A very high speed film formula

Mansion

A
Mansion

  • 0
  • 1
  • 18
Lake

A
Lake

  • 3
  • 0
  • 16
One cloud, four windmills

D
One cloud, four windmills

  • 1
  • 0
  • 16
Priorities #2

D
Priorities #2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 16
Priorities

D
Priorities

  • 0
  • 0
  • 14

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,016
Messages
2,784,668
Members
99,774
Latest member
infamouspbj
Recent bookmarks
0

Kirk Keyes

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,234
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
PE - do you have some example patents to recommend looking at for this methodology?
 
OP
OP
Photo Engineer

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
None whatsoever. Sorry.

This, the Kodak kettle design and other arcana are deep dark manufacturing secrets.

PE
 

Kirk Keyes

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,234
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
Could you look at US 3505068 - it looks similar. It uses a "buried iodide emulsion"
 
OP
OP
Photo Engineer

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
The 1970 reference in that patent, and the names of the inventors tell me immediately that it is not a "modern" emulsion, but rather was just at the turning point of many of these techniques. For some reason I could not view the whole patent. I'll check later at the US patent office site.

PE
 

Kirk Keyes

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,234
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
There's another more recent one I think that uses "core shell" techniques. I'll see if I can find it.
 
OP
OP
Photo Engineer

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
I have posted the patent number of several of these. I believe that one author is Ken Reed. Not sure, but he is the author of one patent # I posted here.

PE
 

Kirk Keyes

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,234
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
OK - here's one from Ciba-Geigy in the 70s that looks like it follows much of this process: 4184877.
 
OP
OP
Photo Engineer

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Kirk;

In patent 4184877, the difference is that Ammonium Halides are used, and the Iodide is not ramped down. And so, the result is not a graded core shell, but rather an abrupt core shell. At least I assume that, as the Bromide was added after the Ammonia digest was completed. And, contrary to my example, the core is a mixed Br/I not pure I. This seems to be what they are saying.

I didn't look at the figures, but I assume they are rather thick grains. IDK. It is old. More modern T-grains are thinner I would think and not use ISO washing as is noted in the patent. The emulsion is not very monodisperse at 20% variance, but I'm not sure how they used it and again, I didn't look at the figures.

PE
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom