Aahh.....! Which Rolleiflex 2.8F to buy?

Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 0
  • 0
  • 1
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 2
  • 0
  • 14
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 2
  • 0
  • 39
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 2
  • 0
  • 36
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 3
  • 2
  • 64

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,826
Messages
2,781,520
Members
99,718
Latest member
nesunoio
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
16
Location
Singaporean
Format
Medium Format
Update:

I got the camera back from Mr. Mickelboro (he was really quick), he did some adjustments for me and serviced the camera, good man.

Unfortunately, the winter is hellish over here now, so I've not been able to go outside to do some real photography with the camera (only test-shots so far).
- Choosing between shooting in -15 degrees celsius with clear skies or -2.5 degrees and heavy now isn't really an option for me, I'll wait for the spring :smile:

Anyway, I made a blog entry about the camera here if anyone is interested:
http://helino-photo.blogspot.no/2013/01/rolling-with-rolleiflex.html

Looking forward to some practical shooting with the camera asap \o/

Hi look forward to your pictures on that camera. Nice blog you have there...
 

rolleiman

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2009
Messages
281
Format
Medium Format
I've always used a Rollei T with 3.5 Tessar lens, I seem to recall reading that with some 2.8 models you actually feed the film leader THROUGH the metal roller, rather than over it as is the case with other Rolleis. Is there a 2.8 user who can confirm or deny this?
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
I've always used a Rollei T with 3.5 Tessar lens, I seem to recall reading that with some 2.8 models you actually feed the film leader THROUGH the metal roller, rather than over it as is the case with other Rolleis. Is there a 2.8 user who can confirm or deny this?

Yes.
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,673
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
I've always used a Rollei T with 3.5 Tessar lens, I seem to recall reading that with some 2.8 models you actually feed the film leader THROUGH the metal roller, rather than over it as is the case with other Rolleis. Is there a 2.8 user who can confirm or deny this?

When they invented the sensor roller you speak of they started calling Rolleis "Automat" The Automats start pretty early in the Rollei line. It isn't only the 2.8s that have the auto feeler roller.
When they started making the 2.8 GX they got rid of the auto feeler. Now in the FX/FT/FW/Fx-N there is no auto feeler, you merely line up the arrow with the red dot just like the T. As far as I am concerned it is good riddance. IMO the auto feeler had almost no value beyond being a selling point. I trust the red dot and arrows in my FX far more than the auto feeler in my F.
Dennis
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,155
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
As far as I am concerned it is good riddance. IMO the auto feeler had almost no value beyond being a selling point. I trust the red dot and arrows in my FX far more than the auto feeler in my F.
Dennis

It's one thing less that can break. But it was a good feature for reporters when every second counted. You can load the Rolleiflex about five seconds faster with the help of the auto-feeler.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom