• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

A 35mm compact cameras that focus closer than 1m

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,969
Messages
2,848,245
Members
101,564
Latest member
noelchenier
Recent bookmarks
1

Mewael

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 25, 2013
Messages
30
Format
35mm RF
I recently bought a Contax T and I love the thing, however, I have one complaint: the minimum focus distance is 1m. This isn't a deal breaker, as I still love the camera, but I'd really love to shoot at 0.7m.

I would like a camera that is compact, semi-wide (38mm-45mm), sports a good viewfinder, is manual focus (rangefinder), and has a 0.7m MFD.

The T is all of the above, but with a 1m MFD limitation.
The T2 has a MFD of 0.7m, but is auto focus.
The T3 is more costly than the T2 and doesn't provide me with any practical advantage over the T/T2, so I'm not considering this camera.

I have the Kodak Retina IIIc and Rollei 35 too. Great cameras, but they aren't what I'm looking for.

I'm most likely going to try a T2 next, but I'm wondering if there is any other camera that I should look into.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Was going to mention an Olympus RC but I checked mine and yep, close focus is 3 feet, no help there.
 
mount

It appears there is to way to mount filters on the front of the camera.
 
Canonet G-III QL17 rangefinder-focuses down to a marked 2.6 feet / 0.8 meter.
 
Always wanted an XA-4 Olympus for this very reason. Close-focus macro compact.............JW
 
Hexar AF = 0.6m

... sorta kinda manual focus
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Olympus Mju ii Stylus epic focusses down to 35cm or 1.2 ft.

This is a great little camera and it really is little and the OP is unlikely to find one that focuses closer. Pity it fails to meet the manual focus rangefinder requirement. It's biggest drawback for me is that filters for B&W work cannot be fitted to it.

pentaxuser
 
This is a great little camera and it really is little and the OP is unlikely to find one that focuses closer. Pity it fails to meet the manual focus rangefinder requirement. It's biggest drawback for me is that filters for B&W work cannot be fitted to it.

pentaxuser

It doesn't have to be manual focus, what I listed are my preferences.

What I listed are my preferences.
 
Hexar AF = 0.6m

... sorta kinda manual focus

Macro refers to scale of reproduction. Just employing a facility to focus at closer distance whilst substituting the lens for a wider angle may not lead to larger scale. In this case the gain is minimal:


(simplified calculation)

0.13 @50mm/50cm (35mm SLR)

0.05 @40mm/90cm (Rollei 35)

0.15 @35mm/30cm (XA-4 and µ-II)

0.07 @35mm/60cm (Hexar AF)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, I'll unpack a little ...

Hexar against OP's preferences:

compact - not tiny, but compact enough

semi-wide (38mm-45mm) - ok so 35mm is 3mm out of bounds

sports a good viewfinder - not the best, but pretty nice

manual focus (rangefinder) - you can focus it manually, but I'm not sure you'd want to

0.7m MFD - 0.6m, or equivalent to 0.69m for a 40mm
 
Nikon L35AF3, third camera in the L35AF series. Focus to .45m, and the option to use lens filters. 35mm f2.8 lens.
 
I'll second to recommendation for the XA4, used one before great little cameras.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom