...impressed when an article includes multiple spellings for the same name or word.
AFAIK, Eastman Kodak wrote a specific exception into KodakAlaris' contract rights when they re-negotiated their contract recently - the exception that supplies Cinestill with their modified for special purpose...
Alaris and Cinestill (I'm sure) have voiced concerns. There's been a bit of a "Wild West" market for this stuff. I think EK is protecting it's brands, and even the consumer from getting mishandled film. I suspect it is also helpful to processing labs to not have unexpected remjet crud.
The new...
KodakAlaris has the exclusive right to sell Eastman Kodak photo film. Alaris's lawyers probably told Eastman to stop selling film for re-spooling or Alaris will sue them. Don't blame Eastman. Their contracts legally bind them.
There was a period of time when KodakAlaris was contracting for different versions of HC-110, depending on the market that it was being traded into. The EU destined syrupy version was still being made in the EU, while the other version was being made in the USA.
As the extreme longevity of...
...and re-bottling it as Rodinal, with labelling the same colour and type style as Agfa.
More recently there was the Kodak debacle where KodakAlaris sold the chemistry rights to Sino Promise, when they pulled out the rights reverted to Eastman Kodak. At some point the trade names of some Kodak...
For clarity, both of your contacts above were not to Kodak - either Eastman Kodak or KodakAlaris.
One was to Photo Systems, and the other was to Photo Systems' Kodak branded chemicals division - where the contact people are their distributors, Cinestill.
KodakAlaris was the last Kodak direct...
Thanks, can I assume that with other developers you can use the film manufacturers' times which do not give thin negs and secondly what problems when printing those thin negatives do the thinner negs give you and finally, are you able to adjust print exposure and /or contrast to produce...
..not sure!
Is the XTOL you're using from the recent (PSI) production?
First time using XTOL at all.
I have used the times from the KodakAlaris data sheet for the first rolls (one T-Max, Tri-X, HP5 and Delta 400 each), second round I was actually using the longer times published by Ilford...
It matters a whole lot if you own KodakAlaris, and if you are Eastman Kodak and a party to the contract that exists between KodakAlaris and Eastman Kodak, which doesn't allow Eastman Kodak to sell Kodak branded still film, or any film intended to be used as still film, to anyone other than...
Because KodakAlaris paid a huge amount for and owns the rights to distribute and market Kodak branded still film, and Eastman Kodak is restricted to marketing and distribution of Kodak branded motion picture film.
They were the actual manufacture for KodakAlaris (post Tetenal bankruptcy) and then for Sino Promise - at least for the portion of the worldwide product labelled as "Made in USA".
And that changed formulation was always designed to give users the same results, when reasonably fresh, as the...
I can't help but feel that some of these formulas have some sort of "anti-oxidizing" additive??? I don't know. Seems like my Kodak and Fuji chemistry has a better record (of course this was with the KodakAlaris China stuff). 🤔 😟😊
Vision 3 was/is quite lovely and that'd be sad to see it being taken away.
I have 0 respect towards Kodak / Alaris and their questionable business practices.
Have you seen Kodak branded SSD's? 🤣
I heard that there is drama between KodakAlaris and Eastman Kodak. Motion Picture sales to anything outside of motion picture projects is forbidden now(as far as i understand), so this decision is a massive blown for anyone aiming to bulk load motion picture film. Tri-X, Vision 3.. all the good...
Thanks for contacting KodakAlaris
Yes, that is true. We are now coating our Professional Color Negative Films (Portra / EKTAR) on 0.10 mm (3.94 mil) KODAK ESTAR.
There are a number of benefits to ESTAR:
It is manufactured by Eastman KodakKodak ESTAR features very high clarity /...
...From EK's point of view, they are a much better repository of the brand than Sino Promise was, but EK had no say in the sale of what was KodakAlaris' to sell. EK is merely fortunate enough to be able to benefit from Sino Promise' demise, because KodakAlaris was unable or unwilling (or...
To quote myself “…Kodak (?* photo systems, alaris, Sino promise, etc.) never bothered to do the tests to update their data sheets that photographers rely on because at this point they are not photographers or concerned with photography at all. They're just chemistry manufacturers/distributors.”...
Where are you getting the idea that Eastman Kodak is changing the thickness of the acetate on Portra 400 and Ektar. This is nonsense.
If you are running a laboratory you should be running test strips even on black and white. I've not had a problem with any XTOL, not Tetenal made (beautiful...
...the brand name - since the bankruptcy.
EK doesn't even have a direct connection with the film datasheets - those are now entirely KodakAlaris.
EK has no more control over what Photo Systems are doing, as long as the terms of the brand licensing are complied with.
For example, if you look at...
...produced were always of the highest quality. Chinese batches from Sino promise were almost unusable. I have sent all these facts to KodakAlaris because they are our trading partners (I try a contact photosys in 2025).
Now I have developed a Tri-X in X-Tol (currently 04/2024 - Made in USA)...
Absolutely. I believe this is a valid point, whether or not the chemistry you purchase is considered "reliable/trustworthy" or more in the "unreliable/risky" category.
I’ve lost interest in “Kodak” chemistry. In 2019, I purchased multiple packages of D-76, Xtol, and Dektol from different...
...it is their (Kodak TM/C with a circle around it/R or whatever) problem. As a consumer (I'm not a lab, I'm not a photofinisher, I have no KodakAlaris account or whatever, I just buy their junk at Freestyle) I look at the big yellow Kodak logo and I buy their product and I use it as they...
As there is no Kodak maintained information about XTol any more, it is Photo Systems that you need to address your wish to.
The problem of course is that there are references to the old XTol numbers in the film datasheets, which are hosted by KodakAlaris.
...latest that I have seen. It is quoted from an email message that someone shared from the director of the "film capture product line" at KodakAlaris.
February 2024:
"135 format Gold 200, UltraMax 400, ColorPlus 200, ProImage 100, and Portra 800 coat on ESTAR."
"135 format EKTAR 100, Portra...
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.