35mm: Qualities of favorite glass for Kodak Tri-X

Sydney Harbour

A
Sydney Harbour

  • 2
  • 0
  • 33
Sonatas XII-90 (Farms)

A
Sonatas XII-90 (Farms)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 37
Barn and Silo

H
Barn and Silo

  • 3
  • 0
  • 63
Awaiting light

D
Awaiting light

  • 3
  • 0
  • 48
Dusk in the Rockies

A
Dusk in the Rockies

  • 4
  • 0
  • 121

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,351
Messages
2,806,617
Members
100,223
Latest member
fdeltd
Recent bookmarks
0

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,912
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
The wisdom in this forum is incredible. I'm still digesting the insights shared here.



I don't know if sharpness is all that important, especially knowing what it can reveal on human skin. Some of the best (or most historically recognized) photographs ever made were not sharp. But I am open-minded about it.

Well that's an issue, if you want M42 or Nikon F lens, Pentax, Fuji, Zeiss, Leica, Contex and Nikon were all sharp lens, as 35mm was such a small negative compared to 8 X10 which was still a common format for commercial work when the Nikon F was released in 1959. There were a few soft focus lens made in 35mm for a soft look for portiurates, not sure if Nikon made one or not. Off beat idea, Arugs C3, with 100mm Cintar 3 element lens shot wide open.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom