35mm Color Neg Film Selection

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 20
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 44
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 45
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 36
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 42

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,901
Messages
2,782,753
Members
99,741
Latest member
likes_life
Recent bookmarks
2

Bruce Osgood

Membership Council
Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
2,642
Location
Brooklyn, N.Y.
Format
Multi Format
I've been asked to shoot a Halloween Parade and outdoor party of DOGS! (What we won't do for love).

Anyway, the film will be processed in a 1-hour lab and the prints used for promotion purposes after scanning. I am only asked to take the pictures.

Question is: What film to use? Outdoors, Bright Colors, much animation (Pi--ed off dogs forced into "cute" costumes), questionable lighting though I do have TTL flash support.

The sponsors of the event are looking for sharp, grainless & saturated images, not what they are used to with their digicams. They feel an event of this magnitude deserves film. Unfortunately I very seldom shoot color.

Any and all suggestions will be appreciated.
 

jcausey

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
47
Location
Bloomington,
Format
Multi Format
If you're not looking for totally natural skin tones, look at the 100UC film from Kodak. Deep color saturation with bright, almost lurid colors.

I believe I've also heard that Konica Minolta has a color negative film with crazy-cool color saturation.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,245
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
Much as I dislike Kodak, I dislike the garish Velia colours even more. So for me this is simple: Portra somethingorother VC - I'm taking 3 rolls of Portra 400VC with me to the rig this time, for use in the Bessa R.
 

Brac

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
632
Location
UK
Format
35mm
jcausey said:
If you're not looking for totally natural skin tones, look at the 100UC film from Kodak. Deep color saturation with bright, almost lurid colors.

I believe I've also heard that Konica Minolta has a color negative film with crazy-cool color saturation.

I'm not 100% sure but this may be Konica Impressa 50 which seems about to be discontinued and is rather slow. However if you can get it the newish Agfacolor Ultra 100 claims to have really vibrant colours. Alternatively Kodak Royal Supra (may be called something different in US) seems to be well thought of but that is about to be replaced by something called Elite Colour! Never used any of them I quite like bog standard Kodak Gold, Agfacolor Vista & Konica Superia Super!
 

noblebeast

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2003
Messages
559
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Medium Format
I would cast my vote for Kodak Portra UC - even the 400 version is very fine grained. I shot the Fall colors in Vermont with it (35mm) and have been very pleased with the enlargements from it, though none went past 11X14. But if they are scanning them I assume the prints would just be the standard 4X6, or are they scanning the negs/chromes directly? If chromes can be used, Kodak has some "enhanced saturation" film that would show off the colors of the costumes well.

Whatever you go with, I would also suggest a polarizing filter, which will make those colorful costumes really "pop." And the fill flash you mentioned will undoubtedly be a good idea, especially if it is a sunny day, or a cloudy day, or in the shade....(you get the idea) And since it is four-legged children, if I were saddled with the project I would go with the 400asa film. Sounds like a fun day!

Joe
 

Ed Sukach

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
4,517
Location
Ipswich, Mas
Format
Medium Format
I'd use AgfaColor 200. Why? For no other reason than I always use Agfacolor - and I understand it.

Going to be developed in a "One-Hour Lab".
Well, the choice of film will be the least of your problems ...
 

jcausey

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
47
Location
Bloomington,
Format
Multi Format
Actually, one of the nice things about the Kodak UC line is that one-hour labs can handle the job rather nicely. As long as you select one that's not run by troglodytes, your negs will be fine and your prints might even be halfway-okay... and you can get really great reprints done by a pro lab.
 

jd callow

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 31, 2003
Messages
8,466
Location
Milan
Format
Multi Format
My first choice would be 400UC (rated no higher than 320 preferably @200) followed by Reala (rated at 50-64).

It may seem odd to some to over expose 2/3 to a full stop, but these two films will have no issue with the 'over exposure' and the resulting neg will have less grain and greater saturation. To me the reality is that most film neg film is about one half to a full stop slower than labeled.
 

Tom Duffy

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
969
Location
New Jersey
Bruce,
another vote for Kodak Ultra Color 400. It and Portra 400 UC before it are my standard color film. I too, rate it at 200. Shadow detail is excellent. It's the perfect combination of moderately high saturation, low contrast and excellent skin tones.
Take care,
Tom
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom