A question about photography

Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 3
  • 0
  • 61
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 9
  • 1
  • 83
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 4
  • 0
  • 60
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 3
  • 0
  • 57

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,837
Messages
2,781,634
Members
99,722
Latest member
Backfocus
Recent bookmarks
0

nc5p

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2005
Messages
398
Location
Alameda
Format
Medium Format
Tell your employer to stay out of Walmart. Also just about every other major chain store out there. They are videotaping everybody from every possible angle the whole time you're in the store. Many cities are now installing cameras on street corners. Albuquerque now has one at Central and 4th, videotape is running 24/7. We just can't seem to get away from being photographed in today's world.

It does seem like a double standard, where the authorities (including huge corporations) have a right to photograph everyone but when one of us (individual without clout) takes a picture in a public place all hell breaks loose.

I don't usually photograph people I don't know. I do photograph spaces and places that belong to somebody else without their permission. I always do it from public property, however. I've got into trouble for it, as many of you know. On another photography site a photographer was in trouble for taking a photograph of a horse from the road. The owner is livid. It was being walked by a neighbor girl, who told the photographer she could take the picture (out on the public road). The photographer gave her name to the girl and soon got a phone call. People are really over-reacting when they even get mad about their animals. The guy who assaulted me just happens to own ten horses, if that makes any difference. (I don't photograph horses as I know this attitude, though I've shot cattle, sheep, and goats without any trouble.) You gotta wonder why they take them to the shows at the fair. There are dozens of people in the bleechers shooting pictures.

As far as the crack about feeling indifferent about photographers being harassed I must take exception to: Are you a studio only photographer? If not then it could happen to you.

Doug
 

Maris

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
1,571
Location
Noosa, Australia
Format
Multi Format
An outcome from a recent State Attorneys General conference in Australia was the principle "no one in public has the right not to be photographed". I believe the decision was formed not for the benefit of photographers but rather to protect local, state, and federal operators of public-space surveillance cameras.

Everything is photographed daily by millions with phone cameras. Celebrities, like everyone else downtown, are on several surveillance screens simultaneously.

Papparazi are pests not because they add few pictures to the massive daily total but because they provoke a reaction through "in your face" tactics.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
don't forget about the surveillance cameras running in every atm.
a little bit of "mr qualls magic microfilm soup" and they can blow a frame up
to be on a billboard :D
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom