masculinity
Stephen Frizza

masculinity

This image was created by me when i was 17. Our art class in high school was given a project to create an artwork on masculinity and femininity in modern society.
Our art teacher was a bit of a feminist so i took a very chauvinist view on the whole project. I made out as though women essentially have fucked up the role of man. To do this I called many farmers until one agreed to let me cut the balls of one of his cows. well i got the balls so the project was set. I did a 6 piece triptych
2 panels one on the top left and one on top right being a womans hands clenching a set of severed testicles with a middle panel being a woman who looks like a dyke tearing up a copy of a book called "the image of man".

below it was a second series with the left and right panels being of a mans hands crushing a beer can and blood running down his arm. the label on the beer can was Victoria bitter being symbolic of female bitterness towards men and the central panel was of a feminine man trying to tear a copy of a book called "the Female eunuch"

My teacher didn't quite know what to make of the series. sadly the series is now lost all except this panel.

I should also comment I was suprised how much resistance there is when using a sharp knife to remove testicles i thought they would come off easy. they dont.
Location
my home
Equipment Used
canon Eos and a 80mm lens
Exposure
unknown
Film & Developer
delta 400 in ID-11
Paper & Developer
scan from film
Lens Filter
none
"This is my 2nd post here. And this is the most self aggrandizing example of total selfishness I've seen. Sorry I don't find it amusing, cute or artistic."

it wasn't selfish, the animal wasn't using them. And i wanted the real thing for the image. it wasn't meant to be cute or amusing, it was meant to set an emotion of unease. i should also state that i was 17 and that while i still think the body of work had impact, there are more mature ways I would approach the subject today.
 
i threw the balls out after the shoot. They weren't eaten, but the rest of the animal was when i grew up a bit more they sent it to abattoir i guess
 
"the animal wasnt that old when i cut its bits off and some months later it was going to be eaten."

I'm not going to keep on with this. But the fact that it was going to be eaten anyway does not really justify your inflicting more pain. Why don't you use your own in the same manner next time.

I'm out of here.
 
Sorry I didn't mean to offend, um de-sexing animals is common practice in our country.
we do it with dogs and cats and sheep and cows and well virtually all animals.
 
We all know it goes on in the farming world, but I think the in your face nature of it is what is distateful to some. The fact that most castrations of livestock can be inhumane is reinforced here... Let's face it, if someone put two thick rubber bands on my junk... or yours, and cut inbetween them without anaesthesia..... Well let's just say it would smart a bit!! Would I mind losing them? Absolutely!!! Is it art.... not for me to judge, the fact you inflicted this is disturbing, and stated that the animal wouldn't mind losing them. While I am not squeemish, and do hunt animals to eat, it's all about ethics. None were applied here. Do it the right way. Cutting the nuts off a creature is still torture if its conscious and restrained and without anaesthesia. To call around knowingly wanting to do this is a bit out there. It's not a criticism, but I sense that the shock and awe approach is a theme I have seen in some other examples of your work. Again, this is not a criticism. Controversy is interesting and not least thought provoking.
 
"it wasn't selfish, the animal wasn't using them."

Dude, you have no clue!
 
I have followed you work, and aside of few rare moment your main motivation is to shock people. Interestingly enough,your work leaves me cold and uninterested, differently from your actions which offend me. If, in order to take a mere picture at any cost, you cut the testicles of a bull, it means that you are out of touch and it speaks about cruelty, but only yours.
 
Ah, city slickers!

I sort of expected the controversy to be about the original stated theme of emasculation of men ("women have...fucked up the role of men"), not on the props used or how they were acquired -- which is a commonplace and necessary function in animal husbandry.

It seems the assignment was to present a provocative political statement on "masculinity and feminity in modern society" and Stephen sounds like he pulled it off (er, that was a bad choice of words!).

I won't be asking for a signed print, but from my perspective it is a view on how a photography student interprets an assignment and then sets out to realize the imagery necessary to illuminate a concept, and, I must say, with some fortitude. I guess he shouldn't have shared so much backstory.

The reaction we've had is supposed to make us consider if and how this has been done, metaphorically, to men, in much more subtle and/or subversive ways. That is what the artist intended the viewer to debate -- I think.
 
The complete and utter disrespect for the animal that had to part with his 'bits' disgusts me. I realize that may well be the intent, but that still doesn't make it right.
The photograph disgusts me, but not as much as the actions, 17yo or not. All this for a photograph. Ban me from APUG if you want, but who the hell do you think you are?
 

Media information

Album
Member Album by Stephen Frizza
Added by
Stephen Frizza
Date added
View count
3,154
Comment count
33
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Filename
balls.jpg
File size
71 KB
Date taken
Mon, 04 May 2009 11:28 PM
Dimensions
453px x 567px

Share this media

Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom