Zeiss Lenses for Pentax K-mount cameras

Rob Skeoch

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
1,345
Location
Grand Valley, Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Zeiss has released the pricing on their new line of lenses for the Pentax K-mount system.
They are offering six lenses in the K-mount, the same as they have in the Nikon F mount. They're at the same price as the F lenses as well. The F-mount lenses are all now available while the K-mount system will be shipping in the fall.

These are the selling prices of the six SLR lenses..

25mm 2.8 Distagon $787
35mm 2 Distagon $787
50mm 1.4 Planar $492
50mm 2 Makro-Planar $984
85mm 1.4 Planar $984
100mm F2 Makro-Planar $1507
 

Soeren

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
2,675
Location
Naestved, DK
Format
Multi Format
Roger Hicks said:
Excellent. I've used both in F-mount.
Click to expand...

Regardig the 25mm I agree. Tried it on the F100. Unfortunately its very expensive.
kind Regards
Søren
 
OP
OP

Rob Skeoch

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
1,345
Location
Grand Valley, Ontario
Format
35mm RF
I've heard the quality is great. I've only seen the 100 Makro and the construction is excellent. I think most people consider these up-grades from the regular prime Nikon and Pentax lenses.

Yes, I'm in Canada so the prices are Canadian dollars.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
Pentax K mount seems like a slightly odd choice, but that may just be a North American bias where the only real Pentax sales in the last 20 years have been K1000's and clones to first-time photography students. I wonder if Pentax has other more sophisticated K-mount cameras they sell in Japan only?
 

Steve Roberts

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
1,298
Location
Near Tavisto
Format
35mm


No/not many LX's in the US, then?

Steve
 

Andrew Moxom

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
4,888
Location
Keeping the
Format
Multi Format
This is quite good news for pentaxians. I know this is a silver based forum, but I was wondering how these lenses would fare on the newer digital pentax bodies? Seems like some K and KA mount pentax 35mm lenses work okay on digital bodies, but some produce CA.
 

Roger Hicks

Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
4,895
Location
Northern Aqu
Format
35mm RF

Probably a low marginal cost in offering K-mount as well as M42. And don't Pentax digi SLRs accept K-mount? I couldn't believe how good the 25/2.8 made the Nikon D70 look.
 

Chazzy

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
2,942
Location
South Bend,
Format
Multi Format
I don't suppose that Zeiss will ever get around to Minolta MD mount, but at least it's something to dream of.
 

matt miller

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
824
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Roger Hicks said:
And don't Pentax digi SLRs accept K-mount? I couldn't believe how good the 25/2.8 made the Nikon D70 look.
Click to expand...


The Pentax DSLR's do take K mount lenses, which is why these new Zeiss lenses are so appealing to me.
 

Oren Grad

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
1,619
Format
Large Format
TheFlyingCamera said:
Pentax K mount seems like a slightly odd choice
Click to expand...

Pentax K and Nikon F are the only two lens mounts that (a) have been in use for more than 30 years and (b) are still current on DSLRs. PK is also really easy to implement from an engineering point of view.

The KX/MX/LX crowd together with those Pentax DSLR users who want more high quality prime options ought to be plenty enough to make this line successful. The 25 in particular fills a critical gap in the semi-wide range for APS-C.
 

Bill Mitchell

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2003
Messages
524
Steve Roberts said:
No/not many LX's in the US, then?

Steve
Click to expand...

I've had three LXs. One of them (brand new) disappeared in a home burglary, one is nearly worn out, and one is still virtually new. The problem was always getting decent repar service from Pentax.
I've always felt that my SMCP lenses were superb, in fact even better optically than my M-Leica lenses, except for a DR Summicron which I stupidly gave to a friend.
I can't imagine that the Zeiss lenses are any better, although they may have more rugged mechanical parts (I presume that they are non-autofocus).
 

waynecrider

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
2,560
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
matt miller said:
The Pentax DSLR's do take K mount lenses, which is why these new Zeiss lenses are so appealing to me.
Click to expand...

With the new K10D getting some pretty good reviews, as reviews go that is, the Zeiss lens availability for Pentax brings the brand to attention. Pentax is now owned by Hoya.

Optics for the Pentax are bid quite heavily depending on the FL/lens and even a used 24mm in E+ condition at KEH is $300. Not near the Zeiss prices tho, but substantially more then finding a good used Nikon 24mm. When I have the money I'll buy the 25mm and put it on a Pentax.
 

Mark Layne

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
967
Location
Nova Scotia
Format
Medium Format
Roger Hicks said:
Really? I didn't know that. Have you any more information? I'm intrigued.
Click to expand...

This goes back to my life in Zeiss Historica. I believe it may be in Charlie Barringer's book( as is my 85mm Contarex Sonnar) -I'll have a look.
Mark
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
The M-42 lens mount was originally from Praktica. Asahi had been copying Praktica lens mounts from the get-go--first the smaller diameter, then the M-42.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…