One says ' circular bokeh' -petzval?
Nothing about the phrase 'circular bokeh' suggests a petzval. More likely they have a lot of aperture blades or they're curved or something, resulting in a near circular aperture.
I'd usually associate creamy/smooth bokeh with normal and good bokeh, I figure Circular was a bad translation perhaps (for spherical)
Already existing industrial lenses in a new dress?
Though within the 80-100mm/large-aperture range choices are few. And probably nothing cheap (in contrast to 50mm).
The prices of 999 Euros($1293 USD) and 849 Euros ($1099 USD) for the 1.4 and 1.8 respectively aint cheap either.That's what I was thinking, Ben.
The prices of 999 Euros($1293 USD) and 849 Euros ($1099 USD) for the 1.4 and 1.8 respectively aint cheap either.
Direct competition AF-S NIKKOR 85mm f/1.4G on bhphotovideo is 1600$, on German Amazon 1449€ (1876$).
Also in consideration is full metal lens over cheap "plastic fantastic" feel of modern nikkors. And those G lenses will not work on many nikon bodies.
Direct competition as I see it is more something like this http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/859124-REG/Samyang_SY85M_C_85mm_f_1_4_Aspherical_Lens.html
Off brand manual focus 85mm f/1.4, $269 or a little over 200
That is a very good price.
I think they want to get more in a "zeiss full metal niche" market. We will see how it will go. Not once more expensive was sold better than cheaper and equally good or better product (Iphone vs android being one example).
Those lens names are suspicious. "Somnium" and "Figmentum"? How certain are we that this isn't some sort of joke that got loose into the wild?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?