Thank you mooseontheloose. no, actually happens with new (both) paper, just both it. Maybe was from that period of time when they changed the formula (like your link suggest) I know now that not all the photos are suitable for lith, and more grey white areas, the better. It is maybe something to see with this? Or maybe with the dilution, as I can see in Tim Rudman's comment: "lith print much better with higher dilutions" ?
Anyone else has any other idea?
Thanks!
and then you throw it in the selenium...
I know now that not all the photos are suitable for lith, and more grey white areas, the better. It is maybe something to see with this? Or maybe with the dilution, as I can see in Tim Rudman's comment: "lith print much better with higher dilutions" ?
Hi, thanks for te answer. Wanted to say that maybe not all the photos are good to develop in Lith, and that from my experience and for my taste, I discovered that photos with few blacks and big areas of highlights work better. But of course it is about the personal taste, I suppose. In general I like lith prints with more colors, but not a rule. What do you mean by "lith effect with infectious development"? Is not all the lith developers working by infectious developement?I'm not sure what you mean here. Are you looking for more colourful lith prints, or less colourful? Are you looking for the lith effect with infectious development? The two are connected, but not the same.
I worked out this dilution (with loss of color, true) because this way I can stay under 5 minutes od development. And this is because I discovered that this Foma paper that I use starts to have stains after more than 5 minute into the lith developer. But I can see discutions about longer development times, it is maybe that combination that I use Foma paper-Arista developer it is not the best combination to get longer times?Your dilutions seem pretty strong to me. I usually start at 1+19 but can dilute up to 1+30 (or more). The weaker the dilution, the more colourful the print.
To paraphrase Wolfgang Moersch - exposure time and developer dilution are connected. Stronger dilutions mean less exposure time which means less colourful prints. Longer exposure times need weaker dilutions and thus more time in the developer which leads to more colourful prints. Similarly, warmer developer (ex. 30 degrees celsius) will lead to more colour too (and faster exhaustion). Moersch's troubleshooting guide is quite valuable too.
When I first started lith printing I really loved the colours I got from it (especially the Foma papers). But there are many times that I actually want a more muted colour. You can control that too with your ratios of A and B developer. More A will increase colour and contrast but may exhaust faster. More B will result is less colour and contrast but may last longer. For example, I may do 1+20 A and 1+30 B.
I know you are not a subscriber so can't go into the galleries, so here are a few examples:
View attachment 123715
I like this image but it's a little too colourful for me (Foma 132 in warm, very dilute Moersch lith).
View attachment 123716
A little more B to the developer, plus it is an earlier print - at least one of the first three pulled in the session (also Foma 132 in Moersch SE5 lith).
The first two were made a few years ago, before the Foma emulsion change in papers.
That said, here's a recent print (on old Foma paper) that I made a few weeks ago with Moersch developer that has been open for years (amazing keeping qualities!):
View attachment 123717
Probably the same dilutions as the first image, but maybe not as warm.
Also, as others have said, experimenting with toning is something to try too. (I've only just started doing that myself). Or even bleach and redevelopment (make a normal black and white print, maybe slightly overexposed, bleach it back, then develop in lith developer) - even with lithable papers where 1st-pass lith is more time efficient, it's worth experimenting with.
Like M Carter, I find that once I start lith printing, it's very hard to go back to straight up black and white.
Lith - to me - is a very "transformative" process and it can change the mood of an image in big ways; I've slowly gotten to where I'm thinking of that even with the camera in my hand. I haven't done a regular print in over a year now. It can really rephrase what the image is saying, if that makes sense.
But I've done lith with very dark and heavy prints and it's great; it's more about looking at the contact sheet and thinking of how lith would change the image (my avatar is a lith print - it's not a very striking image when printed straight).
Also, variable sepia toning with lith is very useful - between bleaching and working with the more yellow tones, you can really save a print that looks too thick or dull. There's a huge range of possibilities available and then you throw it in the selenium...
Did not tried these yetor copper, gold, or any other toner, Some results can be pretty wild while others are subject to subtle changes.
Where and what type of slavich paper you would recomend for best lith results
Thanks for the answers. Where do you buy slavich paper? Where is the best in europe?
[...]. I even picked up some Azo and Velox, haven't tried the Azo yet but the Velox has possibilities.
M Carter: lately I've been doing what you mentioned earlier in this thread about buying expired paper, it's a real c*(p shoot. I've been focusing mostly on papers that have some chloride combination in the emulsion on the assumption that may make them a little more lith-able. I even picked up some Azo and Velox, haven't tried the Azo yet but the Velox has possibilities. My last session in the darkroom I tried some Afga Brovira that initially wasn't coming up in the developer. I gave it a quick flash with my flashlight and it came out red with some tone reversal like you would expect with solarization, it was really cool. I also tried Portriga Rapid that gave a really nice gold-brown tone. All of my exposures were 1 or two minutes wide open on the lens.
I did experience some significant and rapid bleach-back, 10 -15 seconds in the fix, with the Agfa and Kodak Polyfiber. I was using Arista liquid lith at 1:12. All in all that dilution seemed to provide some reasonable developing time, I experienced some excruciatingly long non-results with dilutions at 1:24, 1:20, & 1:15. I had forgotten about the hot developer Tim Rudman mentions, will try that in the future.
I had dingy highlights on everything and after giving it some though I may have used too much old brown, about 25%. I think I will back off on that in the future as well. I did do the develop and fix only test on unexposed samples and most were not fogged at all.
I like your example in #64 above, and Moose... I really like your first very brown/red example in #55 above. I've pretty much resolved to work at lith printing only for the foreseeable future, not having much inspiration with traditional printing of late.
Thanks for all the great tips. Have you ever tried the 2nd pass lith on a first lith print?
And try copper sulfate bleach - hardest part of that is finding a reasonable quantity of sulfuric acid,
A couple of sources of Sulphuric Acid - Black Swan drain cleaner is 98% acid. Or you could try your local automotive store and see if they have any battery acid (it is usually around 40% sulphuric acid).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?