...just over $2.00 CDN per second.
Eastman Kodak retained that relatively tiny (in terms of numbers) business, with mostly specialized and knowledgeable users, as their only involvement in distribution and marketing.
All the rest was bought and paid richly for by the original owners of KodakAlaris.
Fine. If they're so good and profitable, let Eastman issue them as photo films that are distributed by Alaris exclusively. No more cheap photo film made from cheaper stocks of movie film.
There was a major conversion capacity bottleneck. It couldn't be solved in a timely manner at the profit level at the time. Common sense would suggest that raising prices to the point that market demand adjusts to better match your available conversion capacity would have the effect of...
I wasn't trying to stop anything, Alan. Currently I don't buy either film or any colour film. I was merely suggesting what Wolfram's argument led me to think about what degree of harm comes to KA or its new buyers if respooling were to continue. Based on Wolfram's posts it just seemed to me that...
British-owned KodakAlaris was bought out last summer by very smart and aggressive American investors in Los Angeles near Hollywood. I'm sure they're monitoring sales and will adjust marketing accordingly. I think Eastman Kodak's improvement to manufacturing completed in November might have...
Stop trying to cut corners and buy Eastman Kodak photo film distributed by Alaris. Alaris has a legal right to protect their market. If you don't like how they run their business, buy another brand.
...pressure of KA and terminate these film sales: I am convinced it will be counterproductive for both companies in the mid and long term:
KodakAlaris' very agressive price policy, which is exploiting their de-facto monopoly for standard C-41 color negative film, has dramatic negative influence...
Matt, following Wolfram's argument, if KA does not consider it to be worth its while to sell one kind of film then doesn't charging EK to sell said film amount to an unfair market restriction on EK.
Is such a market restriction legal?
If KA has full control over the sale of the full range...
...COVID related disruptions.
Eastman Kodak was mostly able to continue operations throughout Covid, other than some furloughing of management and research staff, but the disruptions to the world wide shipping and distribution and retail channels apparently played havoc with KodakAlaris' business.
Have you seen the insane prices of Lomography CN800 lately? It's lovely stuff and if I really wanted to pay £30 for a roll of CN film it would be my first choice for high speed colour photography. Portra 800 just doesn't look good for my purposes (photographing gigs mostly in a small club). What...
It is the other way around.
Eastman Kodak will need to make the request.
KodakAlaris paid hundreds of millions of dollars for their rights, as well as effectively taking over millions and millions of dollars worth of Eastman Kodak's obligations, which together allowed Eastman Kodak to emerge...
That's what I'm saying. If Alaris is so concerned about Eastman selling a film that Alaris *doesn't want to handle* then Alaris needs to pipe down and let Eastman sell the film to whoever wants to buy it at whatever price Eastman sets for it, or put up the money to market the film themselves.
Other way around - KodakAlaris don't care about the tungsten balanced stuff, so that is where people need to get together and try to convince them to provide the same sort of exception to the contract language that Cinestill benefits from due to the remjet omitted nature of the entire master...
...movie studios. Just like if I was to call up and order a roll of Aerocolor IV, there is a minimum order, no matter who I am.
Now, if KodakAlaris is upset that they're missing out on such a tiny segment of sales that it can't be profitable for Eastman Kodak, then Alaris needs to handle sales...
This is an entirely valid complaint. It is also where there is likely room for a change in because KodakAlaris is unlikely to have any interest in tungsten balanced emulsions, because the market for tungsten balanced still film would be incredibly tiny.
Approach Cinestill about this - they...
...impressed when an article includes multiple spellings for the same name or word.
AFAIK, Eastman Kodak wrote a specific exception into KodakAlaris' contract rights when they re-negotiated their contract recently - the exception that supplies Cinestill with their modified for special purpose...
Alaris and Cinestill (I'm sure) have voiced concerns. There's been a bit of a "Wild West" market for this stuff. I think EK is protecting it's brands, and even the consumer from getting mishandled film. I suspect it is also helpful to processing labs to not have unexpected remjet crud.
The new...
KodakAlaris has the exclusive right to sell Eastman Kodak photo film. Alaris's lawyers probably told Eastman to stop selling film for re-spooling or Alaris will sue them. Don't blame Eastman. Their contracts legally bind them.
There was a period of time when KodakAlaris was contracting for different versions of HC-110, depending on the market that it was being traded into. The EU destined syrupy version was still being made in the EU, while the other version was being made in the USA.
As the extreme longevity of...
...and re-bottling it as Rodinal, with labelling the same colour and type style as Agfa.
More recently there was the Kodak debacle where KodakAlaris sold the chemistry rights to Sino Promise, when they pulled out the rights reverted to Eastman Kodak. At some point the trade names of some Kodak...
For clarity, both of your contacts above were not to Kodak - either Eastman Kodak or KodakAlaris.
One was to Photo Systems, and the other was to Photo Systems' Kodak branded chemicals division - where the contact people are their distributors, Cinestill.
KodakAlaris was the last Kodak direct...
Thanks, can I assume that with other developers you can use the film manufacturers' times which do not give thin negs and secondly what problems when printing those thin negatives do the thinner negs give you and finally, are you able to adjust print exposure and /or contrast to produce...
..not sure!
Is the XTOL you're using from the recent (PSI) production?
First time using XTOL at all.
I have used the times from the KodakAlaris data sheet for the first rolls (one T-Max, Tri-X, HP5 and Delta 400 each), second round I was actually using the longer times published by Ilford...
It matters a whole lot if you own KodakAlaris, and if you are Eastman Kodak and a party to the contract that exists between KodakAlaris and Eastman Kodak, which doesn't allow Eastman Kodak to sell Kodak branded still film, or any film intended to be used as still film, to anyone other than...
Because KodakAlaris paid a huge amount for and owns the rights to distribute and market Kodak branded still film, and Eastman Kodak is restricted to marketing and distribution of Kodak branded motion picture film.
They were the actual manufacture for KodakAlaris (post Tetenal bankruptcy) and then for Sino Promise - at least for the portion of the worldwide product labelled as "Made in USA".
And that changed formulation was always designed to give users the same results, when reasonably fresh, as the...
I can't help but feel that some of these formulas have some sort of "anti-oxidizing" additive??? I don't know. Seems like my Kodak and Fuji chemistry has a better record (of course this was with the KodakAlaris China stuff). 🤔 😟😊
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.