ZORKI 5

Krzys

Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
505
Location
Brisbane, QL
Format
35mm
Can I get anyone's opinions on this camera? Also how thick in approximation is the width of the body?
 

Rol_Lei Nut

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
1,108
Location
Hamburg
Format
Multi Format
Nice, if you can live without slow speeds (nothing between 1/30 and B).

Lever advance and wide rangefinder base make it better than earlier Zorkis, if only they had added the blasted low speeds!

Usual Soviet camera caveats apply.

I no longer have one, but if IIRC, it was the same base size as other Zorkis. My Zorki 3 measures 141x32 mm at the base.
 

Martin Reed

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Messages
325
Location
North London
Format
Multi Format
I had, in fact still have, a Zorki 6 which is very similar but loads from the back. I thought the world of it when I was a teenager in the '60's, and imagined I was using a Leica (I had a vivid imagination then). But being realistic, the lack of low speeds is a major hindrance. Mine also had a strange habit of ripping the film sprockets up, the tension in the drive must have been out of kilter. Also the viewfinder leaves a lot to be desired, and the Industar 50 is only marginally better than the lens in a Diana.
 

julio1fer

Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2008
Messages
21
Location
Montevideo,
Format
35mm
My Zorki-6 is 32 mm thick at the base, the -5 should be the same. I like this camera a lot. As for the lenses,

the Industar 50 is only marginally better than the lens in a Diana

Well, maybe YMMV. I've never shot with a Diana, but my collapsible I-50 is a pretty good lens - sharp and contrasty.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

srs5694

Member
Joined
May 18, 2005
Messages
2,718
Location
Woonsocket,
Format
35mm
I've never shot with a Diana, but my collapsible I-50 is a pretty good lens - sharp and contrasty.

I've got a couple of non-collapsible I-50s on Zenit M39 SLRs, and they're OK. Here's the result of some informal lens tests I performed some time ago. Based on that, the I-50 isn't as good as more modern 50mm lenses from Pentax, Chinon, or KMZ (the Zenit maker), but it's a bit sharper and/or higher in contrast than a Tamron 28-70mm zoom. I've got a cropped 11x14 print of a photo I took with an I-50 lens on Kodachrome 64 hung on my wall. (I didn't happen to have a long enough lens for the subject when I took the photo, and I wanted to change from horizontal to vertical framing, so I cropped appropriately.) IMHO, it holds up surprisingly well to the extreme enlargement.
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
Both my Zorki Vs lenses are comparable with contemporary elmars? but they do need the elmar hood or (Fison) clone.
The lever wind (on both) is like turret of T-34 tank - budget for service.
Noel
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…