50mm vs 65mm on Mamiya RB67

Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 1
  • 1
  • 16
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 21
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 5
  • 154
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 161
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 2
  • 2
  • 153

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,814
Messages
2,781,199
Members
99,710
Latest member
LibbyPScott
Recent bookmarks
0

kwall

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Messages
64
Location
San Jose, Ca
Format
35mm
Hi all,

If anyone has used both the 50mm and 65mm Mamiya-Sekors, I'm interested in a comparison. Other than the focal length, which is obviously a consideration, are there significant differences between the two? The 50mm 4.5c has a good reputation and I'm leaning that way, but I'd like to more opinions. I'm sure there are a lot of those here. :wink:

Thanks!

Kurt
 

epatsellis

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
928
Format
Multi Format
I have and use both, frequently. The 50 feels really wide, wider than the lens equivalency charts would have you think. For general use, the 65 is quite wide.
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
Get the 65 and the 6x8 back. I am not a fan of the rb 50s (compared with the amazing 50 uld on the rz,at least) but it might work well for you, especially for b&w work.

The 65 is excellent and is also rather inexpensive for what it delivers.
 

epatsellis

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
928
Format
Multi Format
I will admit, my references are somewhat skewed, as I now primarily shoot 7x7 with the RB and the Dicomed Scan Back, haven't actually put a roll of film in a back in quite some time. And before you ask Keith, yes I still have a pile of 120 and 220 backs.
 

Maris

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
1,571
Location
Noosa, Australia
Format
Multi Format
I tried both and went for the 50mm. The image quality is so good I can always crop a 65mm view out of the 50mm but not the other way around,
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,918
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The 65 is more likely to be used as a standard lens by me - I use a 35mm lens as a standard lens on 35mm film.

I've had my 50mm lens longer than I've had my 65mm lens, and I really like it.
 

David Brown

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
4,049
Location
Earth
Format
Multi Format
The 50mm is roughly 28mm equivalent in a 35mm camera. The 65mm equals about 35mm equivalent.

I have and use both. Like so many other "what (fill in the blank) should I use" questions, it's really up to you. I use these two, and a 90 and a 180 depending on what I need to frame the picture at hand. YMMV.
 
OP
OP

kwall

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Messages
64
Location
San Jose, Ca
Format
35mm
I have and use both. Like so many other "what (fill in the blank) should I use" questions, it's really up to you. I use these two, and a 90 and a 180 depending on what I need to frame the picture at hand. YMMV.

Indeed, David. Thanks for reminding me. I understand I ultimately make the decision based on my own needs and interests, but I can still profit from others' experiences and input. As an MF noob and an eager film convert, I'd be imprudent not to take advantage of the wisdom and experience here.

Kurt
 
OP
OP

kwall

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Messages
64
Location
San Jose, Ca
Format
35mm
Thanks everyone! This was the input (and examples) for which I was hoping. At least at KEH, an LN- or better 65mm and is slightly less expensive than an EX+ 50mm, so I think I'm going to go with the 65mm. Thanks again!

Kurt
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom