120mm film

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,082
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format

Again, NASA calls it infrared light -- but then the site I pulled this from is for kids. Insects do not "see" into the infrared part of the spectrum (as far I know), but UV light. It is snakes that can "image" infrared light (heat) stereoscopically.

http://science.hq.nasa.gov/kids/imagers/ems/infrared.html
 

wotalegend

Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
360
Location
Melbourne (t
Format
Multi Format
One of my pet peeves on photographic fora is Leica snobs who insist on referring to various official Leica accessories by the cryptic alphabetic product names which Leitz gave them, so that those of us who are less informed have no idea what they are talking about. e.g. IROOA (a lens hood), SHOOC, SBOOI, and SGVOO (apparently all are viewfinders).
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
Sorry, folks, for using the term Hassy. It's just a "cute" nickname; not a "hipster" or "beginner" thing, in my case.

Some of my least favorites are:

- 120mm film - It is not 120mm wide
- mixing up of the terms f stop and aperture ("Which aperture do I use?") - one is a physical measurement of the hole made by the diaphragm, and one is a setting that is used on the camera/lens. One will almost never need to know or refer to the "aperture" in terms of it's actual size (macro shooters, maybe).
- "Infrared film is exposed by heat." - One of the teachers I assist says this every G.D. time she teaches the IR portion of the experimental class, and it grates on me like hell, because it is passing absolutely horrible information on to students. But even though I have known her for years, I have not yet figured out a way to politely shatter her lifelong belief.....
- treating green box mode as if it is "program" mode (on a modern camera, of course) - it is not, and you will get totally different results if shooting digital (i.e. no ISO control, no AF control, and no ability to shoot RAW)...and why are you using either of these modes anyhow?
- printing on the back side of a speed easel (so common it makes me sick)
- putting the lens in the enlarger backwards, so you cannot see the f numbers
- buying pre-cut 8x10 mats and expecting your print on 8x10 paper to fit ("Why is there a gap?" or "How do I tape it?)
- "Photography is an art" - No, it isn't. It is a tool/method that has many purposes, one of which is art. Art is art if it is art, not just because it is a photograph (i.e. the technique in and of itself). I realize that this is often supposed to be complimentary, or at least show some sort of pseudo interest/understanding in a conversation, but it really grates. I find it to be a very shallow statement.

Nicknames can sometimes sound stupid, but all but a few just don't grate on me like the totally-inaccurate mixups that can lead to, or be representative of, vast technical or conceptual errors. (I've only seen "'tog" on the Internet, thank gawd!!)

P.S. Oh yeah! And "ATM machine" and "PIN number!!!!"

And let's not forget the diner patron's classic, heard millions of times a day by servers: "A double cheeseburger with cheese."
 
OP
OP

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Are there still people afraid of fire when they see film?

It never happened to me, but somehow I dream of telling someone that nitrate film has not been commonly used since the end of WWII, so they can stuff their fire safety concerns somewhere dark.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,369
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
2F/2F said:
And let's not forget the diner patron's classic, heard millions of times a day by servers: "A double cheeseburger with cheese."
Click to expand...

"Chili con carne with meat, please."

To be repetitive, redundant, and repeating again!
 

greybeard

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
366
Location
Northern Cal
Format
Large Format
Shooting - What's wrong with photographing? Or taking pictures?

A minor peeve of mine: "shoot" seems to have come from the same place as "snapshot", which was originally a "snap shot" as opposed to one deliberately aimed and fired. Using a gun, not a camera. So, hearing some guy describe how he had his camera out for some shots with his girlfriend makes me wonder A) what exactly did he do to get her that ticked off; B) did she hit the camera, and if so, is it repairable or a total loss? If I'm completely off the mark and they went to a bar, why did he take his camera?

Even more minor: it is properly f/ stop, not F-stop. In somewhat the sense that organs have stops, but in this case with an open area having the indicated mathematical relationship to the focal length. (I wonder how a smart 'phone auto-correct function deals with that....)
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,082
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Well (deep hole in the ground), I guess I'll have to figure what aperture to set on the fast lense of my 120mm Rollie camera when I go out shooting next. I want my glass to make good bokeh but not blow out the highlights. I didn't have much luck with my Cannon last time...maybe my film was too fast.

I am using that infer-red film, so I better make sure my camera does not get too hot in the sun and have the heat fog the film -- or worst, cause the film to catch on fire!

I'll soup the film tomorrow. Hope it comes out okay as I am hoping for an invite to a local 'togs club and I don't want them to think I am a noob.
 

tomalophicon

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
1,568
Location
Canberra, AC
Format
Sub 35mm

Nice capture!
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
Vaughn said:
I guess I'll have to figure what aperture to set on the fast lense of my 120mm Rollie camera
Click to expand...

Don't set it open too much or you will loose the highlight detail.


Steve.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,082
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
The last time my highlights got loose they ate my neighbors cat.
 

Diapositivo

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
3,257
Location
Rome, Italy
Format
35mm
I know, I know, I often make mistakes of that kind and that's why I typically edit my text many times (I see them only while reading my text again). I should have been more careful on that particular text, though
 

Thomas Bertilsson

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format

I agree. It's a 'summary' that poorly describes just how the tones interrelate. I was just interested to see where you'd go with it. Thanks.
 

Thomas Bertilsson

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Vaughn said:
The last time my highlights got loose they ate my neighbors cat.
Click to expand...

Good one!

Yet sometimes, highlights are so bad that the best they can do IS to eat the neighbor's cat.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,082
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
But it is the shadows I am worried about -- anything could be hiding deep in the carbon blacks...
 

bblhed

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
600
Location
North Americ
Format
Multi Format

Now I'm really going to confuse you here. I design radiation detectors, the good laboratory grade ones, they are basically Digital cameras that see another part of the EM spectrum and you can actually image with some of the more complex array units. one major problem that we have with these units is that we have to IR shield them because they really can see IR heat, never mind that huge chunk of the EM spectrum between IR heat and radiation, it can't see that, but heat is a real problem for us.

Sorry fro saying Digital Camera, oh that reminds me, those have IR light filters on the sensors, but not IR heat shields.

I think this would be a lot less confusing if someone would just split IR into heat and light.
 

removed-user-1

lxdude said:
Totally unrealistic, IMO. An F3 w/MD-4 jamming like that? Hmmph.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Hilarious video, though! Love the scene of a guy tossing a new film cassette to the F3 shooter in slow motion.

"120mm" film is probably my biggest pet peeve among inaccurate photography jargon and I admit that's why I started reading this thread.
 

florsaluzzo

Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
3
Location
Dublin
Format
4x5 Format
Hi all.. I am new here and I have to say that this post made me laugh a lot! So many I agree with and as I was thinking of the next one that annoys me, there it was posted again!

I would say that I have to things photography related that irritates me big time:
1 - as soon as you say that you are a photographer, the 1st question I get is "what camera do you use?" It irritates me to the point of wanting to rip the head off the other one! My answer from now on is: "I have 9, which one you wanna know?"

2 - the other question I get when the other one is not much into photography but wants to pretend he/she is: "Film or digital?" or as the irish would say "The Philum or The Digihal?"

Seriously, people.......

Seriously
 

Thomas Bertilsson

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format

Seriously welcome to the melting pot of Philum photography!

Your observations are so true. The contradiction was made spelled out:

If you buy an expensive grand piano, you become the owner of a grand piano.
But if you buy an expensive digital camera, you somehow become an expert photographer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…