if you divide what you've spent by the hours of fun you had with it, it's cheaper than bowling.Now that I've sold off about 60% of my camera gear (all 35mm cameras and lenses except one), it's amazing how much money I have sunk into this hobby. Built up over the last 10 years, I had well over $10,000 in hardware! No wonder my wife gets angry from time to time (and is ecstatic these days).
This is not a critical comment towards others (or myself!) as that gear gave me immense pleasure during the past 10 years. You have to spend your money on something, as you can't take it with you.
I still have my medium format gear, and the digitals, which are worth next to nothing since time has passed them by.
if you divide what you've spent by the hours of fun you had with it, it's cheaper than bowling.
The cost of analog photography is all relative... before I discovered photography, I was very close to getting an old British or Italian sports car to work on an enjoy. It was going to be either a chrome bumper MGB or a Fiat Spider (very different choices, but that's another story). Then I inadvertently stumbled into photography, which completely diverted me from the old sports car idea. I've bought way more cameras and lenses than I need, but compared to getting into an old sports car, photography's been dirt cheap. I can shoot film and print to my heart's content, and it feels like I'm getting a lot of joy on a shoestring budget. So it's all relative...
Dale
The balls are solid gold and they only use woolly mammoth tusks for pins, and only the left ones at that.Bowling must be very expensive where you live.
Now that I've sold off about 60% of my camera gear (all 35mm cameras and lenses except one), it's amazing how much money I have sunk into this hobby. Built up over the last 10 years, I had well over $10,000 in hardware! No wonder my wife gets angry from time to time (and is ecstatic these days).
This is not a critical comment towards others (or myself!) as that gear gave me immense pleasure during the past 10 years. You have to spend your money on something, as you can't take it with you.
I still have my medium format gear, and the digitals, which are worth next to nothing since time has passed them by.
Now that I've sold off about 60% of my camera gear (all 35mm cameras and lenses except one), it's amazing how much money I have sunk into this hobby. Built up over the last 10 years, I had well over $10,000 in hardware! No wonder my wife gets angry from time to time (and is ecstatic these days).
This is not a critical comment towards others (or myself!) as that gear gave me immense pleasure during the past 10 years. You have to spend your money on something, as you can't take it with you.
I still have my medium format gear, and the digitals, which are worth next to nothing since time has passed them by.
On the one hand, $10,000 is a lot of money, but over the course of ten years, it starts to look more reasonable. That's $1,000 a year, or about $3 a day.
Go to Starbucks 4 times a week (you and spouse, say, $4.50 ea. x 2 = $9/week) = $468/yr. x 10 yrs = $4680. ROI =$0.00. And you are telling me $10,000 in 10 years is a lot for a substantial hobby?
That's 10 years of bus passes and Starbucks. Going to work is a sinkhole of money too.
if you divide what you've spent by the hours of fun you had with it, it's cheaper than bowling.
With 5 pin, it depends on whether Rye Whisky, is involved5 pin or 10 pin?
Tell me about it. I use 3 tanks of gas, per week. Every other day I gas up.That's 10 years of bus passes and Starbucks. Going to work is a sinkhole of money too.
As far as I can tell. none of you are really spending all that much on your film cameras. Take a look at M3 prices on Ebay. Among others, there's an olive green ex-military camera with kit for $318,520 and "the last M3 ever made", with documents and still unused at $595,000. On the less expensive side, for those on a budget, there's also several M3s priced between $14,1000 and $44,000. I never really loved my M3, with those goggles and silly light meter. Much better was my M4, but I really love my M6 ttl.
You dont have to spend stupid amounts of money to qualify as spending a lot. My film cameras cost in excess of $10,000 all together. I shot 8 binders of negatives in 5 years with that gear. Hundreds of rolls per binder. That's a lot of expense in my book.
I wonder how much film and processing cost relative to the $10k. May double the cost.
As far as I can tell. none of you are really spending all that much on your film cameras. Take a look at M3 prices on Ebay. Among others, there's an olive green ex-military camera with kit for $318,520 and "the last M3 ever made", with documents and still unused at $595,000. On the less expensive side, for those on a budget, there's also several M3s priced between $14,1000 and $44,000. I never really loved my M3, with those goggles and silly light meter. Much better was my M4, but I really love my M6 ttl.
You dont have to spend stupid amounts of money to qualify as spending a lot. My film cameras cost in excess of $10,000 all together. I shot 8 binders of negatives in 5 years with that gear. Hundreds of rolls per binder. That's a lot of expense in my book.
Ratman, I was trying to make a joke. Somehow those prices are rather astonishing.
I had a cousin who would watch me using my old used Leica M3 and M2. He once told me that he wished he could afford a Leica. I answered him that if he would completely give up smoking cigarettes for one year, at the end of that year he could buy, not used equipment like mine but a new Leica and lens and pay cash. Cigarettes won out and he has been dead from emphysema and cardiac problems for years now. Me?, I am still using my old (now older) M3 and M2 cameras. Sure glad some rich person bought them new so I could have the opportunity to wear them out. It seems as if they are outlasting me........Regards!A good friend of mine is an avid photographer. His wife is not, but she was a smoker.
He always liked to have up to date camera equipment, but he never approached the costs to his budget that his wife's smoking habit cost them.
She was diagnosed with cancer of the mouth and had to stop smoking.
Their bottom line improved by over $10,000 a year!
Everything is relative
T
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?