Floral_arrangement_II_copy

• Jorge

• Aug 8, 2005

Have camera, will travel...

 

• 

  Charles Webb

• Aug 8, 2005

I must agree with some of what the others have said, but Thomas it' a fine image and stands as it is.

Glad you posted it! It is one to study!

 

• roy

• Aug 8, 2005

Taken as an individual shot, there may well be criticisms. I think that as part of a series, it works well in the company of the rest of the work.

 

• Thomassauerwein

• Aug 8, 2005

Philldresser are you saying They're not happy? (maybe I need a bigger lense)
Thanks also Charles and Roy. Boy if I do get a bigger camera that means all the stuff already shot would need to be re-shot. What a night mare that would be!

 

• 

  gma

• Aug 10, 2005

For me the wide mirror at the left does no harm, but I think a bit narrower would be good too. Thanks for sharing another interesting photograph. It must take hours to set up your scenes.

 

• Leon

• Aug 11, 2005

thomas - great to see you posting pics up again. this is yet another great shot (pretty much one of the best I've seen of yours concept-wise) nicely done.

 

• ian_greant

• Aug 13, 2005

hmm, even before reading the comments one of my first thoughts was "Thomas needs to move to LF" It's more than the large neg. I think having camera movements may give you the perspective control you need to fine tune your vision. Personally I find my 4x5 pretty fast to handle, and have even used it for wedding portraits. I'm sure you'd do fine. btw - Love the Platinum Prints!

 

• Early Riser

• Nov 20, 2006

One of your images came up in the random section at the time that a discussion on nudes was taking place. I was critical of someone's nudes because I felt they were lacking creativity, thought and effort. Your work is exactly the opposite of that. A very well thought out body of work and an excellent example of what can be done to shot nudes in a creative way.

Bravo