A Product Re-Introduction From HARMAN technology Limited

[fotch]

Matte or Matt, always been my choice for a large percentage of my prints.

 

[RattyMouse]

Ilford....showing the industry how it's done. Kickin' ass and takin' names!!

 

[Roger Cole]

Though not a product I will use, it's wonderful to read that there is demand enough to reintroduce this paper.

I'd echo that. I've used Gallerie and it was then and I assume is now a superb paper, but modern VC papers are so good and so convenient I've not printed on graded paper since the early 90s at least. Still I know there are people who will really appreciate it.

IF I were a graded user though and could only have one grade I'd rather have grade 3 than 2. It's easier to get softer results from a soft working developer than to punch up the contrast (though I suppose you could always un-selectively bleach the entire print somewhat, that might work...) At least I'd thinks so but what does a benighted VC printer like me know?

 

[dorff]

Great news, and a show of commitment that will be appreciated and rewarded by your user base.

 

[Axle]

Fantastic! I look forward to giving this a shot!

 

[pmargolis]

Now if you'd only bring back HP5 in 220, we medium-format street photographers would bless Ilford....

 

[Black Dog]

Instant Karma

Now if you'd only bring back HP5 in 220, we medium-format street photographers would bless Ilford....

Yesssss! Please feel free....and instant film would be great too[I can dream]

 

[DREW WILEY]

Is Grade 4 Galerie still made?

 

[TheToadMen]

Yesssss! Please feel free....and instant film would be great too[I can dream]

instant 220 film ..... hmmmm ....

 

[Thomas Bertilsson]

Is Grade 4 Galerie still made?

No. Only 2 and 3.

http://www.ilfordphoto.com/products/product.asp?n=20&t=Photographic+Papers

 

[K-G]

A re-introduction of Galerie grade 4 would be very much appreciated. Besides you wouldn't have to bother about Matt , matt , Mat , Matte or matte. It would just be plain grade 4.
Whatever comes out of the Ilford plant, thank you for your devotion Ilford.

Karl-Gustaf

 

[dorff]

Now if you'd only bring back HP5 in 220, we medium-format street photographers would bless Ilford....

Not only street photographers, mind you. But one has to wonder how many rolls of 220 would sell nowadays. I find it pretty amazing that Ilford manages to keep so many products in the market when other companies drop out like flies.

 

[Roger Cole]

220 might be nice but it's not a big deal to me. I get 12 shots on my Yashicamat and 15 with my M645 Pro. On the latter I can also slap a new back on quickly, or a preloaded insert in the same back. That's good enough.

 

[MartinP]

Isn't 220 film the same thickness as 120, in other words not a super-thin polyester film base like the old motordrive loads? If so, all one would need is a long-ish roll of the correct width included in the annual special-orders process - plus some offcuts of 120 backing paper and some sticky tape.

Currently 46mm and 70mm unperforated is available, so if enough people ask for the standard 120 width (just under 62mm?) then perhaps they will be lucky next year and can buy themselves the ingredients for some home-made 220

 

[Simon R Galley]

61.5mm ( 120 ) film stock is a 'standard' manufactured item and will not be offered on the ULF / Custom manufacture.

Sorry.

Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited

 

[chip j]

I printed some old Galerie matt not long ago-don't like it. What I want is a grade 1 glossy!

 

[Black Dog]

Have you thought of developing a G2 in a very soft working developer, or preflashing it to reduce contrast?

 

[Thomas Bertilsson]

Have you thought of developing a G2 in a very soft working developer, or preflashing it to reduce contrast?

Does Galerie respond to water bath?

Or just learn how to make negs that print well at G2 or 3.

 

[Roger Cole]

Water bath or Freestyle version of Selectol Soft, or more dilute regular developer or pre-flash.

 

[Thomas Bertilsson]

Water bath or Freestyle version of Selectol Soft, or more dilute regular developer or pre-flash.

I can only remember two papers I have used that responded well to water bath. Fotokemika Emaks and Kodak Azo.
I only used one box of Galerie ever, and never tried water bath. Have you tried it? Just curious.

 

[Black Dog]

I normally use Beers' Soft Developer-Selectol Soft or similar would work great too.

 

[DKSEA]

Will this paper work for lith?

Sent from my RM-820_nam_att_100 using Tapatalk

 

[Roger Cole]

I can only remember two papers I have used that responded well to water bath. Fotokemika Emaks and Kodak Azo.
I only used one box of Galerie ever, and never tried water bath. Have you tried it? Just curious.

Nope. Just throwing our some potential ways to lower contrast. I've used Selectol Soft (many years ago) and a bit of pre flashing. There are more ways to lower contrast of a graded paper than to increase it, or so it seems to me.


Sent from my iPhone via Tapatalk using 100% recycled electrons. Because I care.