• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Zenit: someone use them?

I really liked my Zenit E, but the shutter would occasionally cap and invariably ruin the best shot on the roll. Very frustrating. To be fair, I had other makes of cameras that did that too, but was able to fix those. Mine also had a line that ran right down the middle of the viewfinder, which I am pretty sure was prism separation. After several failed attempts to fix the shutter capping I retired it and put the Helios lens on a Canon FT QL body w/ a simple adapter. Wow, what a great lens! I prefer the earlier designs that have the little stop down pin on the back, as they have that wonderful swirley bokeh. Mine made great portraits wide open, and was sharp as heck stopped down a little. Between it and my Nikkor PC 50 2 I had the 50 lenses covered. It was difficult to say which I preferred, as they had different qualities.

In short, the Zenit confirmed what I had found w/ the LTM FSU cameras back when I shot rangefinders. Keep the lenses, use the camera as a rear element body cap.
 
Last edited:

You might consider installing a microswitch (at the battery compartment?), or designing a cap to put over the camera top or grip.
 
Hi,

i have found a perfect Zenit 12XP like new.

The only problem that I have is the lightmeter.

The reading are perfect, i have compared with an external light meter.

if you approach your eye to the viewfinder perfectly reading it is perfect, but as soon as there is an infiltration of light in the viewfinder, the reading is wrong.

In particular, if you use glasses the meter reading is not reliable (because the lighter pass in the viewfinder)

You know how to fix or if you have an eyepiece to use to cancel the effect?
 

Search ebay for an m42 adapter for an eos body and attach the good lens to a good eos body. Problem solved!
 
I have a Zenit E that I have not shot a roll through yet but found it uncomfortable and clunky in a test run.
The Helios 44 is a fantastic lens but the very swirly bokah took some getting used to. There are definitely times that it doesn't work with the subject.
 
Simply shading the Zenit 12's eyepiece with my hand seemed to work better than eyecup + glasses.
 
I like the fact that people still use Zenits, but they're not for me. Compared to a Nikkormat, Spotmatic, Canon FTb, Minolta ST, for little extra cash, Zenits are agricultural in the extreme.

I have a bunch of Zenit m39 lenses but can't build any enthusiasm to get a body to fit them.
 
Have a Zenit E which I seldom/never use but the Russian lenses are adapted to be used on many of my SLRs and produce great results. Plan on getting a Fed 5C to mount some RF lenses I have come across. Jupiter 9 and a Industar 61.
 
Last edited:
Be wary of the latch on the door of the camera, Zenit E, if you are shooting the camera in the ER case. The camera will move up and down in the case and as the latch rubs on the ER case on the LHS, (looking from back of camera), it will come undone allowing the door to open a fraction.

When I first used this camera in the mid 70's I had numerous films where some of the frames had vertical overexposed streaks where light had leaked in when winding on the film. I got used to checking the camera frequently and closing and re-latching the film door. A friend helped me make a "C" shaped clamp from a strip of brass which I wedged over the left hand end of the camera to keep the door latch securely closed.

Lots of memorable pics with that Zenit E from 1973 to 1978 when I jumped into Canon FD gear. The Zenit still sits neglected in an old camera bag and it barely fires now as the shutter curtain struggles to get across the film gate. Should put it out of its misery.
 
Speaking of the ever-ready case: I have not came across any SLR-case that has as sturdy leather quality as the Zenit one. Inside it is even covered with another, soft leather quality.
 
AgX said:
Speaking of the ever-ready case: I have not came across any SLR-case that has as sturdy leather quality as the Zenit one. Inside it is even covered with another, soft leather quality.
Click to expand...

The leather they used looks like something that would fit a pair of riding boots....even if I prefer the grainy leather used on Spotmatics' cases at the touch.
 
trythis said:
Search ebay for an m42 adapter for an eos body and attach the good lens to a good eos body. Problem solved!
Click to expand...
That's very smart!
But that defeats the objective of this thread: to use a Zenit body.

Send your m39 lenses to me!
I'll find a nice Zenit 2C or a 3M for it.
 
My Zenit 11 (1985) was bought on ebay UK a few years ago. I check with the seller and he said he had it from new so that meant that it had been imported into the Uk through T&OE (Technical & Optical Equipment) in London. They had very good quality control checks and repairs on all their Russian cameras. As a result any Zenit from them would last. Infact one of their ex service engineers, Roger Lean services a Fed & Zorki 4 for me a few years ago and we chatted about Zenits.

Here is an article about the company http://cameras.alfredklomp.com/toe/

Here is an April 01 joke I did a few years ago. ( the Zenit 11 D) https://www.flickr.com/photos/50664634@N08/5845006428/in/dateposted-public/
 
foc said:
Here is an April 01 joke I did a few years ago. ( the Zenit 11 D) https://www.flickr.com/photos/50664634@N08/5845006428/in/dateposted-public/
Click to expand...

The joke's on you--they really were exploring digital cameras at one point!
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.zenitcamera.com/qa/qa-digital.html
http://www.zenitcamera.com/qa/qa-digital.html (original page in Russian)

Wouldn't those Zenit Z1 and D-L3 mockups make a great collector's items.
 

The 12XP I bought in mint conditions had their warranty card. And yes from a quality point of view it looks flawless.
 
But an EOS with the m42 adapter don't lose the infinity focus?
 
Part of me really wants to get one of the modern MC Zenitar lenses from lomography and put it on my XP12/XP12s photosniper body. I don't use my Zenit bodies very often however I do make a point of keeping one around so if I am out shooting with a friend and the batteries in his Nikon powerzoom run out I can hand him a Zenit loaded with FP4+.
Just in case anyone is unfamiliar with the lens I'm talking about you can find it here;
http://shop.lomography.com/en/lenses/other-lenses/mc-zenitar-m-2-8-16-fisheye-lens-1
 
  • AgX
  • Deleted
I have few Zenits body but I was disappointed when my film was broken after rewind. So I don't have much love for these cameras.
 
When I was in the local camera club we had a talk from the local Police photographer. He kept a small stock of Zenith Photosnipers for use by detectives on observation jobs. First because most detectives were a bit rough on kit and didn't seem to understand simple rules like, "Photo gear is NOT intended to be slung in odd corners when not in use!" And because if an obo team were disturbed by villains they could use the Zenith as a weapon. And, most times, it would still function as a camera afterwards. Equally important, Zeniths weren't too much of a drain upon his limited budget.
 
onre said:
Why would it? M42 flange distance is 45,46 millimeters, EOS 44 millimeters. Just enough space for an adapter.
Click to expand...

darkosaric said:
EOS is there really great, you can also use nikkors on EOS with an adapter.
Click to expand...
Yeahhhhhhh! Greaaaaaaaaat!
Now, would you please show me a fully MECHANICAL EOS? Pretty please?
Thanks a lot!
 
Ricardo Miranda said:
Yeahhhhhhh! Greaaaaaaaaat!
Now, would you please show me a fully MECHANICAL EOS? Pretty please?
Thanks a lot!
Click to expand...

Original post was about losing infinity focus with an adapter. No idea what that has to do with cameras being fully mechanical or not.

I'd say that number 1 problem with Zenits is the factory lubrication. After cleaning and re-lubricating they tend to work just fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register