90mm lens recs? (for 4x5)

Jekyll driftwood

H
Jekyll driftwood

  • 1
  • 0
  • 27
It's also a verb.

D
It's also a verb.

  • 3
  • 0
  • 32
The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 12
  • 4
  • 119
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 82

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,916
Messages
2,783,076
Members
99,745
Latest member
Javier Tello
Recent bookmarks
0

thomas_m

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
55
Location
Bellevue, WA
Format
Medium Format
I've been having so much fun with the 4x5" SLR and old barrel lenses I bought from Jim G, I broke down and bought a view camera. My MF gear will likely be headed to Ebay soon...

With 6x7cm MF, my favorite focal length is 65mm so I thought I'd start with a 90mm as a first 4x5" lens for the view camera. I'd like to avoid breaking the bank. I'm more concerned about image quality and brightness for focusing in dim conditions than I am about extensive coverage for movements.

If it helps, I hope to follow this lens with a 60mm-ish and 120/150mm-ish later this year when the wallet recovers.

I'll be shooting almost exclusively B&W, Efke 25, Fomapan 100 & Tmax 400.

Thanks in advance,

Thomas
 

Early Riser

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,681
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
You can't go wrong with a 90mm 6.8 grandagon. There's a zillion of them on ebay, they're not too large and they're quite a bit brighter than the f8 90mm's out there. The f4.5 90mm Grandagon is much brighter and easier to focus but it's a big lens.
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2004
Messages
726
Location
Wilmette,Ill
Format
Multi Format
I use a 90mm f/8 Super Angulon on 4x5 and like it a lot. I also had a 100mm Wide Field Ektar that was very good. Either of these or a Grandagon would be hard to go wrong with. You might also try a 90mm Angulon. If you do, try for a late one as Schneider's quality control improved over time. I use one of the last ones they made on an 8x10 Hobo and it's a terrific lens.

Richard Wasserman
 

bobfowler

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
1,441
Location
New Jersey,
Format
Multi Format
I had a 90mm f/8 SA, but sold it after I bought my 90mm f/8 Ilex-Calumet Wide Field Caltar. I found the WF Caltar was better than the SA (but this could be just a sample variation).
 

roteague

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
6,641
Location
Kaneohe, Haw
Format
4x5 Format
My suggestion would be the Schneider Super-Symmar XL 80mm F4.5 - it is a stuningly sharp lens. It is small, light, and it is very easy to view the image on the ground glass.
 

rbarker

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
2,218
Location
Rio Rancho,
Format
Multi Format
Originally, I had the "classic" 90mm f/8 Super Angulon, but had trouble focusing it in anything but strong sunlight due to the aperture. I went to the later 5.6 version Super Angulon XL, and was happier. They are, however, rather large and bulky for that focal length.

Then, along came the Super Symmar XL. I bought the 110mm length early on, and have only used my 90mm a couple of times since. The design is far more compact, has lots of coverage, and it's very sharp. The Super Symmars are, however, a bit pricey by comparison, but well worth the extra expense, I think. I haven't tried the 80mm SS XL, but it looks tempting.
 

photobum

Member
Joined
May 18, 2003
Messages
418
Location
Northern Vir
Format
Large Format
I use a 6.8 Optar for carrying on my back and a 6.8 Grandagon for carrying in my van. A 90mm or wider anything and brightness is a oxymoron. A 60-ish is really dark. You learn to live with it. Or not.
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,236
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format
Thomas, I have a 90mm f6.8 Caltar which is the Rodenstock Grandagon rebranded for Calumet. It's mint for all practical purposes. $385. Pics if interested.
 

roteague

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
6,641
Location
Kaneohe, Haw
Format
4x5 Format
rbarker said:
Then, along came the Super Symmar XL. I bought the 110mm length early on, and have only used my 90mm a couple of times since. The design is far more compact, has lots of coverage, and it's very sharp. The Super Symmars are, however, a bit pricey by comparison, but well worth the extra expense, I think. I haven't tried the 80mm SS XL, but it looks tempting.

It is a great lens, but now I want the 110mm.

I should point out for others, you may need to use a center filter with the 80mm - I use one all the time, since I shoot primarily transparencies. The filter is a bit pricey as well.
 
Joined
May 1, 2005
Messages
218
Location
downwind fro
Format
Multi Format
I've had several excellent 90/6.8 Grandagons ($400~$500) over the years but last year I tried a 90/4.5 (~$800), which is a big hunk of glass. But the photos were so smooth and even, the ground glass was so bright, and I could use large movements - in other words, you get what you pay for and it is worth the weight. The other lens to check out is the Schneider 110XL but I liked the wider 90 myself - and it is less expensive than the 110XL ($1200).
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom