Zuiko 50 f1.4 or Zuiko 50 f1.4?

mopar_guy

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Messages
1,176
Location
Washington,
Format
Multi Format

Yes, that's the theory. In my experience, the differences do exist, but are slight. Also, a lens such as the 50mm f2 Zuiko Macro should be complete crap with it's nine elements, but it is a very good lens.:munch:
 

wblynch

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,697
Location
Mission Viejo
Format
127 Format
LaChou said:
Would you care to buy an aperture-free one? ))))
I have a friend who likes disassembling lenses in his free time. The ones he manages to assemble can be sold relly cheap. )).
Click to expand...

Actually I do need one like that. I have a 1.4 that came to me with a small chip on the edge of the front element. A broken lens like that would be a perfect donor .

Provided it was priced appropriately, of course.
 

sangetsu

Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2009
Messages
214
Location
東京
Format
4x5 Format
I have used a few variations of each type of lens, I have two of them on my desk now. My favorites are the 50/1.8, and the 50/1.2. The 50/1.8 is my favorite "all-around" lens, I use the 55/1.2 for shooting wide open at near subjects. The 55/1.2 gives dreamy results when shooting flowers, plants, or insects.
 
OP
OP

peters8

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
105
Format
35mm
Thank you very much...
I don't speak and I don't understand at 100% english leanguage so please be patient with me
although I know it is not easy with my "stupid" questions...
I explaine a little:i haven't a lot of money...i can't buy both lens,unfortunarely.I must buy only zuiko 50 mm.
I need a excelent 50 mm,it isn't important at all the l the brightness of the glass. I don't use 1.4 or 1.8 diaphragms never so the brightness isn't an important feature at all.
I'm searching for a Zuiko 50 lens with sharpness,acutance,ecc...ecc...not with hight brightness level!
It seems that the 1.8 is better at this respect.
Is it correct?...
The 50 1.4 Zuiko that I could buy is the "OM-SYSTEM G.ZUIKO AUTO-S 1.4",while in this moment i don't remember at all which was the correct 1.8 model that I could buy...
So tecnically any 50 1.8 Zuiko lens,if I understanding correctly,is better (a part the brightness that it's not an important feature for me) than the G.Zuiko AUTO-S 1.4 50mm lens.
Is it correct?...in this case I prefer to buy the 1.8 50 mm Zuiko.
So do you think that this is the right choice for me?
I repeat, I'm sorry if I'm burdening us,but I haven't money at the moment and I've to do the right choice.In this case I haven't the possibility to experiment,to make comparisons...I must buy the right 50 mm Zuiko lens.
Please,for the last time,give me an opinion,Itrust you.
thanks for you patience.
Regards
 

wblynch

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,697
Location
Mission Viejo
Format
127 Format
Buy the one with the cleanest glass. That makes more difference than anything else.

I have 8 of the 1.8 and 3 of the 1.4

Cleanliness is Godliness.
 
OP
OP

peters8

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
105
Format
35mm
Bill,sorry but this answer doesn't help much me!...I buy any lens only if it's in good conditions.
I need the best 50 mm,I repeat (i'm sorry...I'm tired too!!!...I'm sorry...I'msorry my friends!) I don't need brightness...I need sharpness,contrast...acutance anything else!!!..This is not a subjective detail, it is an objective detail... It is mathematics:the technical features of any lens are objective,they does not depend on personal taste ...they are equal for all, are universal. It's a picture you get with that lens that is subjectively good or bad ... not the lens in itself...The sharpness,the contrast,the distortion of lens are technical datas that are measured in laboratory scientifically ... not through personal tastes.At least it's my opinion...I hope that you can understand me.I know that write and speak english very bad.i'm very sorry for this.



It would be sufficient only a rapid answer...anything else!...Zuiko 1.4 or Zuiko 1.8...this is the dilemma!
Please don't hate me friends!
Regards!
 

wblynch

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,697
Location
Mission Viejo
Format
127 Format
There is no BEST.

My answers are based on owing and using these for 38 years.

Sorry I have.no more to offer.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,209
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

I know that we are frustrating you, but there really isn't a clear answer to your question.

If you exclude the small difference in maximum aperture, and are comparing performance stopped down a stop or two, the Zuiko 50mm 1.4 and 1.8 lenses perform very similarly - any difference in performance is more likely due to sample variation then it is due to design differences.

If you do measure those things that can be measured on an optical bench, you will probably find that one will be slightly better at one f/stop, while the other will be slightly better art another.

The later versions have better coatings.

The f/1.4 version gives you a brighter viewfinder. The f/1.8 version is very compact.
 
OP
OP

peters8

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
105
Format
35mm
Ok i'm grateful for your patience and for the big support you have given to me!thanks you to everyone! i've decided.i'll buy the 1.4
only the last question:is the G.Zuiko the single coated version?
regards
 

mopar_guy

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Messages
1,176
Location
Washington,
Format
Multi Format
peters8 said:
Ok i'm grateful for your patience and for the big support you have given to me!thanks you to everyone! i've decided.i'll buy the 1.4
only the last question:is the G.Zuiko the single coated version?
regards
Click to expand...

Yes.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
mopar_guy said:
Yes, that's the theory. In my experience, the differences do exist, but are slight. Also, a lens such as the 50mm f2 Zuiko Macro should be complete crap with it's nine elements, but it is a very good lens.:munch:
Click to expand...

My Nikkor UD 20/3.5 should be even crappier, with it's 11 single coated elements (I forget the number of air-to-glass surfaces) but it's also an excellent lens. It's the number of internal sufaces, not the number of elements, anyway.
 

Ken N

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
386
Location
Creston and
Format
Multi Format
With both the 1.8 and 1.4 lenses, the earlier versions tended to be sharper in the center. Later versions not quite as sharp in the center, but the corners are sharper. Later versions of both lenses also are contrastier, less flare prone and SLIGHTLY more flat-fielded.

If stopped down in the F5.6 to F8 realm, the 1.8 and 1.4 render nearly identical images. My controlled testing reveals no advantage one to the other.

I personally reach for the 1.4 because of how the bokeh renders. It's just a little more artsy. Mine are all of the last version made.
 

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,763
Format
35mm
I don't think the 50/2 replaced the 50/3.5. The f/2 lens was much more espensive. I have the f/3.5 and it is sharp at every distance and f/stop. If a normal lens will be used closed down and you are yearning for sharpness, get a medium format camera. If I use a Bronica GS-1 with the normal 100/3.5 lens I will expect to get a sharper 8X10, 11X14, 16X20 etc. than any standard lens with a 35mm camera can produce.
 

John Hermanson

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
306
Location
Huntington,
Format
35mm
There are 5 different 50mm 1.8. Te best one was the last one made: it says "made in Japan" on the name ring. It is multicoated and very sharp. There were 5 different 50mm 1.4 made. The last version is preferred by most. It is multicoated and (I think) has serial numbers above 1,110,000. John
 
OP
OP

peters8

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
105
Format
35mm

John how do I recognize the 1.4 multicoated version?...
Is there a particular identification?...In my Zuiko if I remember well (now it is not with me) there's this identification:
"G.zuiko om-system Auto-s"...could this identification be right?...I'm sure that it was a G.Zuiko...Do you know something about this version/this serie?
Thanks
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format

It will be marked "MC". At least mine is, as well as several other multicoated Zuikos I have.
 

Ulrich Drolshagen

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
532
Location
Germany
Format
Medium Format
E. von Hoegh said:
It will be marked "MC". At least mine is, as well as several other multicoated Zuikos I have.
Click to expand...

AFAIK only during the phase of transition from singlecoated to multicoated when there were sold both types at the same time, the multicoated lenses were denoted by MC. Later, when all new lenses were multicoated Olympus dropped the term.
 

mopar_guy

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Messages
1,176
Location
Washington,
Format
Multi Format

In general terms, single coated lenses are labeled with a letter of the alphabet and the name Zuiko. The letter used indicates how many elements are used: A=1, B=2, C=3, etc. Your G.Zuiko is a single coated lens. Some early production lenses were labeled with the letters MC to indicate multi-coating. Late production lenses are not specifically labeled as MC, but multi-coating was used on all lenses starting around the early 1980's. There were definitely differences in the way that lenses were labeled over the production run.

A couple of examples:

50mm f1.4 Zuiko AUTO-S
Introduced as part of the original "M" system. Early examples are labeled as G.Zuiko and have silver colored accents around the filter mounting threads as well as the aperture ring: OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM G.ZUIKO AUTO-S 1:1.4 f=50mm 470854. There was also a version of the G.Zuiko without the silver markings. When Olympus started to multi-coat all lenses, the 'G' was dropped and the lenses were labeled "MC". The last version was simply labeled as follows: OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO AUTO-S 50mm 1:1.4 1123989 Japan. I used my serial number as an example and this is definitely a multi-coated lens.

35mm f2.0 Zuiko AUTO-W
I have one with a low serial number that is a "Silver-nose". The complete labeling on the filter ring is: OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-W 1:2 f=35mm 106322 Japan.
I have a version that was made a little later and does not have the silver accents that is labeled: OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-W 1:2 f=35mm 129334 Japan.
The final version from after 1981 is labeled as follows: OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO AUTO-W 35mm 1:2 1508xx made in Japan.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Ulrich Drolshagen said:
AFAIK only during the phase of transition from singlecoated to multicoated when there were sold both types at the same time, the multicoated lenses were denoted by MC. Later, when all new lenses were multicoated Olympus dropped the term.
Click to expand...

That makes sense, the lenses I have were all purchased in the years 1985-1988.
 
OP
OP

peters8

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
105
Format
35mm
Thanks!

Does it change too much that they're simply just single-coated lenses or however this feature is not so negative after all?
Thanks
Ciao
 

Ulrich Drolshagen

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
532
Location
Germany
Format
Medium Format
peters8 said:
Thanks!

Does it change too much that they're simply just single-coated lenses or however this feature is not so negative after all?
Thanks
Ciao
Click to expand...

The use of a lens shade is more important to the reduction of flare than the number of coatings IMHO.

Ulrich
 

mopar_guy

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Messages
1,176
Location
Washington,
Format
Multi Format

John Hermanson

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
306
Location
Huntington,
Format
35mm
The 2 versions of the 50 1.4 that are MC have elements with green/purple reflections. Type 5 has these reflections but does NOT have MC on the name ring. Type 4 (below serial number 1,110,000) has same reflections and DOES have MC on the name ring. Type 3-2-1 are single coated and have G Zuiko (meaning 7 elements, G being the 7th letter of the alphabet) on the name ring. SC coating may have a yellowish look. Last multicoated version with a shade will outperform any SC with a lens shade. John
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…