160NS vs 400H

Stevie

A
Stevie

  • 2
  • 0
  • 38
No Show

A
No Show

  • 1
  • 0
  • 43
Hydrant Omega

A
Hydrant Omega

  • 1
  • 0
  • 35
Feral Cereal

A
Feral Cereal

  • 0
  • 0
  • 37

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
177,205
Messages
2,430,518
Members
94,147
Latest member
Luigi Galasso
Recent bookmarks
3

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,046
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Shooter
Multi Format
160NS is considerably cheaper where I buy film, at least while stock still hangs on. I have only limited experience with this film. Is the color and contrast very similar to 400H? I really like 400H so buying up stock of 160NS might be a cheaper way to get what I like out of color film, assuming the light is strong to make up for the slower speed.
 

MDR

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
1,401
Location
Austria
Shooter
Multi Format
I used to use Fuji 160NS quiet a lot in fact it is one of my favourite color films. The 160NS is Fuji's Portra 160 equivalent not too saturated and quite beautiful for portraits as well as Landscapes. In terms of color fidelity the 400H and 160NS should be close but not identical. If you don't have enough light get a tripod.
 

TheToadMen

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
3,560
Location
Netherlands, EU
Shooter
Pinhole

wombat2go

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
352
Location
Michigan
Shooter
Medium Format
I am just getting ready to develop a batch so here is a photo of them
 

Attachments

  • FujiFilm.jpg
    FujiFilm.jpg
    347.3 KB · Views: 118
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford Photo ADOX Freestyle Photographic Photo Warehouse Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab
Top Bottom