I've always used two bath fixing but due to a new house I'm thinking of making my darkroom a little more minimalist and elegant by changing to the Nova Monochrome processor and ecowash setup. This change eliminates a second fixing bath. Is this a terrible idea for fiber paper?
This change is expensive with shipping to the USA so I want to make sure I make a good choice.
Thanks!
Agreed.A single, rapid fix is all you need.
Older Sodium Thiosulphate based fixers were less likely to cause staining due to retained silver thiosulphate complexes in the paper base
Ian
Hi Ian, I have read whatever I could on fixers, have studied English and German literature but have never heard of sodium being less prone to form complexes. Can you elaborate, or share your source?
two-bath fixing has advantages especially for FB papes but it is not a must.You can get an arcival process with a single fixing bath if you exchange the fixing bath sooner and more often. Also it means you have to check the fixing bath for silver content more often.two-bath fixing is just simpler and more robust.I've always used two bath fixing but due to a new house I'm thinking of making my darkroom a little more minimalist and elegant by changing to the Nova Monochrome processor and ecowash setup. This change eliminates a second fixing bath. Is this a terrible idea for fiber paper?
This change is expensive with shipping to the USA so I want to make sure I make a good choice.
Thanks!
There's plenty of literature about this, E.R. Brumpton and G.I.P. Levenson of Kodak Ltd (Harrow Research) published a paper on it. I don't have my copy of L.A. MAson's Photographic Processing Chemistry handy but there may well be a reference the paper i the book (Levenson was the editor and also contributed, Mason was head of research at Ilford).
doubling the time doesn't help but actually hurts.the idea of archival processing is to fix strong and short.long fixing times allow the fixer to get deep into the paper fibers from where it is hard to wash them out .I is better to fix strong and short.that is what two-bath fixing does.If limited to one fixing bath. fix with rapid fixer (strong)for the standard time but exchange the fixer as soon as it has accumulated 1mg of silver/liter .then replace the fixer with a fresh working solution for the next print. under fixing is one of the most common processing errors.I do not see a problem as long as you discard your fix soon enough. When using fresh rapid fixer, a single bath should fix an fb print as well as a double bath would do, the single bath just needs the double amount of time. After a dozen prints, things will look different. I once read that if you want to be on the safe side, you should not fix more than 10-12 prints (8x10) in single bath rapid fixer, while two bath fixing can extend that amount to more than 50.
Yes, 1g1mg? seems very low, perhaps 1g was intended?
Ilford publishes detailed instructions on the mixing, fixing times, keeping times and working capacity of its fixers for both RC and FB papers (which differ significantly) http://www.ilfordphoto.com/products/producttype.asp?n=8&t=Fixers+&+Sundry+Chemicals
Probably the other makers of fixer also publish details. There is no mystery, when instructions are followed (including making a note of paper area fixed) satisfactory fixing is assured.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?