PhilBurton
Subscriber
In one of the analog-only forums, I posted a question about developing really, really old Plus-X and Tri-X. This chart got my attention: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threa...-frozen-plus-x-and-tri-x.176021/#post-2292157
Since the other forum is strictly analog, I didn't think it was right to post a question about scanning. But I think this is the right forum. If no one developer is better than all others for both acutance and shadow detail, which factor is more important for scanning purposes. Assume that I will use Adobe Lighthroom (and maybe even Photoshop) to process the resulting TIFFs.
My scanner is a Nikon 5000 ED, with 4.8 dmax.
As always, thanks in advance for all advice. I am very happy to subscribe to this forum to help support it.
Since the other forum is strictly analog, I didn't think it was right to post a question about scanning. But I think this is the right forum. If no one developer is better than all others for both acutance and shadow detail, which factor is more important for scanning purposes. Assume that I will use Adobe Lighthroom (and maybe even Photoshop) to process the resulting TIFFs.
My scanner is a Nikon 5000 ED, with 4.8 dmax.
As always, thanks in advance for all advice. I am very happy to subscribe to this forum to help support it.