4x5 enlarging lens

Its about the light

D
Its about the light

  • 4
  • 0
  • 43
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 8
  • 0
  • 91

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,036
Messages
2,817,994
Members
100,487
Latest member
Luis Costa
Recent bookmarks
0

fiddle

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
374
Location
NYC
Format
Multi Format
Hello all,
quick question, Im new to 4x5 in the darkroom, been shooting it for a little bit. Im finally in the final stages of my new darkroom build, moved up from a beseler 23c to a 45.
I need to get a lens for 4x5, will a 135 allow me to make smallish 8x10 prints? Im assuming a 150 would be better for that because of the head height?
I like to make small prints, and dont see myself ever going beyond 16x20, if that.

Any lenses I should avoid looking for?

Thank you!
 

awty

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 24, 2016
Messages
3,698
Location
Australia
Format
Multi Format
You need all the lenses.
150mm is a normal lens for 4x5 printing, but I often use a 130 to do 8x10s it's not that big a difference.
Most lenses in good condition do a decent job. It's only when you are doing big prints with small film that the difference becomes more apparent.
 

Huub

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
250
Format
4x5 Format
Depends a bit on the type of 135mm, but i use a 135mm rodagon on my D2V all the time for 4x5. The advantage of a 135mm is that you need less hight for making the same size of prints. No issues at all when printing 'smallish' 8x10 prints, but it also works for 20x24 if you ever feel the need.
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
10,002
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
I have two 4x5 enlargers, one with a Rodagon 150 that is spectacular, the other has an ancient Solar (Wollensak) 135 that performs very well. You would be hard pressed to see the difference without an optical aid. Where the difference is seen, is in the light source. The Rodagon is mounted on a Beseler with a diffused cold light head and the Solar on an Omega Pro Lab with condenser head.
 
OP
OP

fiddle

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
374
Location
NYC
Format
Multi Format
Thank you all!.
At least I know now that either will work. Time to go on a search. :D
 

MattiS

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 29, 2016
Messages
218
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Another advantage of the 135 over the 150 (M50) is the M39 thread. So you might already own the right lensboard. M50 lensboards are not that common.
 
OP
OP

fiddle

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
374
Location
NYC
Format
Multi Format
I do have m39 boards from my beseler 23, although the new enlarger came with what I measured with a really crappy caliper to be a 42. From my research it looks like the componon s lenses are 42. I think.. lol

Not sure if it's a factory lensboard, it's 2 boards, foam in the middle with 3 threads to adjust. Easier to align than shimming the board I guess.
 
OP
OP

fiddle

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
374
Location
NYC
Format
Multi Format
I really.do hate hate ebay. Time to put a wtb add here.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
10,004
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Wollensak made a 135, 4 elements in 3 groups, then a 162 in both a 4 element in 3 groups and a 6 element in 4 groups, the 135 is not a good performer with 4X5, the 162 was designed for 4X5. The 6 element pro version is sharp up to 20X24. Kodak made a 161, a 4 element in 3 groups. In the 70s I had this lens, still do somewhere in a box, it was fine up to 11X16, soft at 20X24
 

Patrick Robert James

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
3,402
Format
35mm RF
I've got an extra Computar DL 135mm laying around. I bought every Computar DL I could find for a while. In the spec sheet they describe the design as such- "liberal use of high index low dispersion glass" which would be labeled APO by any other manufacturer.
 

John Koehrer

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
I do have m39 boards from my beseler 23, although the new enlarger came with what I measured with a really crappy caliper to be a 42. From my research it looks like the componon s lenses are 42. I think.. lol

Not sure if it's a factory lensboard, it's 2 boards, foam in the middle with 3 threads to adjust. Easier to align than shimming the board I guess.

Yup! Sure & that's what tis made for. Dunno if it's original or not but...................
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,640
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
I really love my older El-Nikkor 150mm lens and use it for most of my enlargements, but I have the El-Nikkor 135mm that I use for making larger prints (crops from 4x5 negatives in 16x20 and 20x24) that works wonderfully too. Either focal length will do a great job if you get a quality lens. If you only want to spring for one, and if you plan on doing larger prints, go for the 135mm.

Best,

Doremus
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,604
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
150mm vs 135mm only makes a 10% shorter enlarger head height for same size print with shorter FL lens
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,607
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I really love my older El-Nikkor 150mm lens and use it for most of my enlargements, but I have the El-Nikkor 135mm that I use for making larger prints (crops from 4x5 negatives in 16x20 and 20x24) that works wonderfully too. Either focal length will do a great job if you get a quality lens. If you only want to spring for one, and if you plan on doing larger prints, go for the 135mm.

Best,

Doremus
I love these older El Nikkor lenses, so beautifully made.
 

Christiaan Phleger

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,217
Location
Hawaii
Format
35mm RF
I too am very fond of the EL NIkkors, the seemingly lower quality of the plastic "N" versions is offset by the simplicity of construction so that they can be easily cleaned. All my nikkor enlarging lenses have faired much better than the Schneiders or the Rodenstocks I have. I've been tempted to return a 50mm APO Rodenstock and claim the original warranty on a defective product since that one has haze inside a sealed lens group.
 

Mal Paso

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
382
Location
Carmel, Ca USA
Format
4x5 Format
It would take a scientist to tell in real life but If I remember right, recent 135mm lenses from the big 3 are corrected to 12X and the 150mm to 8-10X. I don't remember there being minimums. I have it written down here ... someplace.

El Nikkor 150mm 2-8X
El Nikkor 135mm 2-10X Says "usable range" but I have done 1:1
 
Last edited:

JensH

Member
Joined
May 30, 2017
Messages
531
Location
Schaumburg, Germany
Format
Multi Format
It would take a scientist to tell in real life but If I remember right, recent 135mm lenses from the big 3 are corrected to 12X and the 150mm to 8-10X. I don't remember there being minimums. I have it written down here ... someplace.

El Nikkor 150mm 2-8X
El Nikkor 135mm 2-10X Says "usable range" but I have done 1:1

... as the Rodenstock data are at hand, here the optimum magnifications are:

Rodagon 135mm: 6x (2x - 10x)
Rodagon 150mm: 6x (2x - 10x)
Apo-Rodagon-N 150mm: 6x (2x - 15x)
Apo-Rodagon 180mm: 6x (3x - 10x)
Rodagon 180mm: 5x (2x - 8x)
Rodagon 210mm: 4x (2x - 8x)

On my enlarger (Durst 138s with two 240mm condenser lenses) 135 and 150mm don't give even illumination,
a larger bulb size and different condenser would help... but I like the 180mm better anyway.
I would start with a six element 150mm by a brand you like.
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom