• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

110/16mm Camera Image Quality

I found a listing on ebay for a lot of 13 Kodak Flings. I wonder if it's worth scooping up just for the film.
 
Huss, do you send your film out for developing and scans?
 
wjlapier said:
Huss, do you send your film out for developing and scans?
Click to expand...

I send it out (actually walk down the street and drop it off) for developing, scan it myself with a digicam and Lomo Digitiza 110 film holder, using a copy stand.
Then convert it with negativelabpro.com
 
Rollei A110, Fukkatsu 400

"How to be an Artist. Chapter 1, paragraph 1, sentence 1 - shoot 110 film. The End"

 
In the middle up building a new PC. I'm going to get negative labs pro this time around. Huss's scans are some of the best I've seen.
 
Rollei A110, Fukkatsu 400

This cartridge demonstrates my frustration with the Fukkatsu film. It came out great for this set, but most of the other cartridges gave me lousy results, photographing in the same lighting conditions with the same gear.
So it really is hit and miss.

 
Yup, easy to take the film out of those disposable cameras. You can even reload the camera if you want.



 
Ian Grant said:
110 quality is superb but you can't get the films, 5"x4" roll film negative give outstanding results.

Ian
Click to expand...

You're 60+ years off on your dates. We're talking about the newer 110 film here...
 
Huss said:
Yup, easy to take the film out of those disposable cameras. You can even reload the camera if you want.
Click to expand...

Thanks pretty cool for a minimalist camera. I wonder how the film aged. I shot a roll of Gold 200 last year and nothing showed up on it.
 
Cholentpot said:
New PC is up and running. Going to migrate my Lightroom and download negativelabpro and see what I can pull out of my negatives.
Click to expand...

Before NLP I spent/wasted so much time building my own profiles and then having to tweak them non stop. And with all that the results still werent great.

NLP for me is an essential part of my kit and totally worth spending money on.
 
Huss said:
Before NLP I spent/wasted so much time building my own profiles and then having to tweak them non stop. And with all that the results still werent great.

NLP for me is an essential part of my kit and totally worth spending money on.
Click to expand...

My process I have now is excellent but it takes up an insane amount of space. Exporting a RAW to PS, inverting and sending back to LR as a TIFF is huge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register