Censorship
IMG_7702.jpeg
IMG_6970.jpeg
IMG_7602.jpeg
Censorship
In flight
On The Mound
last sunset of vacation
awty

Censorship

  • A
  • awty
Hi fellow gallery regulars, if you didnt already realize the gallery is about to be taken over by Tallahassee P&C association and with out any consultation with people who actually regularly contribute to the gallery. They will make people who post nudes censor their work or the mods will do it.
Click to expand...
Equipment Used
Camera and lens
Exposure
2 secs
Film & Developer
wet plate
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: sperera and mfohl
awty
Don_ih said:
This would actually be more like a notice to people saying that the room ahead contained nude photos. And then let anyone in who wanted to go in.

You have some problem with being informed?
Click to expand...
I use to feel comfortable in my own skin, now I feel grotesque and dirty. Have to shower with my clothes on. I don't fit here, time to move on.
 
Don_ih
awty said:
I don't fit here
Click to expand...

No, you're just having a conniption. It'll pass. 🙂

Anyway, if the "Do you consider this image NSWF?" checkbox was already there, you wouldn't have given it a second thought - and never actually checked it - and never opted to not view photos that were. This isn't censorship. It's more like being asked if you have a middle name.
 
Sean
There is nothing being censored, there is not even code available to do such a thing in our gallery system. There has been discussion of allowing an individual the option to "enable" the blurring of nudes in case they are at work or around children (or offended I guess), but this would NOT be a default setting it would only be 'opt-in' per the individuals own site preferences. I certainly would hate to see you leave over a misunderstanding of sorts.

*edit: Also, I am assuming there are browser plugins for this anyway thanks to new AIs, where individuals who take issue with nudes can have their own plugin which blurs it. This is likely to be pushed back onto individuals to deal with on their own and outside of our infrastructure.
 
Daniela
Don_ih said:
No, you're just having a conniption. It'll pass. 🙂

Anyway, if the "Do you consider this image NSWF?" checkbox was already there, you wouldn't have given it a second thought - and never actually checked it - and never opted to not view photos that were. This isn't censorship. It's more like being asked if you have a middle name.
Click to expand...
I just learned the word conniption! 💪
 
Since it appears the site owner Sean has nixed this thing hopefully you’ll reconsider your departure.
awty said:
The Tallahassee Classical School fired a teacher for showing pictures of the statue of David to her class.
Click to expand...
 
awty
Sean said:
There is nothing being censored, there is not even code available to do such a thing in our gallery system. There has been discussion of allowing an individual the option to "enable" the blurring of nudes in case they are at work or around children (or offended I guess), but this would NOT be a default setting it would only be 'opt-in' per the individuals own site preferences. I certainly would hate to see you leave over a misunderstanding of sorts.

*edit: Also, I am assuming there are browser plugins for this anyway thanks to new AIs, where individuals who take issue with nudes can have their own plugin which blurs it. This is likely to be pushed back onto individuals to deal with on their own and outside of our infrastructure.
Click to expand...
I don't think members should have to put their pictures in a nude category, it still implies their is something wrong with their pictures and I can see members taking offence to this. I haven’t see any nudes here even remotely offensive. In fact most get double the views others get. Just leave the gallery as is, if someone doesn't want to see something they can just move to the next picture. It's more important to keep photographers involved in the gallery.
 
Sean
awty said:
I don't think members should have to put their pictures in a nude category, it still implies their is something wrong with their pictures and I can see members taking offence to this. I haven’t see any nudes here even remotely offensive. In fact most get double the views others get. Just leave the gallery as is, if someone doesn't want to see something they can just move to the next picture. It's more important to keep photographers involved in the gallery.
Click to expand...

There is no change to the main galleries. Some members might start their own forum threads where they post links to nudes or choose to use the 'spoiler' bbcode which requires a click to open. That is their choice if they want such a thread, but the main gallery remains as is. I have seen a few browser plugins that do detect and blur nudes, I suggest if folks have issues then they install their own blocking tools.
 

Media information

Category
Standard Gallery
Added by
awty
Date added
View count
1,412
Comment count
21
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Device
SAMSUNG NX3000
Aperture
ƒ/11
Focal length
60.0 mm
Exposure time
1/15 second(s)
ISO
3200
Filename
22.05.24.JPG b.JPG
File size
1.1 MB
Date taken
Sat, 07 June 2014 2:10 PM
Dimensions
3046px x 3807px

Share this media

Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:
Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom