A combination to avoid? Illogical film/developer pairings.

OP
OP

waffles

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2017
Messages
175
Location
United States
Format
Medium Format
Also, I should add that I'm going to be shooting medium-format, slow speed, cubic-crystal film in a studio setting with lots of monolights and the ability to develop my film immediately after exposure, on-site (yes, I'm pretty lucky) ^_^
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
Yes! I have the second edition, though ... so some of the recommendations are outdated by a few decades >_>

IDK most of photography in the last 2 decades really hasn't changed much. i was given a copy 25 years ago, most of it seems up to date considering ...
there really haven't been too many films and papers made in the last 2o years that are any different than 25-30 years back ... except for graded paper which is hard to come by and there probably isn't a section on "scanning film" &c. have fun with the book ! btw the troubleshooting section in the back is pretty valuable showing common mistakes in developing &c.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,942
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Yes! I have the second edition, though ... so some of the recommendations are outdated by a few decades >_>
I have his " Beyond Basic Photography" which is copyright 1977 and that makes the content 42 years old now. What is the date of the second edition of Basic Photography? Is this later? I can think of a few things that have changed on the "film and darkroom world" but it would be interesting to know what in his Basic Photography book is outdated. I ask because outdated books are really all that are available now and when considering such books it is nice to know what they either don't contain in terms of relevance or and more importantly what may now be unintentionally misleading.

Thanks

pentaxuser
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…