I've never even heard of 6.5x9 unless that's a metric version of 2.25x3.25? I'd think that would be 6x9 though. That IS available, and readily:
http://www.freestylephoto.biz/category/2-Film/Black-and-White-Film?attr[]=1-50
I have a 3x4 speed, and a 9x12 folder.. film is no longer available for them, so I cut my own.
Rather than go into the process.. search the web.. here are two quick ones I came up with..
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
http://photo.net/large-format-photography-forum/00Nxmt?start=10
It was a standard plate size, many cameras will take a 6x9 Rollex or Rada 120 back, there were also 620 backs.
I've never even heard of 6.5x9 unless that's a metric version of 2.25x3.25? I'd think that would be 6x9 though. That IS available, and readily:
http://www.freestylephoto.biz/category/2-Film/Black-and-White-Film?attr[]=1-50
Nope, I definitely do mean 6.5x9. The camera is a Voigtlander Avus 6.5x9 format.
I just noticed one of the film holders has been modified to take 6cm wide strips (perhaps would fit cut down 120 film, or 6x9 sheets). So that's a nice bonus.
The 6x9 rollfilm backs for this format cost more than the camera, the rare times they come up.
No the roll film backs are remarkably cheap and common, I've never paid more than £10/$14 and usually a bit less.
Ian
On ebay? I'll have to keep an eye out, would love to find one (the couple times I've seen them sellers have been asking upwards of $150).
Hasselblad used to sell a trimming scissors to cut 6.5 x 9 cm into a square for their sheet film holders for the Hasselblad 500 series cameras.
http://photo-otaku.com/hasselblad-scissors/
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?