hchapman
Member
I had been printing Pd and developing in potassium oxalate without using a restrainer with good results.
Have just seen the advantage to adding some Na2. With the Na2 I see perfectly pure paper white in the highlights. The difference is small, on Fabriano Artistico I see LAB L of 96 without the Na2 and 97 with. But given the effort put into the printing I'd like to get out if it all the range possible.
Seems that Arentz, Reeder, and Nelson, who all suggest printing with restrainer, are on to something.
So I'm now re-calibrating my digital negatives to print with Na2 added at the Pd2S level.
Since I'm printing with digital negatives and not using the Na2 for contrast control it seems that the simplest thing would be to add the Na2 to the Pd stock solution. This would save the effort and variability resulting to adding it separately to the sensitizer for each print.
Has anyone experience trying this?
Have just seen the advantage to adding some Na2. With the Na2 I see perfectly pure paper white in the highlights. The difference is small, on Fabriano Artistico I see LAB L of 96 without the Na2 and 97 with. But given the effort put into the printing I'd like to get out if it all the range possible.
Seems that Arentz, Reeder, and Nelson, who all suggest printing with restrainer, are on to something.
So I'm now re-calibrating my digital negatives to print with Na2 added at the Pd2S level.
Since I'm printing with digital negatives and not using the Na2 for contrast control it seems that the simplest thing would be to add the Na2 to the Pd stock solution. This would save the effort and variability resulting to adding it separately to the sensitizer for each print.
Has anyone experience trying this?