstrate he is cleaverer than them."

When one forgets to take the prescribed pills, or when he takes too many pills, then he starts confusing bromide with other things
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,945
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
It's not just about bromide. Iodide, and the placement/ accessibility thereof are seemingly very important to how the sharpness and highlight behaviour of modern films are regulated. These characteristics have been well known in the literature for decades. Rodinal seemingly does not access the surface iodide as well as moderately solvent developers, thus it delivers overall lower sharpness in absolute measurable terms, and apparently less shouldering/ limiting of the maximum density of an emulsion. The larger granularity it tends to deliver may mislead some to believe it's 'sharper', but when enlarged to reasonably large sizes or scanned with equipment capable of delivering high MTF performance, the loss of fine detail compared with more solvent developers like D-76 becomes apparent. PQ Universal, which is also very low solvency, exhibits similar behaviour, delivering a very long straight line and larger granularity. In other words, it's possible by controlling the distribution of the iodide within a set of emulsions to potentially offer significant differences in behaviour between solvent and non-solvent developers. A film with less surface iodide in the slow emulsion(s) would exhibit less difference between solvent and non solvent developers, but may overall deliver less sharpness than one with surface iodide developed in a solvent developer.
 
  • 138S
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Ad Hominem
  • 138S
  • Deleted
OP
OP

Robert Canis

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2020
Messages
80
Location
UK
Format
Medium Format
That is impressive!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…