120 Verichrome Pan! Ideas Please!

Back on The Mound

A
Back on The Mound

  • 1
  • 0
  • 29
The Castle

A
The Castle

  • 0
  • 0
  • 48
Sonatas XII-91 (Farms)

A
Sonatas XII-91 (Farms)

  • 2
  • 2
  • 58
Sydney Harbour

A
Sydney Harbour

  • 5
  • 2
  • 123
Sonatas XII-90 (Farms)

A
Sonatas XII-90 (Farms)

  • 0
  • 2
  • 89

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,372
Messages
2,807,050
Members
100,235
Latest member
Photoguy1001
Recent bookmarks
0

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
3,048
Format
Multi Format
My Old Friend.

Verichrome Pan 120 by Nokton48, on Flickr


Three rolls 120 Verichrome Pan, purchased for $7.00 each.
Like I need more film, Heh-Heh.

2003 should be fine. Your thoughts and ideas Please.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,914
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
For the roll dated 2003 I would use HC110 or D76, shoot at ISO 50, D76 was considered the classic paring with VP, for the older rolls, maybe Diafine, shoot at box speed, hard to mess up with a divided developer, down side is that it look a little mushy as VP has really fine grain to begin with.
 

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,953
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
When I was just a kid I did my Verichrome in Dektol from the TriChem packs, then diluted that to make the prints. It looks great in Dektol so I would imagine it will look good in whatever you use.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
54,073
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
When I was just a kid I did my Verichrome in Dektol from the TriChem packs, then diluted that to make the prints. It looks great in Dektol so I would imagine it will look good in whatever you use.
You may be right, but my vague recollection is that the developer in those packs wasn't identified as Dektol, but rather as something like Kodak Universal developer.
But as for the OP's question, if it were up to me I would use HC-110 dil B and the recommended time for that combination from one of my Kodak Darkroom Dataguides.
 

nosmok

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
694
Format
Multi Format
Overexpose by 1 stop, and develop in Caffenol-C for approximately 10 minutes at 20 deg C will make you a very happy camper. For VeriPan this new, I might just shoot it at box speed, or reduce dev time to 8 minutes. One of the greatest B+W films ever made, still.
 

kreeger

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
207
Location
Missouri
Format
Multi Format
Here are the last docs from Kodak, this includes times for post Y2K developers such as TMAX-RS.

Tonally, VP120 and Tri-X 120 (not pro) had a lot in common, development times were within 60 seconds of each other when I shot it quite frequently in late 80s, I used D-76 1:1 for 11 mins at 68F (Tri-x was 10 mins).
I still have 3 frozen rolls from last brick I had. The last roll I developed showed a .04 density increase in base fog over when it was fresh.
 

Attachments

  • Kodak Verichrome Pan - publication F7.pdf
    55.1 KB · Views: 122
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
3,048
Format
Multi Format
Thanks Everybody! I have some new ideas, now. I'm going to shoot this little bit very carefully, probably rather slowly.
My Plaubel Makinas and Makiflexes are crying out for that unique Verichrome SMELL. Ahhhhhhhhhhh........
 
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
3,048
Format
Multi Format
Monday I am going to the local Zoo with my Wife and Makina III, loaded with Verichrome Pan! Will also take some FP4+ and Foma 200, for comparison.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,599
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I have two 620 rolls I am saving for some time with my grandchildren. I have no idea how to develop in replenished XTOL after shooting it in a Kodak Brownie Hawkeye camera.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,333
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
So I get it. But I think that just confirms, my wife's suspicion, that I'm crazy. Mine is frozen, I think I paid $1.79 a roll, or $7.00 adjusted for inflation :laugh:.
 

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,145
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
I just shot a roll that expired in 1987, with unknown storage. I alternated shots exposing at 50 or 25. I haven’t scanned yet, but the negative looks a little weak, with a lot of base fog. That was in Xtol, for I forget how long. (Whatever the discontinued section of the massive dev chart said for 125.)

But I posted to say that I love that at the beginning of the roll, on the backing paper, is exposure instructions.
 
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
3,048
Format
Multi Format
I'm going to shoot my three rolls at EI 50 and EI 25. That should do it. Developer? Ehh We will see.
 
OP
OP
Nokton48

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
3,048
Format
Multi Format
Dan, what is wrong with you favorite ADOX Borax MQ developer?

Hi Goran,

Yes I think I will use the ADOX Borax MQ. Need to mix up some fresh stock solution.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom