• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

AgfaPhoto CT Precisa 100 discontinued?


What the heck is 'aviation film'?
 
Actually the market was less in reconnaissance but civil surveying.
Anyway, the change to digital cameras in these markets is why Agfa cancelled a lot of these film the last years.

The firm converting and rebranding these Agfa films as Rollei films is Maco. They do not own the Rollei brand. Nor does the firm manufacturing the classic Rollei cameras...
The demise of german photographic industry brought about some peculiar constellations.
 

So that film market has collapsed too?
 
AgX said:
The real estate was not part of the sale, and Agfa-Gevaert still own that AgfaPhoto brand. However they could not evade that licence agreement with AgfaPhoto Holding and as such that brand got lost for own use.
Click to expand...

Agfa is not in a position to use the "agfa Photo" for any sales, and so it is 100% controlled by AgfaPhoto Holdings. Whoever owns the underlying real estate in the german plant, did remove the factory, it is gone. You yourself in a previous post mentioned that you had observed the buildings disappeared with Amazing speed. probably does not matter if the buildings were on a lease to AgfaPhoto or someone else.
 
But AgfoPhoto as manufacturing entity did not go under because their owner decided the real estate would be more worth than the actual plant. This way I understood your former post.
 
AgX said:
But AgfoPhoto as manufacturing entity did not go under because their owner decided the real estate would be more worth than the actual plant. This way I understood your former post.
Click to expand...

Agfa Photo seemed to be overproducing film, to the point that folks like new adox were complaining that they could not comete, and then all of a sudden the plant closed and was demolished. At the same time we hear of a reorganization. one conclusion would be that there were corporate games to free up the real estate, much like the similar situation at Forte. the equipment business closed also and the chemical business seemed to have changed hands several times. New Adox was able to obtain rights ( not positive it is outright ownership) to the Rodinal trademark.

Short story is that it has been messy, and I personally doubt the outcome was what what agfa had in mind when the spun off the business. Agfa themselves are mostly out of the photo business, and I really wonder if the aviphot that has been floating around in various forms actually was newly made, or was in a Belgian Warehouse, and will dry up.
 
RattyMouse said:
What the heck is 'aviation film'?
Click to expand...

Film designed for aerial photography. It has extended IR sensitivity to help "see" through thin cloud and get better photographs from a plane. Think Google Earth, though I am sure most such users utilise digital photography these days.

Rollei Retro 400S is well known to he Agfa-Gavaert Aviphot 200 - an 200ASA/ISO aviation film. Hence the somewhat high contrast and the well known IR properties of the film. When developed in regular B&W chemistry at shot at 400 it's a nice super-panchromatic film with slightly higher contrast than most. It has the advantage that if you put an IR720 filter on your camera it becomes very cheap and effective IR film.

Judging by the fact that 400S is consistently in stock I'm guessing that either there is an absolutely huge supply or that it's still being manufactured.
 
Agulliver said:
Film designed for aerial photography. It has extended IR sensitivity to help "see" through thin cloud and get better photographs from a plane. Think Google Earth, though I am sure most such users utilise digital photography these days.
Click to expand...

Yes, from my understanding most aviation photography is digital now so it amazes me that Agfa can stay in business selling film to an industry that hardly exists anymore. Digital aviation and satellite photography is so ubiquitous. Why would anyone shoot film in this application? Is there any advantage at all?
 
A recent thread here on Photrio linked to an article about the fact that the U2 reconnaissance plane is still in use and still uses film.
If all the systems that are necessary to both use and support this type of use are still functioning well, it may make much more economic and practical sense to continue using a medium that yields the necessary results than to attempt to develop a digital replacement for it.
I doubt that a newly designed from the ground up (pun intended) reconnaissance plane would today be designed around film. I could be wrong though - I don't have the required specialized knowledge about the pros and cons of each medium with respect to this application.
There is a lot of legacy equipment out there in the world of surveillance video/photography, and a lot of people who find it easier to get the budget for supplies than for capital replacement.
 
RattyMouse said:
Why don't they supply AgfaPhoto?
Click to expand...

Agfa-Gevaert and AgfaPhoto Holding went to court to fight out that brand licensing issue. So they are not on good terms. Also there likely is an exclusivity contract between Agfa and Maco.

Furthermore AgfaPhoto Holding resp. Lupus rather need colour films, but Agfa meanwhile cancelled all of them.
 

I didnt realize that aviation film is all monochrome. Thanks.
 
Agfa had 5 aerial colour films on offer.
 
My local store still has a brick of it. But I think thats the last of it, Ill make sure to grab a few next time I go there.
 

The store in my home town is (was) still well stocked with CT Precisa. In the past I often saw different expiration dates, some pretty close. This time all films where dated 2020/04. I bought six double packs at €12.45 each (€6.23 per roll). Luckily I can store a little Film in a neighbours freezer. Mine is full.

To put that in relation: at Foto Impex a single roll of TX400 135/36 is €6.40. My very first roll in 2015 was €4.90. If you buy ten it will be €6.10 each and only then just below the price of Precisa. E6 film wouldn't need to expensive if people used it a little more.

With the Precisa I already have frozen that is a nice stock of cheap E6 film and I won't have to worry about using it only for the best opportunities. I have been trying to use E6 mostly when traveling to interesting places.

I have a bit of a bad conscious about my relatively austere E6 use and having mostly cheap(ish)ly bought E6 in the freezer. My Velvias were close dated sold at a discount, or bought on holiday in Hong Kong (E6 and Acros is cheaper there, anything else is not). I should and and want to buy more fresh stuff from Fuji. My problem is not using it up quite fast enough to really need to restock, yet.

Even though I have used this opportunity for putting more cheap stuff in the freezer I have made my peace with current prices. If was out of Velvia 50 in 35mm I would simply order another pack of ten. Yes, it is €160. But by the next paycheck it will be forgotten. Any decent restocking of darkroom supplies will easily cost the same.

I have observed that I don't think about the cost of acquisition that much when I'm using film and paper. At least when I have bought a decent amount of a given film or paper. (I bought more than 75 rolls of, then unexpired, Provia400x 120 spread over the year, in 2016, at about €14.50 each). That doesn't mean I'm just going to blast away with it, however.

The psychology of buying a single expensive roll and using it then is a bit different. It hurts more. At least as long as I can spread out purchases of different films I can (at this level at least) cope with E6 pricing.
 
Talking of aviation film, I seem to remember a question on developing Kodak aviation film many years ago. The person had been given some shortly after the May Day celebrations in 1960 - presumably as a present ?

He singed himself Nikita, if I recall correctly. Of course it could have been a nom de plume. Plenty of those on Photrio

pentaxuser
 
Please check if they re-fill the rack. A dozen stores I checked with the exception of one had the rack filled with at least 10 films.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register