As far as I know all Mamiya 645's have electronically controlled shutters and therefore require a battery to operate.
A Hasselblad 500 series with A16 back.
I think the mamiyas are electronically controlled shutters so won't meet your standards. Perhaps surprisingly, there isn't really anything that does exactly what you want. I think your best bet is a Hasselblad with the 16 back. Yes, it's heavier than it would have to be if it were natively 645, but it's in the same ballpark of about 1.5kg.
I thought about recommending the Bronica, it's a nice choice also, and a good budget pick, nice lenses, good price, light and compact. You could probably get what you want for $375 if you budget $100 for the body, $75 for the 645 back (uncommon), $100 for the standard lens and $50 for the prism. Alternatively, you could get a Hasselblad for $200 for the body, $250 for the standard lens and $100 for the back and $25 for the prism (all available at that price right now at adorama, except the back...) All in it's a $200 difference, which I think is worth it to get something that's top of the line, has a great reliability track record, is very repairable (both from people who repair it and availability of parts).
But yeah, the Bronica would also be a good choice.
Btw, aren't there vertical format 645 backs for Hasselblad? Maybe for Bronica as well? IIRC then the orientation isn't a problem if you're not opposed to changing backs.
and a Daiichi Zenobia
and a 645 back for my RB67 -- but the RB is heavy and the lenses I have are long for the format (and the wider lenses are more expensive than the ones from 90mm up), plus the available lenses are comparatively slow -- I'd like to get to f/3.5 or f/2.8, if not faster.
What options are there for a 645 "system" SLR that's light enough to carry around, doesn't require a battery to give all shutter speeds and apertures, and doesn't cost an arm and a leg
Yes, ARAX bought up the remaining inventory of parts for the Kiev 60/88 line of cameras from Ukraine and build/rebuild/repair/modify those cameras along with making new lens adapters and such. I keep meaning to send 3 of my Kiev 88 bodies to them to CLA and repair, but the shipping always is a hurdle...Hmm. Arax. Never heard of it, but they're apparently selling them new for about $300. Uses a Pentacon/Praktica 6 mount, so inexpensive Russian/FSU lenses. Must investigate the Arax!
Yes, ARAX bought up the remaining inventory of parts for the Kiev 60/88 line of cameras from Ukraine and build/rebuild/repair/modify those cameras along with making new lens adapters and such. I keep meaning to send 3 of my Kiev 88 bodies to them to CLA and repair, but the shipping always is a hurdle...
https://araxfoto.com/
Right. I have one which needs a thorough CLA. If 127 film were more available and less expensive I'd have that done; the Komaflex S is a nice shooter with a good lens.Komaflex, another way of spelling "Are you sure you want this?"
[edit, mental slip] I finally woke up and remembered that the Komaflex shoots 40x40 on 127 film. Not what the OP wants. Sorry.
A lot of the original Mamiya 645s are 50 years old but still chugging along.So instead, I should get an electronic Mamiya 645 for which there are no longer electronic spares, and hope I get good service out of it before the electronics fail?
So instead, I should get an electronic Mamiya 645 for which there are no longer electronic spares, and hope I get good service out of it before the electronics fail?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?